teaching
Ohio State Arts and Sciences guidance provides sample course-level prohibition language stating students are not permitted to use AI tools in a course when that is the instructor's policy.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
The Ohio State University
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
The Ohio State University currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 26, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
9 claim records
teaching
Ohio State guidance says instructors who permit AI should provide clear and precise parameters about tools, features, assignments, activities, and allowable use.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
Ohio State responsible-use guidance says students should use GenAI tools for coursework only with the explicit permission of each instructor, and only in the ways allowed by that instructor.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Ohio State Arts and Sciences guidance quotes the OSU Committee on Academic Misconduct policy that generative AI tools should not be used to complete course assignments unless the course instructor specifically authorizes their use.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Ohio State teaching guidance says data entered in AI applications using a personal account will not be protected, and users must log in to an approved AI tool with Ohio State credentials before entering institutional data above S1.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
Ohio State OTDI guidance says unvetted AI tools should not receive institutional data above S1, and users should enter only the data necessary when using approved AI tools with institutional data.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Ohio State responsible-use guidance says public GenAI prompts should be considered public and used to train AI models, while prompts and results in Ohio State-provided Copilot Chat, Gemini, and Microsoft 365 Copilot are protected inside OSU's environment and not used to train public AI models.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Ohio State teaching guidance recommends that instructors establish expectations for academic integrity and AI use early, include university academic-integrity policies in the syllabus, and communicate course-specific GenAI expectations.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
Ohio State teaching guidance says the university has reviewed and vetted standalone generative AI applications for faculty, staff, and students, including Microsoft Copilot, Adobe Firefly, and Google Gemini.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
AI Considerations for Teaching and Learning | Teaching and Learning Resource Center
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 5:01 AM
Crafting Policy for Student Use of Artificial Intelligence | ASC Office of Distance Education
official_guidance Source Last-Modified May 22, 2026, 8:22 PM
Responsible Use | Artificial Intelligence at Ohio State
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 5:01 AM
Security and Privacy Statement on Artificial Intelligence | Office of Technology and Digital Innovation
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 5:01 AM