Microsoft Copilot Basic is listed for Aarhus University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.
The main rule is that you are allowed to use GAI if your academic regulations or the course catalogue doesn’t explicitly state that using GAI is not allowed.
Aarhus University student guidance says the main rule is that students are allowed to use GAI unless their academic regulations or the course catalogue explicitly state that GAI is not allowed.
If you use part of a text or another output generated by a GAI application in your exam project without changing it, you must cite it in the same way you cite quotations from other secondary sources. If you use GAI in your exam project, you must submit a declaration that contains the following: 1) confirmation you used GAI, 2) the name of the GAI applications you used (ChatGPT, Copilot, Bing etc. and 3) an explanation of how you used the applications in your paper.
Aarhus University student guidance says students who use GAI in an exam project must submit a declaration naming the applications and explaining how they were used, and unchanged GAI output used in an exam project must be cited like other secondary-source quotations.
claim-aarhus-student-gai-declaration-citation
Rules for using GAI, citation and declaration bullets
The main rule is that you are allowed to use GAI if your academic regulations or the course catalogue doesn’t explicitly state that using GAI is not allowed.
Aarhus University student guidance says the main rule is that students are allowed to use GAI unless their academic regulations or the course catalogue explicitly state that GAI is not allowed.
If you’re not allowed to use GAI for the exam in question, you are not allowed to use GAI to proofread and give you feedback on your exam text. Exams where the internet is allowed, but AI is not allowed, you are allowed to do regular web searches, but you are not allowed to actively use AI functions.
Aarhus University student guidance says that when GAI is not allowed for an exam, students are not allowed to use GAI for proofreading or feedback on the exam text, and for internet-allowed exams where GAI is not allowed students may do regular web searches but may not actively use AI functions.
claim-aarhus-student-gai-prohibited-exam-use
Rules for using GAI, Proofreading and feedback; Exams where the internet is allowed but GAI is not allowed
Microsoft Copilot Basic is listed for Aarhus University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.
From the fall of 2024, students are allowed to use generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in all exams at AU unless it is explicitly stated in the academic regulations or course description that they may not. The new rules have been implemented in the individual academic regulations and course descriptions, therefore it might be beneficial to read these and understand how it applies to your course(s).
AU Educate guidance for teaching staff says that from fall 2024 students are allowed to use GAI in all AU exams unless academic regulations or the course description explicitly state that they may not, and it advises teachers to read those rules for their courses.
If you use part of a text or another output generated by a GAI application in your exam project without changing it, you must cite it in the same way you cite quotations from other secondary sources. If you use GAI in your exam project, you must submit a declaration that contains the following: 1) confirmation you used GAI, 2) the name of the GAI applications you used (ChatGPT, Copilot, Bing etc. and 3) an explanation of how you used the applications in your paper.
Aarhus University student guidance says students who use GAI in an exam project must submit a declaration naming the applications and explaining how they were used, and unchanged GAI output used in an exam project must be cited like other secondary-source quotations.
claim-aarhus-student-gai-declaration-citation
Rules for using GAI, citation and declaration bullets
Never upload confidential or sensitive personal data (in other words, data covered by the GDPR rules) to a GAI application: you can’t be sure what will happen to the texts you upload. Make sure you understand the data protection rules, and follow them.
Aarhus University student guidance says students should never upload confidential or sensitive personal data covered by GDPR rules to a GAI application.
This means that you may not use GAI for anything involving trade secrets, confidential or sensitive data or copyrighted material. When you use GAI to generate a text or an image, you are responsible for ensuring the accuracy and quality of the content. Generally speaking, you should always consider whether crediting your use of GAI is relevant when you use GAI to generate a text, an image, a video or another product.
Aarhus University staff guidance says staff may not use GAI for trade secrets, confidential or sensitive data or copyrighted material; staff are responsible for the accuracy and quality of GAI-generated content they use or share; and GAI use should be credited where relevant.
