research
KU Leuven research guidance says GenAI use needs to be reported transparently whenever new output is generated in scientific publications, project applications, or doctoral theses.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
KU Leuven
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
KU Leuven currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 12, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
8 claim records
privacy
KU Leuven safe-use guidance warns users to be careful with unsupported AI tools and not to enter personal data, confidential information, IP-sensitive data, or copyrighted material.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
KU Leuven guidance says strictly confidential data should use only Copilot logged in with a KU Leuven account, and confidential or strictly confidential data require a security check if another AI tool is needed.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
KU Leuven identifies Copilot logged in with a KU Leuven account as its recommended GenAI tool, citing contractual data protection, Enterprise technical security, and Microsoft not using entered data for further training.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
KU Leuven teaching guidance expects teaching staff to clearly inform students whether GenAI may be used for assignments and expects students to be transparent about GenAI use so assessment can be fair and correct.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
KU Leuven student guidance says clear misuse of GenAI, where output is largely generated by GenAI and the student is not transparent about tool use, can be considered an irregularity under Article 84 of the Education and Examination Regulations.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
KU Leuven student guidance says students remain fully responsible for what they submit and must ensure assignments allow teaching staff to assess their acquired competences.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
KU Leuven permits and encourages responsible, critical use of generative AI in teaching and research, framing it as a complement to critical thinking and professional expertise rather than a replacement.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
5 source attributions
Generative AI at KU Leuven
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 12, 2026, 2:40 PM
Guidelines for safe use of GenAI tools
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 12, 2026, 2:40 PM
Responsible use of Generative AI in our education
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 12, 2026, 2:40 PM
Responsible use of generative Artificial Intelligence
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 12, 2026, 2:40 PM
Using generative artificial intelligence as a researcher
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 12, 2026, 2:40 PM