privacy
The University of Tennessee system AI policy says protected university data must not be entered into AI technology that has not been reviewed by the University CIO or designee and authorized for use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for The University of Tennessee, Knoxville. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+12-0
11 # The University of Tennessee, Knoxville AI policy record
2+privacy: The University of Tennessee system AI policy says protected university data must not be entered into AI technology that has not been reviewed by the University CIO or designee and authorized for use.
3+Evidence (en-US, 30c1850329fb): Protected University Data shall not be entered into AI technology that has not been reviewed by the University’s Chief Information Officer (or designee) and authorized for use.
4+academic_integrity: The University of Tennessee system AI policy says course-related communications must inform students that unpermitted AI use is a form of academic misconduct subject to the campus student code of conduct.
5+Evidence (en-US, 30c1850329fb): Course-related communications pertaining to the use of AI technology shall: (i) affirm the importance of academic honesty; and (ii) inform Students that the unpermitted use of AI technology is a form of academic misconduct.
6+teaching: The University of Tennessee system AI policy, which includes UT Knoxville, expects course faculty or staff to communicate permitted AI uses for a course and says students are responsible for following those course-specific AI requirements.
7+Evidence (en-US, 30c1850329fb): Faculty/Staff Members responsible for the delivery of a course are expected to clearly communicate to Students the permitted use(s), if any, of AI technology in connection with a course.
8+teaching: UTK Writing Center guidance tells students that when an instructor allows GenAI for writing assignments, they should use it to assist rather than replace their writing process and should document and describe the use.
9+Evidence (en-US, 7830749d0ff5): If your instructor allows you to use GenAI for writing assignments, use it to assist rather than replace your research and writing processes, and always document and describe your use.
10+ai_tool_treatment: UTK Writing Center guidance says instructors may set different GenAI rules for each course, and the sample syllabus page presents open, moderate, and strict AI-use guideline examples.
11+Evidence (en-US, 7830749d0ff5): Read each instructor’s policy on using GenAI (found on the course syllabus), and follow each carefully. UTK instructors may make their own rules about whether and how you can use GenAI in their course.
12+academic_integrity: UTK Libraries guidance says submitting generative-AI-created or rewritten assessment work as one's own is cheating, and advises students to check with professors and instructors about coursework use.
13+Evidence (en, 866424276138): Getting a generative AI to create or re-write your assessment and then submitting that work as your own, is cheating. It is the same as asking another human to do your work for you.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
6 claim records
academic_integrity
The University of Tennessee system AI policy says course-related communications must inform students that unpermitted AI use is a form of academic misconduct subject to the campus student code of conduct.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
The University of Tennessee system AI policy, which includes UT Knoxville, expects course faculty or staff to communicate permitted AI uses for a course and says students are responsible for following those course-specific AI requirements.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
UTK Writing Center guidance tells students that when an instructor allows GenAI for writing assignments, they should use it to assist rather than replace their writing process and should document and describe the use.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
UTK Writing Center guidance says instructors may set different GenAI rules for each course, and the sample syllabus page presents open, moderate, and strict AI-use guideline examples.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
UTK Libraries guidance says submitting generative-AI-created or rewritten assessment work as one's own is cheating, and advises students to check with professors and instructors about coursework use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
BT0035 - Policy on Artificial Intelligence
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 4:34 AM
GenAI Tools and Writing: Information and Guidelines for Students
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 4:34 AM
Sample syllabus statements for AI Guidelines
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 4:34 AM
Using Generative AI: Ethical & Evaluative Use
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 4:34 AM