Historique du registre

The University of Melbourne

Mises à jour de nos données vérifiées ; elles ne confirment pas un changement de politique de l’université.

La date de publication du registre n’est pas la date d’entrée en vigueur de la politique.

Révisions correspondantes : 4

  1. Mise à jour de page

    Mise à jour de page

    Révision: v6-reading-rankings-ten-20261027
    Voir la révision
    Autres éléments · Mise à jour de page

    Mise à jour de page

    Textes ancien et nouveau non comparables.

    Nouveau texte

    Shared V6 reading layout and evidence presentation updated. University policy Claims, original evidence, held decisions and snapshot approvals remain unchanged; the institution audit remains PARTIAL.

    Ouvrir l’historique de la révision
  2. Correction du site · Ajout au registre

    Éléments concernés : 35 (21 corrigés / ajustés · 14 ajoutés)

    Révision: melbourne-v6-r3-20261018
    Voir la révision

    Comprendre cette mise à jour

    Aperçu structuré du registre

    Éléments concernés : 35 (21 corrigés / ajustés · 14 ajoutés)

    Outils autorisés · Travaux de cours · 8 autres thèmes

    Aucun résumé vérifié indépendamment n’est encore disponible pour cette révision.

    Ce résumé historique ne confirme ni une autorisation actuelle ni une nouvelle règle de l’université.

    Travaux de cours · Éléments concernés : 3 (3 corrigés / ajustés)

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    Students must check with their Subject Coordinator before using GenAI for assessment-related work at the University of Melbourne.

    Nouveau texte

    Before using GenAI for assessment-related work, University of Melbourne students must check that their Subject Coordinator has authorised its use.

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    University of Melbourne students must produce the text, code, designs, or images they are being assessed on themselves, not via GenAI, in order to develop the skills and capabilities their degree claims they have.

    Nouveau texte

    At the University of Melbourne, students are expected to produce their own perspective, experience, and knowledge in assessable work rather than rely on AI output alone.

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    Each University of Melbourne subject coordinator is responsible for setting out the bounds of appropriate GenAI use within their subject, and is strongly encouraged to consider possible use case scenarios, set clear boundaries, and have conversations with students.

    Nouveau texte

    Each University of Melbourne subject coordinator is responsible for setting out the bounds of appropriate GenAI use within their subject and having conversations with students for clarity.

    Examens · Éléments concernés : 1 (1 ajoutés)

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    In University of Melbourne examinations, students must verify whether GenAI use is authorised for the specific exam, and if permitted, ensure that only approved tools and specified uses are employed in alignment with University policy.

    Déclaration d’utilisation · Éléments concernés : 3 (2 corrigés / ajustés · 1 ajoutés)

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    University of Melbourne students must appropriately cite any use of GenAI tools in the preparation of assessment submissions.

    Nouveau texte

    If students use an AI tool such as ChatGPT to generate output that is paraphrased or directly quoted in assessable writing, it must be cited and referenced as a source in the reference list.

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    At the University of Melbourne, using GenAI tools to produce work submitted for assessment without acknowledgement constitutes academic misconduct under cl. 4.13 of the Student Academic Integrity Policy (MPF1310).

    Nouveau texte

    At the University of Melbourne, using GenAI tools on an assessment task that does not permit them, or using them in preparation without acknowledgement, constitutes academic misconduct under cl. 4.13 of the Student Academic Integrity Policy (MPF1310).

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    University of Melbourne guidance mandates that citing AI outputs in the reference list does not replace an acknowledgement declaration: students who cite or paraphrase AI outputs must still provide a declaration detailing how AI tools were used across the assessment process.

    Sécurité des données · Éléments concernés : 6 (5 corrigés / ajustés · 1 ajoutés)

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    University of Melbourne assessment materials and teaching materials constitute University IP and should never be tested on third-party external GenAI platforms such as ChatGPT; any such testing must be done only within the University's secure SparkAI platform.

    Nouveau texte

    Because third-party external platforms such as ChatGPT use prompts and inputs to further train their models, University of Melbourne staff must not enter assessments, teaching materials, or sensitive IP into third-party platforms, reserving such testing for SparkAI or sanctioned platforms.

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    The University of Melbourne advises researchers that they should not share confidential information or information about an innovation in a generative AI prompt, as that may mean the IP is no longer owned by the researcher or by the University.

