Policy presence
University of Reading has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Reading, United Kingdom
University of Reading has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
University of Reading has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
University of Reading has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
University of Reading has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
University of Reading has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Reading has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
University of Reading has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
University of Reading has 4 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
University of Reading
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat","description":"University of Reading DTS supports and recommends Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat for day-to-day work.","howToObtain":"Use the freely available Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat service.","costToUser":"Freely available according to the cited University page.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Digital Technology Services can only provide technical help for Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat. It is freely available.
Affichage localise only
Digital Technology Services can only provide technical help for Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat. It is freely available.
Evidence originale
Evidence 2Microsoft Copilot Chat is recommended for day-to-day use at work, and DTS will provide basic support to colleagues with using it.
Affichage localise only
Microsoft Copilot Chat is recommended for day-to-day use at work, and DTS will provide basic support to colleagues with using it.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: three GenAI assessment categories: Category 1 prohibited; Category 2 permitted to aid development of the assessment; Category 3 encouraged and evaluated
Evidence originale
Evidence 1Category 1 prohibits any GenAI use; Category 2 permits GenAI as a tool to aid development of the assessment; Category 3 actively encourages and evaluates GenAI use.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: GenAI misuse is a form of cheating
Evidence originale
Evidence 1The misuse of Generative AI is a form of cheating.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: silent assignment brief means assume Category 1
Evidence originale
Evidence 1If the assignment brief says nothing about GenAI, assume its Category 1.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: DeepSeek blocked on University devices and networks
Evidence originale
Evidence 1DeepSeek is blocked and must not be used on University devices or networks.
Privacy
Normalized value: M365 Copilot Chat should not be used with personal or personal sensitive data
Evidence originale
Evidence 1you should not use it for any data set containing personal or personal sensitive data.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: check module convenor before using GenAI for assessed work
Evidence originale
Evidence 1For assessed work, you should always first check with the module convenor whether use of Generative AI is permitted.
0 machine or needs-review claim
7 source attribution
reading.ac.uk
reading.ac.uk
reading.ac.uk
reading.ac.uk
reading.ac.uk
libguides.reading.ac.uk
reading.ac.uk