For many of the materials that the library provides access to, such as electronic books and articles, you are not permitted to share them with AI tools. It is only permitted to use AI for text mining of a larger text corpus in an academic context, if the library's agreement with the publisher allows it. You should never upload confidential information to an AI technology.
AU Library guidance for students says many library-provided materials such as e-books and articles may not be shared with AI tools, students should never upload confidential information to AI, and AI text mining of a larger text corpus is only permitted in an academic context if the library agreement with the publisher allows it.
claim-aarhus-library-ai-copyright-data
Uploading copyright-protected material to AI; AI and confidential information
As a student, you are responsible for your use of AI in your work. If you want to use an AI tool to transcribe your interviews, you should carefully consider the entire process in relation to legality and good academic practice. Always be aware of: As a student, you are responsible for data when processing personal data and confidential information. Have your informants given consent to the processing? Consider which AI technology you are using and whether it complies with GDPR legislation.
AU Library guidance says students using AI to transcribe interviews should consider legality and good academic practice, including responsibility for personal and confidential data, informant consent, GDPR compliance, secure storage and deletion when data is no longer needed.
Microsoft Copilot Basic is listed for Aarhus University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.
The main rule is that you are allowed to use GAI if your academic regulations or the course catalogue doesn’t explicitly state that using GAI is not allowed.
Aarhus University student guidance says the main rule is that students are allowed to use GAI unless their academic regulations or the course catalogue explicitly state that GAI is not allowed.
In addition to access to all free GAI applications, all students and staff have access to the version of the Microsoft Copilot which is similar to the free version of ChatGPT. No university-wide guidelines for which GAI applications staff and students are allowed to use have been adopted. However, any purchases of systems and licenses must be carried out in collaboration between the individual unit and AU IT and AU Finance.
Aarhus University staff guidance says all students and staff have access to a Microsoft Copilot version similar to free ChatGPT, that no university-wide guidelines for which GAI applications are allowed have been adopted, and that purchases of systems and licences must be handled with the unit, AU IT and AU Finance.
claim-aarhus-staff-gai-procurement-copilot
Principle 7, GAI purchases must be handled centrally
For many of the materials that the library provides access to, such as electronic books and articles, you are not permitted to share them with AI tools. It is only permitted to use AI for text mining of a larger text corpus in an academic context, if the library's agreement with the publisher allows it. You should never upload confidential information to an AI technology.
AU Library guidance for students says many library-provided materials such as e-books and articles may not be shared with AI tools, students should never upload confidential information to AI, and AI text mining of a larger text corpus is only permitted in an academic context if the library agreement with the publisher allows it.
claim-aarhus-library-ai-copyright-data
Uploading copyright-protected material to AI; AI and confidential information
For many of the materials that the library provides access to, such as electronic books and articles, you are not permitted to share them with AI tools. It is only permitted to use AI for text mining of a larger text corpus in an academic context, if the library's agreement with the publisher allows it. You should never upload confidential information to an AI technology.
AU Library guidance for students says many library-provided materials such as e-books and articles may not be shared with AI tools, students should never upload confidential information to AI, and AI text mining of a larger text corpus is only permitted in an academic context if the library agreement with the publisher allows it.
claim-aarhus-library-ai-copyright-data
Uploading copyright-protected material to AI; AI and confidential information
If you use part of a text or another output generated by a GAI application in your exam project without changing it, you must cite it in the same way you cite quotations from other secondary sources. If you use GAI in your exam project, you must submit a declaration that contains the following: 1) confirmation you used GAI, 2) the name of the GAI applications you used (ChatGPT, Copilot, Bing etc. and 3) an explanation of how you used the applications in your paper.
