privacy
The University of Tennessee system AI policy says protected university data must not be entered into AI technology that has not been reviewed by the University CIO or designee and authorized for use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+12-0
11 # The University of Tennessee, Knoxville AI policy record
2+privacy: The University of Tennessee system AI policy says protected university data must not be entered into AI technology that has not been reviewed by the University CIO or designee and authorized for use.
3+Evidence (en-US, 30c1850329fb): Protected University Data shall not be entered into AI technology that has not been reviewed by the University’s Chief Information Officer (or designee) and authorized for use.
4+academic_integrity: The University of Tennessee system AI policy says course-related communications must inform students that unpermitted AI use is a form of academic misconduct subject to the campus student code of conduct.
5+Evidence (en-US, 30c1850329fb): Course-related communications pertaining to the use of AI technology shall: (i) affirm the importance of academic honesty; and (ii) inform Students that the unpermitted use of AI technology is a form of academic misconduct.
6+teaching: The University of Tennessee system AI policy, which includes UT Knoxville, expects course faculty or staff to communicate permitted AI uses for a course and says students are responsible for following those course-specific AI requirements.
7+Evidence (en-US, 30c1850329fb): Faculty/Staff Members responsible for the delivery of a course are expected to clearly communicate to Students the permitted use(s), if any, of AI technology in connection with a course.
8+teaching: UTK Writing Center guidance tells students that when an instructor allows GenAI for writing assignments, they should use it to assist rather than replace their writing process and should document and describe the use.
9+Evidence (en-US, 7830749d0ff5): If your instructor allows you to use GenAI for writing assignments, use it to assist rather than replace your research and writing processes, and always document and describe your use.
10+ai_tool_treatment: UTK Writing Center guidance says instructors may set different GenAI rules for each course, and the sample syllabus page presents open, moderate, and strict AI-use guideline examples.
11+Evidence (en-US, 7830749d0ff5): Read each instructor’s policy on using GenAI (found on the course syllabus), and follow each carefully. UTK instructors may make their own rules about whether and how you can use GenAI in their course.
12+academic_integrity: UTK Libraries guidance says submitting generative-AI-created or rewritten assessment work as one's own is cheating, and advises students to check with professors and instructors about coursework use.
13+Evidence (en, 866424276138): Getting a generative AI to create or re-write your assessment and then submitting that work as your own, is cheating. It is the same as asking another human to do your work for you.
Claim changes
6 claim records
academic_integrity
The University of Tennessee system AI policy says course-related communications must inform students that unpermitted AI use is a form of academic misconduct subject to the campus student code of conduct.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
The University of Tennessee system AI policy, which includes UT Knoxville, expects course faculty or staff to communicate permitted AI uses for a course and says students are responsible for following those course-specific AI requirements.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
UTK Writing Center guidance tells students that when an instructor allows GenAI for writing assignments, they should use it to assist rather than replace their writing process and should document and describe the use.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
UTK Writing Center guidance says instructors may set different GenAI rules for each course, and the sample syllabus page presents open, moderate, and strict AI-use guideline examples.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
UTK Libraries guidance says submitting generative-AI-created or rewritten assessment work as one's own is cheating, and advises students to check with professors and instructors about coursework use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
BT0035 - Policy on Artificial Intelligence
official_policy_page checked May 17, 2026
GenAI Tools and Writing: Information and Guidelines for Students
official_guidance checked May 17, 2026
Sample syllabus statements for AI Guidelines
official_guidance checked May 17, 2026
Using Generative AI: Ethical & Evaluative Use
official_guidance checked May 17, 2026