public-release-20260526-003
Comparé à public-release-20260526-001.
différentiel Université of New England Australia public-release-20260526-003
Comparaison de public-release-20260526-001 avec public-release-20260526-003.
Journal des modifications
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.
University of New England Australia currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 24 mai 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 6 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour University of New England Australia. Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.
Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.
Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.
Comparaison de public-release-20260526-001 avec public-release-20260526-003.
1 diff de publication publique
Comparé à public-release-20260526-001.
Comparaison de public-release-20260526-001 avec public-release-20260526-003.
6 Affirmation enregistrements
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance says higher degree research candidates are required to consider ethical, critical, and creative uses of generative AI and to ensure proper citation of content generated by AI tools and sources they use.
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance warns that failure to reference generative AI content may be considered academic or research misconduct, and lists risks including unacknowledged AI output, inaccurate AI-generated references, substantive AI-generated thesis or publication content, peer review or ethics-clearance use, and disclosure of sensitive or confidential material to generative AI.
UNE's Student Academic Integrity Policy includes artificial intelligence tools in its example of work substantially written by someone else, within the policy's breach framework for undergraduate and postgraduate award and non-award coursework students; the policy states it does not apply to higher degree by research courses.
UNE's HDR generative AI guidance cautions that inputting research data into AI can risk loss of copyright or intellectual property control and can have serious implications if sensitive or highly sensitive data is inadvertently released.
A UNE School of Education public myLearn information page tells students that computer programs, artificial intelligence tools, or other tools should not be used to write or produce any part of an assessment response unless explicitly referenced and in line with unit coordinator advice for the assessment task.
UNE's public Learning Online academic integrity myLearn section states that a Generative AI and Academic Integrity at UNE module exists and lists module topics including general principles for use of generative AI, Turnitin detection and AI, and referencing generative AI.
4 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 24 mai 2026, 14:27
official_guidance Tracker checked at 24 mai 2026, 14:27
official_guidance Tracker checked at 24 mai 2026, 14:27
official_policy_page Tracker checked at 24 mai 2026, 14:27