Aarhus University student guidance says students who use GAI in an exam project must submit a declaration naming the applications and explaining how they were used, and unchanged GAI output used in an exam project must be cited like other secondary-source quotations.
claim-aarhus-student-gai-declaration-citation
Rules for using GAI, citation and declaration bullets
If you’re not allowed to use GAI for the exam in question, you are not allowed to use GAI to proofread and give you feedback on your exam text. Exams where the internet is allowed, but AI is not allowed, you are allowed to do regular web searches, but you are not allowed to actively use AI functions.
Aarhus University student guidance says that when GAI is not allowed for an exam, students are not allowed to use GAI for proofreading or feedback on the exam text, and for internet-allowed exams where GAI is not allowed students may do regular web searches but may not actively use AI functions.
claim-aarhus-student-gai-prohibited-exam-use
Rules for using GAI, Proofreading and feedback; Exams where the internet is allowed but GAI is not allowed
From the fall of 2024, students are allowed to use generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in all exams at AU unless it is explicitly stated in the academic regulations or course description that they may not. The new rules have been implemented in the individual academic regulations and course descriptions, therefore it might be beneficial to read these and understand how it applies to your course(s).
AU Educate guidance for teaching staff says that from fall 2024 students are allowed to use GAI in all AU exams unless academic regulations or the course description explicitly state that they may not, and it advises teachers to read those rules for their courses.
In addition to access to all free GAI applications, all students and staff have access to the version of the Microsoft Copilot which is similar to the free version of ChatGPT. No university-wide guidelines for which GAI applications staff and students are allowed to use have been adopted. However, any purchases of systems and licenses must be carried out in collaboration between the individual unit and AU IT and AU Finance.
Aarhus University staff guidance says all students and staff have access to a Microsoft Copilot version similar to free ChatGPT, that no university-wide guidelines for which GAI applications are allowed have been adopted, and that purchases of systems and licences must be handled with the unit, AU IT and AU Finance.
claim-aarhus-staff-gai-procurement-copilot
Principle 7, GAI purchases must be handled centrally
Ces résumés du site reposent sur des documents officiels conservés. Leur applicabilité actuelle n’a pas été confirmée de manière indépendante. Les résumés anglais et les citations originales sont conservés, sauf résumé chinois vérifié.
Autorisation en évaluation
Disposition explicite sur l’IA
Résumé du site · preuve originale ci-dessous
Permission depends on examination/course rules: where AI is prohibited, even feedback or proofreading through AI is prohibited. On-site examinations permitting AI are expressly exempted from the declaration requirement. AI-assisted preparation does not permit AI content in a prohibited examination answer.
The main rule is that you are allowed to use GAI if your academic regulations or the course catalogue doesn’t explicitly state that using GAI is not allowed.
What’s more, the university’s rules about academic cheating and plagiarism also apply to papers and assignments where you use GAI. Check the rules here.To be more specific, under these rules, you’re allowed to use GAI as a dialogue partner. But you’re not allowed to use GAI to do your exam project for you.
If you use part of a text or another output generated by a GAI application in your exam project without changing it, you must cite it in the same way you cite quotations from other secondary sources (Read the rules on citations here).
If you use GAI in your exam project, you must submit a declaration that contains the following: 1) confirmation you used GAI, 2) the name of the GAI applications you used (ChatGPT, Copilot, Bing etc. and 3) an explanation of how you used the applications in your paper.
You must submit the declaration as an attachment when you submit your exam project if you use GAI. The declaration must be uploaded as a separate file under ‘attachments’ in WISEflow”. To write your declaration, fill out the AU template you’ll find here. Unless you refer to your use of GAI in the methodology section of your paper, your declaration and your description of how you used GAI in the exam project will not be part of your grade.
Proofreading and feedback
If you’re allowed to use GAI for the exam in question, you must submit a declaration that you have used GAI for proofreading and feedback. This applies even though the text you include in your exam is your own work.
If you’re not allowed to use GAI for the exam in question, you are not allowed to use GAI to proofread and give you feedback on your exam text. This applies even though the text you include in your exam is your own work. For exams where using GAI is not allowed, it doesn’t matter whether the text you include is written by a chatbot or whether you write it yourself: all use of GAI/chatbots is prohibited for this type of exam.
