privacy
The University of Tennessee system AI policy says protected university data must not be entered into AI technology that has not been reviewed by the University CIO or designee and authorized for use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
The University of Tennessee, Knoxville currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
6 claim records
academic_integrity
The University of Tennessee system AI policy says course-related communications must inform students that unpermitted AI use is a form of academic misconduct subject to the campus student code of conduct.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
The University of Tennessee system AI policy, which includes UT Knoxville, expects course faculty or staff to communicate permitted AI uses for a course and says students are responsible for following those course-specific AI requirements.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
UTK Writing Center guidance tells students that when an instructor allows GenAI for writing assignments, they should use it to assist rather than replace their writing process and should document and describe the use.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
UTK Writing Center guidance says instructors may set different GenAI rules for each course, and the sample syllabus page presents open, moderate, and strict AI-use guideline examples.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
UTK Libraries guidance says submitting generative-AI-created or rewritten assessment work as one's own is cheating, and advises students to check with professors and instructors about coursework use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
BT0035 - Policy on Artificial Intelligence
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 4:34 AM
GenAI Tools and Writing: Information and Guidelines for Students
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 4:34 AM
Sample syllabus statements for AI Guidelines
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 4:34 AM
Using Generative AI: Ethical & Evaluative Use
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 4:34 AM