Change log

University of Cape Town

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Claims6Sources5

University page Public JSON

University of Cape Town currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

11 # University of Cape Town AI policy record
2+teaching: UCT has published an AI in Education Framework for teaching, learning, and assessment, endorsed by the Senate Teaching and Learning Committee in June 2025, and it frames AI literacies, assessment integrity, and AI-enabled innovation as its roadmap.
3+Evidence (en, 1a87bdd25ea5): UCT has developed the UCT Framework for AI in Education: Generative and other AI in Teaching, Learning and Assessment.
4+privacy: UCT advises administrative and support staff to treat AI inputs as public and not share personal, confidential, or UCT intellectual property with publicly available AI tools.
5+Evidence (en, ce547e63b297): Treat AI inputs as public: never share personal, confidential, or UCT intellectual property with publicly available AI tools.
6+research: UCT's EiRC research guideline says researchers should use generative AI tools in the context of UCT policies and disclose AI use with a disclaimer or explanatory note describing where and how it was used.
7+Evidence (en, 57b7bd43ca90): Researchers should use generative AI tools in the context of UCT policies.
8+academic_integrity: UCT says AI detection tools remain unreliable and that their use is not supported at UCT.
9+Evidence (en, 1a87bdd25ea5): AI detection tools remain unreliable and their use is not supported at UCT.
10+security_review: Before procuring generative AI tools, UCT staff or departments should consult ICTS and the tools must undergo information security and privacy risk assessment.
11+Evidence (en, ce547e63b297): Before procuring generative AI tools, staff or departments should consult with ICTS. All third-party AI tools must undergo an information security and privacy risk assessment.
12+teaching: UCT CILT publishes open-access AI guides for staff, students, and researchers, and also offers interactive AI guides on Amathuba for UCT staff and students.
13+Evidence (en, 6a98c73bc4c9): To support UCT staff and students to navigate GenAI in education, we have developed comprehensive guides accessible to anyone interested in understanding and engaging with GenAI responsibly.

Claim changes

6 claim records

research

UCT's EiRC research guideline says researchers should use generative AI tools in the context of UCT policies and disclose AI use with a disclaimer or explanatory note describing where and how it was used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence2Languagesen

teaching

UCT CILT publishes open-access AI guides for staff, students, and researchers, and also offers interactive AI guides on Amathuba for UCT staff and students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

Before procuring generative AI tools, UCT staff or departments should consult ICTS and the tools must undergo information security and privacy risk assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

UCT advises administrative and support staff to treat AI inputs as public and not share personal, confidential, or UCT intellectual property with publicly available AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

UCT says AI detection tools remain unreliable and that their use is not supported at UCT.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

UCT has published an AI in Education Framework for teaching, learning, and assessment, endorsed by the Senate Teaching and Learning Committee in June 2025, and it frames AI literacies, assessment integrity, and AI-enabled innovation as its roadmap.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

5 source attributions

Artificial Intelligence

official_guidance checked May 14, 2026

Source URL: https://cilt.uct.ac.za/artificial-intelligence
Snapshot hash: 1a87bdd25ea52ca89afc52d8bdd5f0befd859f0e771fd3334d22540bcb7842f2

Artificial Intelligence for Teaching & Learning

official_guidance checked May 14, 2026

Source URL: https://cilt.uct.ac.za/teaching-resources/artificial-intelligence-teaching-learning
Snapshot hash: 6a98c73bc4c9440e169f797cc7c1c6ff59ba13a61c023e1b2f15f208df853a1a

Guidelines and recommendations for the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in research

official_pdf checked May 14, 2026

Source URL: https://uct.ac.za/sites/default/files/media/documents/uct_ac_za/87/EiRC_GenerativeAI_guideline_Oct2023_final.pdf
Snapshot hash: 57b7bd43ca90937eb7be93bf9b98f1cf35c8239da8b3fb7ef3d8083a2313db1f

Responsible use of generative AI Tools at UCT for administrative and support staff

official_guidance checked May 14, 2026

Source URL: https://icts.uct.ac.za/ai-guidelines-support-admin-staff
Snapshot hash: ce547e63b2976829a81c265b8cece6c399be992de2257c3c07a109eebdd994a1

UCT Ethics in Research Committee (EiRC) guidelines and recommendations for the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in research

official_guidance checked May 14, 2026

Source URL: https://ai.uct.ac.za/uct-ethics-research-committee-eirc-guidelines-and-recommendations-use-generative-artificial
Snapshot hash: 3899e302008606034d6c34c6d4bcadd2468417b32ac7ab6402c8741f64a1fe7c

University of Cape Town

Change summary

Claim/evidence diff preview