It’s fine to use GAI for feedback and help with text that isn’t included in your exam paper. However, be very careful not to include this kind of text in your exam paper if you’re not allowed to use GAI for the exam: if you do, this will be considered unauthorised use of an exam aid.
In on-site exams where GAI is allowed, you are not required to submit a declaration.
Exams where the internet is allowed, but GAI is not allowed
Exams where the internet is allowed, but AI is not allowed, you are allowed to do regular web searches, but you are not allowed to actively use AI functions. It is not considered cheating if your search engine automatically displays an AI-generated answer at the top of the search results - as long as you do not use the AI answer in your exam answer
Where permitted, students must declare the tool and its use in a separate WISEflow attachment, including proofreading/feedback on their own text. Direct unchanged generated output is cited as a quotation. On-site examinations that allow AI do not require the declaration.
If you use part of a text or another output generated by a GAI application in your exam project without changing it, you must cite it in the same way you cite quotations from other secondary sources (Read the rules on citations here).
If you use GAI in your exam project, you must submit a declaration that contains the following: 1) confirmation you used GAI, 2) the name of the GAI applications you used (ChatGPT, Copilot, Bing etc. and 3) an explanation of how you used the applications in your paper.
You must submit the declaration as an attachment when you submit your exam project if you use GAI. The declaration must be uploaded as a separate file under ‘attachments’ in WISEflow”. To write your declaration, fill out the AU template you’ll find here. Unless you refer to your use of GAI in the methodology section of your paper, your declaration and your description of how you used GAI in the exam project will not be part of your grade.
Proofreading and feedback
If you’re allowed to use GAI for the exam in question, you must submit a declaration that you have used GAI for proofreading and feedback. This applies even though the text you include in your exam is your own work.
If you’re not allowed to use GAI for the exam in question, you are not allowed to use GAI to proofread and give you feedback on your exam text. This applies even though the text you include in your exam is your own work. For exams where using GAI is not allowed, it doesn’t matter whether the text you include is written by a chatbot or whether you write it yourself: all use of GAI/chatbots is prohibited for this type of exam.
It’s fine to use GAI for feedback and help with text that isn’t included in your exam paper. However, be very careful not to include this kind of text in your exam paper if you’re not allowed to use GAI for the exam: if you do, this will be considered unauthorised use of an exam aid.
In on-site exams where GAI is allowed, you are not required to submit a declaration.
Never upload confidential or sensitive personal data (in other words, data covered by the GDPR rules) to a GAI application: you can’t be sure what will happen to the texts you upload. Make sure you understand the data protection rules, and follow them.
The student guidance permits GenAI unless the academic regulations/course catalogue prohibit it, but students cannot have AI write the examination project for them. Ordinary plagiarism and examination-cheating requirements remain applicable.
The main rule is that you are allowed to use GAI if your academic regulations or the course catalogue doesn’t explicitly state that using GAI is not allowed.
What’s more, the university’s rules about academic cheating and plagiarism also apply to papers and assignments where you use GAI. Check the rules here.To be more specific, under these rules, you’re allowed to use GAI as a dialogue partner. But you’re not allowed to use GAI to do your exam project for you.
If you use part of a text or another output generated by a GAI application in your exam project without changing it, you must cite it in the same way you cite quotations from other secondary sources (Read the rules on citations here).
Cadre général des manquements ; pas de conséquences automatiques de l’IA
Résumé du site · preuve originale ci-dessous
When a report is being considered, assessment and the related oral defence are suspended. Educational Law processes the case on behalf of the Dean; if consultation proceeds the student receives the report and supporting evidence and may give a statement or attend an oral meeting with a companion. The Dean decides following the legal-office recommendation.
