記録履歴

University of Oxford

このサイトの審査済み記録の更新であり、大学が方針を変更したことを確認するものではありません。

トラッカーの公開時刻は、大学の政策の発効日ではありません。

一致するリビジョン: 5

  1. ページの更新

    ページの更新

    改訂: v6-reading-rankings-ten-20261027
    改訂を表示
    その他の記録 · ページの更新

    ページの更新

    比較可能な旧テキストと新テキストは入手できません。

    新しいテキスト

    Shared V6 reading layout and evidence presentation updated. University policy Claims, original evidence, held decisions and snapshot approvals remain unchanged; the institution audit remains PARTIAL.

    改訂履歴を開く
  2. サイトの訂正

    関係する記録:1 (1件 修正・調整済み)

    改訂: v6-audit-fix-20261014
    改訂を表示

    今回の記録更新の意味

    構造化された記録の概要

    関係する記録:1 (1件 修正・調整済み)

    開示 · 研究と出版

    この改訂については、独自にレビューされた要約がまだ利用できません。

    これは過去の記録の要約であり、現在の許可や新しい大学規則の確認ではありません。

    開示 · 関係する記録:1 (1件 修正・調整済み)

    サイトの訂正

    比較可能な旧テキストと新テキストは入手できません。

    旧テキスト

    For MPLS postgraduate research summative assessment, local editing and debugging tools are permitted without declaration. Background research, translation, bibliography indexes and general understanding are allowed without declaration. AI coding is permitted when it serves a research purpose and is not the substantive project output; students remain responsible for correctness and should declare AI-generated code, excluding debugging.

    新しいテキスト

    For MPLS postgraduate research summative assessment, local editing and debugging tools are permitted without declaration. Background research, translation, bibliography indexes and general understanding are allowed without declaration. AI coding is permitted when it serves a research purpose and is not the substantive project output; students remain responsible for correctness and should declare AI-generated code, excluding debugging.

    改訂履歴を開く
  3. サイトの訂正 · 記録の追加

    関係する記録:16 (15件 修正・調整済み · 1 を追加)

    改訂: oxford-20261011-codex
    改訂を表示

    今回の記録更新の意味

    構造化された記録の概要

    関係する記録:16 (15件 修正・調整済み · 1 を追加)

    AIツールの扱い · その他の記録 · さらに3件のトピック

    この改訂については、独自にレビューされた要約がまだ利用できません。

    これは過去の記録の要約であり、現在の許可や新しい大学規則の確認ではありません。

    学術的誠実性 · 関係する記録:7 (7件 修正・調整済み)

    サイトの訂正

    サイトの結論文テキストの変更
    旧テキスト

    Staff setting summative assessment must: declare whether/how students can use AI; review assessment design for alignment with permitted AI use; ensure equality of baseline AI tool provision where authorised; specify declaration forms for student AI use; only identify suspected unauthorised AI use through marking or university-endorsed detection tools (none currently endorsed); and handle misconduct under usual disciplinary regulations.

    新しいテキスト

    Staff setting summative assessment must: declare whether/how students can use AI; review assessment design for alignment with permitted AI use; ensure equality of baseline AI tool provision where authorised; specify declaration forms for student AI use; only identify suspected unauthorised AI use through marking or university-endorsed detection tools (the public page says none had received endorsement at its last update); and handle misconduct under usual disciplinary regulations.

    サイトの訂正

    比較可能な旧テキストと新テキストは入手できません。

    旧テキスト

    Students undertaking summative assessment must: complete assessment in line with the AI use declaration for each assignment; acknowledge their AI use via a formal declaration in the prescribed format; and understand that submitting work breaching AI specifications constitutes cheating and may constitute plagiarism, handled under usual disciplinary regulations.

    新しいテキスト

    Students undertaking summative assessment must: complete assessment in line with the AI use declaration for each assignment; acknowledge their AI use via a formal declaration in the prescribed format; and understand that submitting work breaching AI specifications constitutes cheating and may constitute plagiarism, handled under usual disciplinary regulations.

    サイトの訂正

    サイトの結論文テキストの変更
    旧テキスト

    Oxford requires postgraduate research students to include a statement on their use of generative AI in their final thesis submission.

    新しいテキスト

    MPLS guidance for DPhil and MSc by Research summative assessment requires a statement on GenAI use in the final thesis for submissions from Trinity Term 2026. The statement goes immediately after the abstract and covers compliance, uses and referencing. This is MPLS guidance, not proof of an identical rule in every division.

    サイトの訂正

    サイトの結論文テキストの変更
    旧テキスト

    For PGR summative assessment (transfer, confirmation, thesis), the following AI uses are permitted without declaration: local editing tools (grammar assistants, spell-checkers, code debuggers making small local changes); AI for background research, language translation, bibliography creation, and general subject understanding; and AI for coding where coding serves a research purpose but is not the substantive output. Students remain responsible for correctness of any code used.

