privacy
CSU's AI Tools page says other AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or Anthropic Claude may be used for non-sensitive public information only.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Colorado State University
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Colorado State University currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
8 claim records
privacy
CSU-GPT is described by CSU as operating inside CSU's Microsoft Azure environment, keeping data, prompts, and uploads inside the university's Microsoft Azure tenant.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
CSU's AI Tools page lists CSU-GPT, Microsoft Copilot Chat with CSU NetID, and Microsoft Teams Premium as currently approved tools for handling sensitive CSU data.
Review: Agent reviewed
source_status
The CSU System AI Governance Guidelines state that they apply to individuals handling institutional data or using AI tools in administrative operations, research, clinical, and educational activities across the CSU system.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
CSU's Student Resolution Center defines cheating to include unauthorized sources or assistance and instructor-prohibited behavior, and defines plagiarism as representing another's language, structure, images, ideas, or thoughts as one's own without proper acknowledgment.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
For CSU System internal, confidential, and restricted data classifications, the AI Governance Guidelines say users should verify data classification, follow applicable policies, and use CSU-approved tools; restricted data also requires additional approval for AI use.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
CSU TILT guidance says AI syllabus statements should remain consistent with university and department policy on assessing student work and provide students clarity about instructor expectations.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
An official CSU MTI teaching page states that work submitted for credit that was created by AI engines can be addressed under multiple areas of the Academic Misconduct section of the Student Conduct Code.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
6 source attributions
Academic Misconduct - Student Resolution Center
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 10:56 PM
AI Governance Guidelines | Data Governance
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 10:54 PM
AI Syllabus Statements & the CSU Conduct Code
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 10:52 PM
AI Tools | AI @ CSU | Colorado State University
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 10:53 PM
CSU-GPT | AI @ CSU | Colorado State University
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 10:51 PM
What should a syllabus statement on AI look like? | The Institute for Learning and Teaching
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 10:47 PM