Portée enregistrée
Étudiants · program · Bachelor and Master examinations
If you are suspected of exam cheating, a case will be reported to Educational Law, who will process the case on behalf of the dean. You will receive a notification that the case has been reported and that the assessment of your exam is on hold until the case is considered. If you wish to take the re-examination, you must contact studies administration. If your exam ends up being annulled, you may keep the grade from your re-examination.
Please note: Any planned oral defence in connection with the exam in question will be suspended until the case is decided. However, you may participate in all other teaching and exam activities while your case is processed.
The case is processed
When Educational Law receives a report of exam cheating, they assess the case and decide either to dismiss the case or to progress with the case.
If the case is dismissed, you and the person who reported the case will be notified in writing. After this, the assessment of your exam can resume and you may participate in any oral defence in connection with the exam.
If the case is taken further, you will receive a consultation letter describing the circumstances of the case. The purpose of this letter is to inform you of the details of the case and to give you the opportunity to comment on the case before a decision is reached. Along with the letter, you will receive:
a copy of the report
a copy of the exam paper showing the sections where you are suspected of cheating (in cases of text overlap)
a copy of the source texts (in cases of text overlap)
If you would prefer to give your comments orally, you can request a meeting at any point. The person who reported the case and Educational Law may also request a meeting if they consider it necessary for the consideration of the case. Any such meeting will be attended by the case officer from Educational Law and the person who reported the case. You are entitled to bring a companion to the meeting.
Before the meeting, you will receive a letter with a summary of the case along with the materials in the report. After the meeting, you will receive the minutes of the meeting, which you may comment on. Please be aware that holding a meeting can extend the time it takes to process your case.
Please note: When you comment on the case, it is important that you also state whether you are due to take a project/work placement or an exchange programme (or similar) in the coming semester.
How the case is decided
Once Educational Law has processed the report and you have been consulted, the case will be decided. Educational Law will prepare a recommendation for the dean, who will make the final decision regarding the case, after which you and the person who reported the case will be notified.
Cadre général des manquements ; pas de conséquences automatiques de l’IA
Résumé du site · preuve originale ci-dessous
The guide endeavours to complete processing within six to eight weeks of receipt of the report. Students can normally continue other teaching/examinations during processing; this stated processing target is not a guaranteed filing deadline or automatic suspension from all studies.
Portée enregistrée
Étudiants · program · Bachelor and Master examinations
If you are suspected of exam cheating, a case will be reported to Educational Law, who will process the case on behalf of the dean. You will receive a notification that the case has been reported and that the assessment of your exam is on hold until the case is considered. If you wish to take the re-examination, you must contact studies administration. If your exam ends up being annulled, you may keep the grade from your re-examination.
Please note: Any planned oral defence in connection with the exam in question will be suspended until the case is decided. However, you may participate in all other teaching and exam activities while your case is processed.
Cadre général des manquements ; pas de conséquences automatiques de l’IA
Résumé du site · preuve originale ci-dessous
The guide lists warning, examination annulment with an attempt consumed, and temporary or permanent expulsion as possible sanctions depending on the case. HD and engineering admission-course cases follow different ministerial rules, and cannot be resolved with a warning alone.
Portée enregistrée
Étudiants · program · Bachelor and Master examinations
If you cheat or help others to cheat in an exam, it can have serious consequences for you. At AU, cases of exam cheating are processed according to the university’s disciplinary rules – which apply regardless of whether you violated exam rules accidentally or intentionally (see the list of the different types of exam cheating above).
If you are found to have cheated, you will be penalised based on an overall assessment of the gravity of the offence and the type of exam cheating you engaged in. In cases of plagiarism in written exam papers, emphasis is also placed on the amount of text produced by the student compared with the amount of plagiarised text.
Exam cheating can result in the following disciplinary measures:
Issue of a warning
A warning is the least severe disciplinary measure. If you receive a warning, your exam paper will be resubmitted for assessment. If you have taken a re-examination in the meantime, you may keep the highest grade.