    新しいテキスト

    For MPLS postgraduate research summative assessment, local editing and debugging tools are permitted without declaration. Background research, translation, bibliography indexes and general understanding are allowed without declaration. AI coding is permitted when it serves a research purpose and is not the substantive project output; students remain responsible for correctness and should declare AI-generated code, excluding debugging.

    サイトの訂正

    サイトの結論文テキストの変更
    旧テキスト

    For PGR students, the following uses of generative AI are not permitted in summative assessments: substantive original writing by GenAI (verbatim or closely paraphrased for chapters or parts thereof) which constitutes plagiarism; using AI to produce plots or data visualisations directly from prompts; and entering private or confidential data into third-party AI tools.

    新しいテキスト

    MPLS postgraduate research guidance prohibits substantive AI-written thesis content, including close paraphrases, and producing plots or data visualisations directly from prompts. It distinguishes refining plotting code from generating research results. Confidential/private data use remains subject to applicable University data rules and approved institutional services.

    サイトの訂正

    サイトの結論文テキストの変更
    旧テキスト

    Unauthorised use of generative AI falls under the University's plagiarism regulations and is subject to academic penalties in summative assessments. Students must learn and practise academic skills of note-taking and clear attribution to differentiate their own work from AI-derived material. Where AI use is authorised, students should give clear acknowledgment of how it has been used.

    新しいテキスト

    Oxford’s public summative-assessment policy says work breaching the assignment’s AI specifications constitutes cheating and may constitute plagiarism; suspected misuse is handled under usual disciplinary regulations and processes. It does not establish an AI-specific penalty.

    サイトの訂正

    比較可能な旧テキストと新テキストは入手できません。

    旧テキスト

    The University's policy on AI use in summative assessment is based on three principles endorsed by Education Committee in Trinity term 2025: (1) educational practice must be grounded in values of integrity, honesty and transparency, which must be clearly articulated and frequently discussed; (2) every discrete unit of assessment must be carefully designed to be fit for its specific purposes, clearly articulated to students; (3) every summative assessment must be accompanied by a clear explanation of what appropriate assistance is permitted and what is forbidden, specifying how students should report assistance received.

    新しいテキスト

    The University's policy on AI use in summative assessment is based on three principles endorsed by Education Committee in Trinity term 2025: (1) educational practice must be grounded in values of integrity, honesty and transparency, which must be clearly articulated and frequently discussed; (2) every discrete unit of assessment must be carefully designed to be fit for its specific purposes, clearly articulated to students; (3) every summative assessment must be accompanied by a clear explanation of what appropriate assistance is permitted and what is forbidden, specifying how students should report assistance received.

    研究 · 関係する記録:1 (1 を追加)

    記録の追加

    追加

    Oxford’s research policy says users of a discrete GenAI tool should declare substantive use in their work. Where relevant they must make prompts and outputs available under open research principles. Its scope defines exclusions for certain assistance tasks; assessment research must also meet summative-assessment rules.

    AIツールの扱い · 関係する記録:4 (4件 修正・調整済み)

    サイトの訂正

    サイトの結論文テキストの変更
    旧テキスト

    ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

    新しいテキスト

    Oxford’s public AI Competency Centre tool guide lists ChatGPT Edu as a University SSO platform with a Confidential TPSA rating. Standard access is listed as free; Microsoft 365 Copilot and Google Gemini Pro are separate paid products. The guide has moved to OxIntranet and is no longer maintained; check successor guidance for current terms. Tool access is not assessment permission.

    サイトの訂正

    サイトの結論文テキストの変更
    旧テキスト

    Codex is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

    新しいテキスト

    Oxford’s public AI Competency Centre tool guide lists Codex as a University SSO platform with a Confidential TPSA rating. Standard access is listed as free; Microsoft 365 Copilot and Google Gemini Pro are separate paid products. The guide has moved to OxIntranet and is no longer maintained; check successor guidance for current terms. Tool access is not assessment permission.

    サイトの訂正

    サイトの結論文テキストの変更
    旧テキスト

    Google Gemini is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

    新しいテキスト

    Oxford’s public AI Competency Centre tool guide lists Google Gemini as a University SSO platform with a Confidential TPSA rating. Standard access is listed as free; Microsoft 365 Copilot and Google Gemini Pro are separate paid products. The guide has moved to OxIntranet and is no longer maintained; check successor guidance for current terms. Tool access is not assessment permission.

    サイトの訂正

    サイトの結論文テキストの変更
    旧テキスト

    Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

    新しいテキスト

    Oxford’s public AI Competency Centre tool guide lists Microsoft Copilot Chat as a University SSO platform with a Confidential TPSA rating. Standard access is listed as free; Microsoft 365 Copilot and Google Gemini Pro are separate paid products. The guide has moved to OxIntranet and is no longer maintained; check successor guidance for current terms. Tool access is not assessment permission.

