academic_integrity
Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Birkbeck, University of London
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Birkbeck, University of London currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
4 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should use AI tools, including generative AI, only to the extent outlined in the assessment brief, and should not use them where the brief explicitly does not permit them.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should retain evidence of their use of AI tools, such as transcripts or screenshots of prompts and outputs, because it may be requested if work is flagged for possible academic misconduct.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Birkbeck's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy includes using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to create assessment content or argument presented as the student's own intellectual work within its description of contract cheating, unless generative AI use is permitted in the assessment brief with guidance.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
2 source attributions
Academic Integrity and Misconduct (AIM) Policy and Procedures
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 6:36 PM
AI guidance for students, 2025-26 academic year
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 6:36 PM