Annulment of the exam (counts as an examination attempt)
If your exam is annulled, you will have used an examination attempt but the exam paper in question will not be assessed. If you have already received a grade for this paper, the grade will be discarded. You may take the re-examination under normal conditions after this, providing you have enough examination attempts remaining.
Expulsion for the next semester/more semesters
If you are expelled from the university for a given period, you will not have access to teaching or exam activities at AU from the date of the decision to the end of the expulsion period. In this period, you are therefore unable to take part in any exams or teaching – or any other activities – at AU.
After the exclusion period has ended, you are entitled to resume your academic activities and will be automatically re-registered as an active student.
Permanent expulsion
Permanent expulsion is the most severe disciplinary measure. If you are permanently expelled from the university, you will not be able to participate in any form of teaching, exams or other university activities at any point in the future – neither on the degree programme in question or any other degree programme at AU. The permanent expulsion begins when you are informed about the decision.
You can read more about these disciplinary measures on AU’s disciplinary rules page.
Business administration students (HD) and students on an admission course for an engineering degree programme
If you are a business administration student (HD) or a student on an admission course for an engineering degree programme, your case will be processed and sanctioned according to the rules in the Examination Order on Examinations on Professionally Oriented Higher Education Degree Programmes. Please be aware that this ministerial order does not allow you to only be penalised with a warning.
Cadre général des manquements ; pas de conséquences automatiques de l’IA
Résumé du site · preuve originale ci-dessous
A disciplinary decision by a subordinate manager can be brought before the Rector. Final university decisions under these rules may be appealed to the Danish Agency for Higher Education on legal issues. The acquired disciplinary section supplies no numeric filing deadline; the separate examination-grade appeal period is not substituted.
Other provisions
7.-(1) The consideration of breaches of the disciplinary rules must take place in accordance with the rules of the Danish Public Administration Act.
8.-(1) A decision made by a subordinate manager may be brought before the rector.
(2) The final decisions of the university reached in accordance with these rules may be appealed to the Danish Agency for Higher Education by the party whom the decision concerns (the complainant) if the appeal concerns legal issues.
Entry into force
9.-(1) These regulations come into force on 1 September 2018.
(2) Rules on disciplinary measures for students at Aarhus University of 1 April 2016 are hereby repealed.
Cadre général des manquements ; pas de conséquences automatiques de l’IA
Résumé du site · preuve originale ci-dessous
Reported students may seek case clarification from Educational Law and procedural support from their faculty student counsellors; a companion may attend the oral consultation meeting.
Portée enregistrée
Étudiants · program · Bachelor and Master examinations
From the time the case is reported until it is decided, the person who made the report (the examiner) may not comment on matters of case processing and/or possible disciplinary measures. If you have questions about the processing of your case or the severity of possible penalties, please contact Educational Law ([email protected]), who process cases of suspected exam cheating (Read more about Educational Law).
The person who reported the case may only comment on the reason you were reported but has no obligation to do so and may therefore choose not to comment. You will, however, receive a copy of the report, which will outline why you have been reported for suspected exam cheating.
If you need help to get an overview of the process if you are reported and how the case may affect your study programme, you are welcome to contact the student counsellors in your faculty.
Mises à jour de nos données vérifiées ; elles ne confirment pas un changement de politique de l’université.
Les mises à jour ne sont pas encore disponibles pour cette page.
Fiche examinée
Énoncés examinés
10 énoncés examinés
Intégrité académique 2 énoncés examinés
Intégrité académique
Aarhus University student guidance says students who use GAI in an exam project must submit a declaration naming the applications and explaining how they were used, and unchanged GAI output used in an exam project must be cited like other secondary-source quotations.
If you use part of a text or another output generated by a GAI application in your exam project without changing it, you must cite it in the same way you cite quotations from other secondary sources. If you use GAI in your exam project, you must submit a declaration that contains the following: 1) confirmation you used GAI, 2) the name of the GAI applications you used (ChatGPT, Copilot, Bing etc. and 3) an explanation of how you used the applications in your paper.