    Nouveau texte

    Researchers are advised not to share confidential information or innovation details in generative AI prompts, as that may cause IP to no longer be owned by the researcher or University.

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    University of Melbourne students must not upload personal information (full name, date of birth, address, or other confidential/sensitive/private information) to GenAI tools.

    Nouveau texte

    University of Melbourne students must protect personal information and not upload full names, dates of birth, addresses, or other confidential, sensitive or private information to GenAI tools.

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    University of Melbourne students must not upload copyrighted material (such as lecture slides or subject material) to AI tools without permission, as this may violate the intellectual property rights of creators.

    Nouveau texte

    When uploading material to an AI tool, University of Melbourne students must ensure they do not violate creator copyright without permission.

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    The University of Melbourne states that University IP cannot be uploaded to external sites and recommends using the University's SparkAI platform when staff want AI to review University materials.

    Nouveau texte

    Assessments and teaching materials constitute University IP and must never be tested on third-party external platforms like ChatGPT; testing or auditing must be done only within SparkAI or sanctioned platforms.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    Student interactions with LMS-embedded tools such as AILA are governed by the University LMS privacy collection notice: interaction metadata, assessment content, and system records are retained in the LMS and may be reviewed to verify authorship or investigate suspected policy breaches, accessible to authorized decision-makers.

    Outils autorisés · Éléments concernés : 4 (3 corrigés / ajustés · 1 ajoutés)

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    AILA is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Nouveau texte

    AILA is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self_hosted_system.

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    SparkAI is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Nouveau texte

    SparkAI is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self_hosted_system.

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    Turnitin AI writing detection is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Nouveau texte

    Turnitin AI writing detection is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally_licensed_or_procured.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    University of Melbourne students have access to M365 Copilot Chat with their student account, supporting study with private OneDrive data protection; assessment use must follow subject rules and be properly acknowledged.

    Recherche et publication · Éléments concernés : 4 (2 corrigés / ajustés · 2 ajoutés)

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    The University of Melbourne has published a Statement on Graduate Research and digital assistance tools governing the use of AI tools by Graduate Researchers.

    Nouveau texte

    Specific guidance for University of Melbourne researchers regarding acknowledging digital assistance tools in research outputs is available via the Research Ethics and Integrity website.

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    At the University of Melbourne, generative AI tools can only be used in research outputs where the material generated or substantially altered by these tools is acknowledged according to the University's policy and the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research.

    Nouveau texte

    Generative AI tools can only be used in research outputs if material generated or substantially altered is acknowledged according to University policy and the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    For graduate researchers and research theses, digital assistance and GenAI use is strictly limited to minor editorial support (language, clarity, spelling, grammar) under the Australian Standards for Editing Practice; substantial redrafting is prohibited and supervisor AI review requires explicit written permission.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    Under section 5.11 of the Responsible Conduct of Research Policy (MPF1318) and University guidance, research personnel must document digital assistance tool use, disclose DAT use to collaborators and in outputs (including theses), and obtain all required privacy, security, and ethics approvals.

    Intégrité académique · Éléments concernés : 5 (1 corrigés / ajustés · 4 ajoutés)

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    A high AI score in Turnitin's writing detection report at the University of Melbourne is not proof that academic misconduct has taken place and does not on its own constitute grounds for making an allegation of academic misconduct.

    Nouveau texte

    A high AI score in Turnitin's writing detection report is not proof of misconduct and does not on its own constitute grounds for making an allegation of academic misconduct.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    Under University of Melbourne student appeals procedures, appeals against academic misconduct decisions must be submitted via the online form within 20 University business days from the original decision date.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    Poor academic practice refers to minor and unintentional departures managed educatively by Subject Coordinators, and is explicitly distinct from academic misconduct.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    The University of Melbourne academic misconduct framework explicitly categorizes unauthorized or undisclosed use of technology (including GenAI) as a breach type under academic integrity procedures.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    Turnitin AI detection results serve only as a prompt for further investigation; if suspected, students may be invited to explain their work and provide drafts or notes in an exploratory discussion.

    Conseils pédagogiques · Éléments concernés : 6 (3 corrigés / ajustés · 3 ajoutés)

    Correction du site

    Textes ancien et nouveau non comparables.

