Change log

KU Leuven

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

KU Leuven currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 12, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for KU Leuven. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

KU Leuven combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+16-0
11 # KU Leuven AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: KU Leuven permits and encourages responsible, critical use of generative AI in teaching and research, framing it as a complement to critical thinking and professional expertise rather than a replacement.
3+Evidence (en, 5748132da23f): KU Leuven is open to the use of generative AI (GenAI) in teaching and research, and encourages students, lecturers, researchers and staff to use this technology in a responsible and critical manner. Generative AI is a powerful tool. We use it consciously and purposefully: as a complement to, not a replacement for, critical thinking and professional expertise.
4+academic_integrity: KU Leuven student guidance says students remain fully responsible for what they submit and must ensure assignments allow teaching staff to assess their acquired competences.
5+Evidence (en, e40b1ab53f24): 2 basic principles apply for students : A student has full responsibility for what they submit; You make sure that the assignment allows the teaching staff to evaluate which competences you have acquired as a student.
6+academic_integrity: KU Leuven student guidance says clear misuse of GenAI, where output is largely generated by GenAI and the student is not transparent about tool use, can be considered an irregularity under Article 84 of the Education and Examination Regulations.
7+Evidence (en, e40b1ab53f24): A clear misuse of GenAI - where any output was largely generated by GenAI and you were not transparent about using the tool - can be considered an irregularity under Article 84 of the Education and Examination Regulations (OER).
8+teaching: KU Leuven teaching guidance expects teaching staff to clearly inform students whether GenAI may be used for assignments and expects students to be transparent about GenAI use so assessment can be fair and correct.
9+Evidence (en, 7ababb8b4225): Teaching staff are expected to clearly inform students about whether or not they are allowed to use GenAI for assignments such as visual, writing and programming assignments. Students are expected to be transparent about the use of GenAI so that their knowledge, understanding and skills can be assessed fairly and correctly.
10+security_review: KU Leuven identifies Copilot logged in with a KU Leuven account as its recommended GenAI tool, citing contractual data protection, Enterprise technical security, and Microsoft not using entered data for further training.
11+Evidence (en, 5748132da23f): Copilot is the preferred tool at KU Leuven. KU Leuven has a contractual agreement with Microsoft that also covers data protection. In addition, our Enterprise environment provides the best technical security, Microsoft does not use entered data for further training, and ICTS ensures the correct settings for all logged-in users.
12+privacy: KU Leuven guidance says strictly confidential data should use only Copilot logged in with a KU Leuven account, and confidential or strictly confidential data require a security check if another AI tool is needed.
13+Evidence (en, 5748132da23f): For (strictly) confidential data: use only Copilot logged in with your KU Leuven account. For other data: choose consciously, not automatically. For non-confidential data, you may use other AI tools. For confidential or strictly confidential data, a security check of the tool is mandatory.
14+privacy: KU Leuven safe-use guidance warns users to be careful with unsupported AI tools and not to enter personal data, confidential information, IP-sensitive data, or copyrighted material.
15+Evidence (en, f68c9f404080): Online, you will find an awful lot of AI tools and more appear every day. Some of those tools are completely unreliable. Therefore, be extra careful when using unsupported tools and when sharing your data. Never fill in personal data, confidential (company) information like IP sensitive data and/or copyrighted material
16+research: KU Leuven research guidance says GenAI use needs to be reported transparently whenever new output is generated in scientific publications, project applications, or doctoral theses.
17+Evidence (en, cc24c98e41ff): Transparency about the use of GenAI in scientific publications, project applications and doctoral theses The use of GenAI needs to be reported in a transparent manner whenever new output is generated.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

8 claim records

research

KU Leuven research guidance says GenAI use needs to be reported transparently whenever new output is generated in scientific publications, project applications, or doctoral theses.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

KU Leuven safe-use guidance warns users to be careful with unsupported AI tools and not to enter personal data, confidential information, IP-sensitive data, or copyrighted material.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

KU Leuven guidance says strictly confidential data should use only Copilot logged in with a KU Leuven account, and confidential or strictly confidential data require a security check if another AI tool is needed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

KU Leuven identifies Copilot logged in with a KU Leuven account as its recommended GenAI tool, citing contractual data protection, Enterprise technical security, and Microsoft not using entered data for further training.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

KU Leuven teaching guidance expects teaching staff to clearly inform students whether GenAI may be used for assignments and expects students to be transparent about GenAI use so assessment can be fair and correct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

KU Leuven student guidance says clear misuse of GenAI, where output is largely generated by GenAI and the student is not transparent about tool use, can be considered an irregularity under Article 84 of the Education and Examination Regulations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

KU Leuven student guidance says students remain fully responsible for what they submit and must ensure assignments allow teaching staff to assess their acquired competences.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

KU Leuven permits and encourages responsible, critical use of generative AI in teaching and research, framing it as a complement to critical thinking and professional expertise rather than a replacement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

5 source attributions

Generative AI at KU Leuven

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 12, 2026, 2:40 PM

Snapshot hash
5748132da23f133c50940ae5106cc2b9a5637eff8d7563e51092e69d769c1a58