Affichage localisé only
Students must cite unchanged GAI output used in an exam project and submit a declaration confirming GAI use, naming the applications, and explaining their use.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
74d5fe6b…
Récupéré
14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Rules for using GAI, citation and declaration bullets
Intégrité académique
Aarhus University student guidance says that when GAI is not allowed for an exam, students are not allowed to use GAI for proofreading or feedback on the exam text, and for internet-allowed exams where GAI is not allowed students may do regular web searches but may not actively use AI functions.
If you’re not allowed to use GAI for the exam in question, you are not allowed to use GAI to proofread and give you feedback on your exam text. Exams where the internet is allowed, but AI is not allowed, you are allowed to do regular web searches, but you are not allowed to actively use AI functions.
Affichage localisé only
When GAI is disallowed for an exam, AU bars GAI proofreading/feedback on exam text and active use of AI functions even if regular internet search is allowed.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
74d5fe6b…
Récupéré
14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Rules for using GAI, Proofreading and feedback; Exams where the internet is allowed but GAI is not allowed
Enseignement 1 énoncés examinés
Enseignement
AU Educate guidance for teaching staff says that from fall 2024 students are allowed to use GAI in all AU exams unless academic regulations or the course description explicitly state that they may not, and it advises teachers to read those rules for their courses.
From the fall of 2024, students are allowed to use generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in all exams at AU unless it is explicitly stated in the academic regulations or course description that they may not. The new rules have been implemented in the individual academic regulations and course descriptions, therefore it might be beneficial to read these and understand how it applies to your course(s).
Affichage localisé only
AU Educate tells teaching staff that GAI is allowed in all AU exams from fall 2024 unless programme or course rules explicitly disallow it.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
37608a7a…
Récupéré
14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
GAI and exams section
Confidentialité 4 énoncés examinés
Confidentialité
Aarhus University student guidance says students should never upload confidential or sensitive personal data covered by GDPR rules to a GAI application.
Never upload confidential or sensitive personal data (in other words, data covered by the GDPR rules) to a GAI application: you can’t be sure what will happen to the texts you upload. Make sure you understand the data protection rules, and follow them.
Affichage localisé only
AU student guidance tells students never to upload confidential or sensitive personal data covered by GDPR to GAI applications.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
74d5fe6b…
Récupéré
14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Rules for using GAI, GDPR bullet
Confidentialité
Aarhus University staff guidance says staff may not use GAI for trade secrets, confidential or sensitive data or copyrighted material; staff are responsible for the accuracy and quality of GAI-generated content they use or share; and GAI use should be credited where relevant.
This means that you may not use GAI for anything involving trade secrets, confidential or sensitive data or copyrighted material. When you use GAI to generate a text or an image, you are responsible for ensuring the accuracy and quality of the content. Generally speaking, you should always consider whether crediting your use of GAI is relevant when you use GAI to generate a text, an image, a video or another product.
Affichage localisé only
AU staff guidance bars GAI use with trade secrets, confidential/sensitive data, or copyrighted material, and requires users to verify quality and consider crediting GAI use.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
3dcea669…
Récupéré
14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Principles 1, 2, and 3
Confidentialité
AU Library guidance for students says many library-provided materials such as e-books and articles may not be shared with AI tools, students should never upload confidential information to AI, and AI text mining of a larger text corpus is only permitted in an academic context if the library agreement with the publisher allows it.
For many of the materials that the library provides access to, such as electronic books and articles, you are not permitted to share them with AI tools. It is only permitted to use AI for text mining of a larger text corpus in an academic context, if the library's agreement with the publisher allows it. You should never upload confidential information to an AI technology.