    Ancien texte

    University of Melbourne staff should consider and provide advice on the limits of acceptable use of AI-powered translation and editing tools (e.g. Grammarly, Google Translate) in their subjects, as student use can extend to the point where students are no longer expressing their own ideas.

    Nouveau texte

    University of Melbourne staff should consider and provide advice on the limits of acceptable use of AI-powered translation and editing tools (e.g. Grammarly, Google Translate) in their subjects, as student use can extend to the point where students are no longer expressing their own ideas.

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    The University of Melbourne advises staff to model the transparency requested from students by acknowledging the use of any GenAI tools in materials provided to students.

    Nouveau texte

    University of Melbourne staff may use GenAI tools to help prepare teaching materials provided care is exercised for proper use of University IP and ethical AI use.

    Correction du site

    Textes ancien et nouveau non comparables.

    Ancien texte

    At the University of Melbourne, use of GenAI tools for marking or grading should never be a substitute for staff exercising their own evaluative judgement.

    Nouveau texte

    At the University of Melbourne, use of GenAI tools for marking or grading should never be a substitute for staff exercising their own evaluative judgement.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    The Melbourne CSHE provides a range of pedagogical strategies for using GenAI tools to enhance assessment tasks.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    Under University guidelines on assuring learning in the age of GenAI, in most cases subjects are designed so that secure assessment types account for at least 50% of total marks, with phased implementation (2026–2028) and programmatic exceptions.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    Assuring student learning requires careful use of secure assessment types at key points where student authorship can be verified, contrasted with open assessments where rules may be circumvented.

    Sécurité et acquisition · Éléments concernés : 2 (1 corrigés / ajustés · 1 ajoutés)

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    The University of Melbourne has adopted AI Principles designed to guide actions around the adoption and use of AI tools and systems across the institution.

    Nouveau texte

    The Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning (BEL+T) provides discipline-specific guidance offering educators key concepts and definitions for generative AI in built environments.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    The University of Melbourne AI Principles commit to building awareness among students and staff of their responsibilities around AI tools in work preparation and managing integrity-related risks.

    Enseignement · Éléments concernés : 1 (1 corrigés / ajustés)

    Correction du site

    Texte des conclusions du site
    Ancien texte

    The University of Melbourne recommends that universities should have autonomy over their own generative AI policies and that the Australian Government develop optional guidance for the sector on the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, assessment, and research.

    Nouveau texte

    In its 2023 submission, the University encouraged optional government sector guidance and communities of practice to share best practice in GenAI education.

    Ouvrir l’historique de la révision
  3. Ajout au registre · Historique · motif non classé

    Éléments concernés : 6 (3 ajoutés)

    Révision: public-release-20260715-005
    Voir la révision

    Comprendre cette mise à jour

    Aperçu structuré du registre

    Éléments concernés : 6 (3 ajoutés)

    Règles d’utilisation des outils d’IA

    Aucun résumé vérifié indépendamment n’est encore disponible pour cette révision.

    Ce résumé historique ne confirme ni une autorisation actuelle ni une nouvelle règle de l’université.

    Règles d’utilisation des outils d’IA · Éléments concernés : 6 (3 ajoutés)

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    AILA is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    SparkAI is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Historique · motif non classé

    Textes ancien et nouveau non comparables.

    Ancien texte

    Copilot (Web) is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    Historique · motif non classé

    Textes ancien et nouveau non comparables.

    Ancien texte

    SparkAI is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    Turnitin AI writing detection is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

    Historique · motif non classé

    Textes ancien et nouveau non comparables.

    Ancien texte

    Zoom AI Companion is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    Ouvrir l’historique de la révision
  4. Ajout au registre

    Éléments concernés : 3 (3 ajoutés)

    Révision: public-release-20260614-001
    Voir la révision

    Comprendre cette mise à jour

    Aperçu structuré du registre

    Éléments concernés : 3 (3 ajoutés)

    Règles d’utilisation des outils d’IA

    Aucun résumé vérifié indépendamment n’est encore disponible pour cette révision.

    Ce résumé historique ne confirme ni une autorisation actuelle ni une nouvelle règle de l’université.

    Règles d’utilisation des outils d’IA · Éléments concernés : 3 (3 ajoutés)

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    Copilot (Web) is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    SparkAI is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

    Ajout au registre

    Ajout

    Zoom AI Companion is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

    Ouvrir l’historique de la révision