    情報源のステータス · 関係する記録:3 (3件 修正・調整済み)

    サイトの訂正

    サイトの結論文テキストの変更
    旧テキスト

    External custom GPTs should not be used to process confidential University data or sensitive personal data. No non-public University data (including confidential, internal, or personal data) may be incorporated in any custom GPT shared with external users.

    新しいテキスト

    The former Oxford public Information Security URL cited for external custom GPT use now says the content has moved. The earlier recorded guidance is historical and is not current approval or prohibition. Consult successor Cyber Security/OxIntranet guidance; current detailed conditions could not be independently retrieved.

    サイトの訂正

    サイトの結論文テキストの変更
    旧テキスト

    All cloud-based generative AI tools must be subject to a security risk assessment before being used with University information. Free and open-source services generally cannot complete a full assessment and should not be used for confidential information.

    新しいテキスト

    The former Oxford public Information Security URL cited for cloud-AI security assessment now says the content has moved. The earlier recorded guidance is historical and is not current approval or prohibition. Consult successor Cyber Security/OxIntranet guidance; current detailed conditions could not be independently retrieved.

    サイトの訂正

    サイトの結論文テキストの変更
    旧テキスト

    Unapproved AI transcription bots should not be used in Teams meetings. The inbuilt Teams Transcription facility or Microsoft Copilot may be used subject to appropriate data protection considerations. Other AI transcription bot services should be avoided, and meeting organisers should set options to prevent participants from adding unapproved transcription bots.

    新しいテキスト

    The former Oxford public Information Security URL cited for AI transcription bots now says the content has moved. The earlier recorded guidance is historical and is not current approval or prohibition. Consult successor Cyber Security/OxIntranet guidance; current detailed conditions could not be independently retrieved.

    その他の記録 · 関係する記録:1 (1件 修正・調整済み)

    サイトの訂正

    サイトの結論文テキストの変更
    旧テキスト

    ChatGPT Edu and Google Gemini, when licensed via the AI Competency Centre, have been approved for processing of Confidential University data by the Information Security team. University data processed through these licensed platforms will not be used to train AI models. Confidential data must only be used with the University's approved, SSO-protected platforms.

    新しいテキスト

    The public Oxford AI Competency Centre guide lists ChatGPT Edu, Codex, Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot Chat with Confidential TPSA ratings and University SSO. It now states that the public guide is no longer maintained and points to successor University guidance. This does not approve GitHub Copilot or personal consumer accounts.

    改訂履歴を開く
  4. 過去の記録・理由未分類 · 記録の追加

    関係する記録:11 (4 を追加)

    改訂: public-release-20260715-005
    改訂を表示

    今回の記録更新の意味

    構造化された記録の概要

    関係する記録:11 (4 を追加)

    AIツールの扱い

    この改訂については、独自にレビューされた要約がまだ利用できません。

    これは過去の記録の要約であり、現在の許可や新しい大学規則の確認ではありません。

    AIツールの扱い · 関係する記録:11 (4 を追加)

    過去の記録・理由未分類

    比較可能な旧テキストと新テキストは入手できません。

    旧テキスト

    ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    記録の追加

    追加

    ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

    過去の記録・理由未分類

    比較可能な旧テキストと新テキストは入手できません。

    旧テキスト

    Codex is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    記録の追加

    追加

    Codex is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

    過去の記録・理由未分類

    比較可能な旧テキストと新テキストは入手できません。

    旧テキスト

    Google Gemini is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    記録の追加

    追加

    Google Gemini is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

    過去の記録・理由未分類

    比較可能な旧テキストと新テキストは入手できません。

    旧テキスト

    nebulaONE Platform is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    過去の記録・理由未分類

    比較可能な旧テキストと新テキストは入手できません。

    旧テキスト

    Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    記録の追加

    追加

    Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

    過去の記録・理由未分類

    比較可能な旧テキストと新テキストは入手できません。

    旧テキスト

    Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    過去の記録・理由未分類

    比較可能な旧テキストと新テキストは入手できません。

    旧テキスト

    NotebookLM is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    改訂履歴を開く
  5. 記録の追加

    関係する記録:7 (7 を追加)

    改訂: public-release-20260614-001
    改訂を表示

    今回の記録更新の意味

    構造化された記録の概要

    関係する記録:7 (7 を追加)

    AIツールの扱い

    この改訂については、独自にレビューされた要約がまだ利用できません。

    これは過去の記録の要約であり、現在の許可や新しい大学規則の確認ではありません。

    AIツールの扱い · 関係する記録:7 (7 を追加)

    記録の追加

    追加

    ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    記録の追加

    追加

    Codex is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    記録の追加

    追加

    Google Gemini is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    記録の追加

    追加

    nebulaONE Platform is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    記録の追加

    追加

    Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    記録の追加

    追加

    Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    記録の追加

    追加

    NotebookLM is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    改訂履歴を開く

記録に理由が示されていない場合、過去の理由は未分類のままとなります。

過去の証拠または分類は不完全です。改訂履歴を参照してください。

大学のページ履歴JSON