Affichage localisé only
AU Library warns that many e-resources may not be shared with AI tools, text mining depends on publisher agreements, and confidential information should never be uploaded to AI.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
bf2f5c93…
Récupéré
14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Uploading copyright-protected material to AI; AI and confidential information
Confidentialité
AU Library guidance says students using AI to transcribe interviews should consider legality and good academic practice, including responsibility for personal and confidential data, informant consent, GDPR compliance, secure storage and deletion when data is no longer needed.
As a student, you are responsible for your use of AI in your work. If you want to use an AI tool to transcribe your interviews, you should carefully consider the entire process in relation to legality and good academic practice. Always be aware of: As a student, you are responsible for data when processing personal data and confidential information. Have your informants given consent to the processing? Consider which AI technology you are using and whether it complies with GDPR legislation.
Affichage localisé only
AU Library tells students to treat AI interview transcription as a data-protection and consent workflow, not just a technical tool choice.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
bf2f5c93…
Récupéré
14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
AI for transcribing your interviews
Règles d’utilisation des outils d’IA 2 énoncés examinés
Règles d’utilisation des outils d’IA
Microsoft Copilot Basic is listed for Aarhus University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.
Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance97%
Valeur normalisée: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot Basic","description":"Aarhus University basic Microsoft Copilot access.","howToObtain":"Use the basic version available to AU students and employees.","costToUser":"Equivalent to the free ChatGPT version.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"not_specified"}
Vérifié pour la dernière fois
16 juil. 2026
Dernière modification
16 juil. 2026
Preuve originale
Preuve 1
Aarhus University IT says all students and employees have access to the basic version of Microsoft Copilot, equivalent to the free version of ChatGPT.
Affichage localisé only
Aarhus University IT says all students and employees have access to the basic version of Microsoft Copilot, equivalent to the free version of ChatGPT.
Langue de la source
da
Empreinte de l’instantané
a84b331c…
Récupéré
16 juil. 2026
Règles d’utilisation des outils d’IA
Aarhus University student guidance says the main rule is that students are allowed to use GAI unless their academic regulations or the course catalogue explicitly state that GAI is not allowed.
The main rule is that you are allowed to use GAI if your academic regulations or the course catalogue doesn’t explicitly state that using GAI is not allowed.
Affichage localisé only
AU student guidance states that GAI is allowed by default unless academic regulations or the course catalogue explicitly disallow it.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
74d5fe6b…
Récupéré
14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Rules for using GAI, main rule
Achats 1 énoncés examinés
Achats
Aarhus University staff guidance says all students and staff have access to a Microsoft Copilot version similar to free ChatGPT, that no university-wide guidelines for which GAI applications are allowed have been adopted, and that purchases of systems and licences must be handled with the unit, AU IT and AU Finance.
In addition to access to all free GAI applications, all students and staff have access to the version of the Microsoft Copilot which is similar to the free version of ChatGPT. No university-wide guidelines for which GAI applications staff and students are allowed to use have been adopted. However, any purchases of systems and licenses must be carried out in collaboration between the individual unit and AU IT and AU Finance.
Affichage localisé only
AU staff guidance notes Copilot access for students and staff, no adopted university-wide list of allowed GAI applications, and central handling of purchases with AU IT and AU Finance.
Langue de la source
English (en)
Empreinte de l’instantané
3dcea669…
Récupéré
14 mai 2026
Localisateur de preuve
Principle 7, GAI purchases must be handled centrally
Fiche des sources
Sources officielles
5 sources
5 official URLs; 5 source attributions and their captured versions retained.
AI and copyright
library.au.dk
Source officielle de l’université
library.au.dk
Hash and captured version
AI and copyright · 2026-05-14T13:56:55.000Z
Representation unspecified in this historical record; do not assume an original-file hash.
Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Aarhus University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/aarhus-university
La langue d’origine de la source universitaire fait foi. Ce suivi n’est pas une déclaration officielle de l’université.
Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.
Questions fréquentes
Questions fréquentes
Puis-je utiliser l’IA pour mes travaux ?
Aarhus University has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
