other
At the University of Melbourne, using GenAI tools to produce work submitted for assessment without acknowledgement constitutes academic misconduct under cl. 4.13 of the Student Academic Integrity Policy (MPF1310).
Révision: Révisé par un agent
Journal des modifications
The University of Melbourne
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Résumé des modifications
Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.
The University of Melbourne currently has 18 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 6 mai 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour The University of Melbourne. Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.
Aucune ligne de différence de politique entre les versions n'est encore enregistrée pour cette université. La page suit toujours les affirmations actuelles étayées par des sources, les attributions de sources officielles, l'état d'examen, la fraîcheur des sources et les JSON publics pour la découverte et la citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.
Catégories de différences
Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.
Différentiel de version combinée
Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.
différentiel The University of Melbourne combined release
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+20-0
11 # The University of Melbourne AI policy record
2+other: At the University of Melbourne, using GenAI tools to produce work submitted for assessment without acknowledgement constitutes academic misconduct under cl. 4.13 of the Student Academic Integrity Policy (MPF1310).
3+Evidence (en, 38a9f306c6e6): If an assessment task does not permit the use of such tools, or if they use such tools in the preparation of an assessment submission without acknowledgement, this constitutes academic misconduct under cl. 4.13 of the Student Academic Integrity Policy (MPF1310).
4+other: A high AI score in Turnitin's writing detection report at the University of Melbourne is not proof that academic misconduct has taken place and does not on its own constitute grounds for making an allegation of academic misconduct.
5+Evidence (en, 38a9f306c6e6): A high AI score in Turnitin's writing detection report is not proof that academic misconduct has taken place (any more than would be the case when using the more familiar similarity report tool to flag potential plagiarism). It does not, on its own, constitute grounds for making an allegation of academic misconduct.
6+other: Students must check with their Subject Coordinator before using GenAI for assessment-related work at the University of Melbourne.
7+Evidence (en, abcf41948894): Before you use GenAI for assessment-related work you must check to ensure that your Subject Coordinator has authorised its use.
8+other: University of Melbourne assessment materials and teaching materials constitute University IP and should never be tested on third-party external GenAI platforms such as ChatGPT; any such testing must be done only within the University's secure SparkAI platform.
9+Evidence (en, 38a9f306c6e6): Since assessments and other teaching materials constitute University IP, they should never be tested on third-party external platforms such as ChatGPT, since these platforms use all prompts and inputs to further train their models. Any such testing/auditing must be done only within the University's secure GenAI platform (SparkAI) or other University of Melbourne-sanctioned platforms.
10+other: University of Melbourne students must appropriately cite any use of GenAI tools in the preparation of assessment submissions.
11+Evidence (en, 38a9f306c6e6): Any use of GenAI in the preparation of an assessment submission must be appropriately cited.
12+other: At the University of Melbourne, generative AI tools can only be used in research outputs where the material generated or substantially altered by these tools is acknowledged according to the University's policy and the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research.
13+Evidence (en, 54286d0127fc): Generative AI tools can only be used if material that is generated or substantially altered by these tools is acknowledged according to the University's policy and the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research.
14+other: The University of Melbourne advises researchers that they should not share confidential information or information about an innovation in a generative AI prompt, as that may mean the IP is no longer owned by the researcher or by the University.
15+Evidence (en, 54286d0127fc): The University has advised researchers that they should not share confidential information or information about an innovation in a generative AI prompt, as that may mean that the IP is no longer owned by the researcher or by the University.
16+other: University of Melbourne students must not upload personal information (full name, date of birth, address, or other confidential/sensitive/private information) to GenAI tools.
17+Evidence (en, abcf41948894): Protect your personal information and that of others. Do not upload your full name, date of birth, address or other confidential, sensitive or private information.
18+other: University of Melbourne students must not upload copyrighted material (such as lecture slides or subject material) to AI tools without permission, as this may violate the intellectual property rights of creators.
19+Evidence (en, abcf41948894): Don't make copyright material available on the web or to an AI tool without permission.
20+other: Each University of Melbourne subject coordinator is responsible for setting out the bounds of appropriate GenAI use within their subject, and is strongly encouraged to consider possible use case scenarios, set clear boundaries, and have conversations with students.
21+Evidence (en, 38a9f306c6e6): It is the responsibility of each subject coordinator to set out the bounds of appropriate GenAI use within their subject. Coordinators are strongly encouraged to consider possible use case scenarios for their assessments, set clear boundaries, and have conversations with their students to enable clarity about what tools are appropriate and for what tasks.
Historique des versions
0 public release diffs
Modifications d'affirmations
18 Affirmation enregistrements
other
A high AI score in Turnitin's writing detection report at the University of Melbourne is not proof that academic misconduct has taken place and does not on its own constitute grounds for making an allegation of academic misconduct.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
Students must check with their Subject Coordinator before using GenAI for assessment-related work at the University of Melbourne.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
University of Melbourne assessment materials and teaching materials constitute University IP and should never be tested on third-party external GenAI platforms such as ChatGPT; any such testing must be done only within the University's secure SparkAI platform.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
University of Melbourne students must appropriately cite any use of GenAI tools in the preparation of assessment submissions.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
At the University of Melbourne, generative AI tools can only be used in research outputs where the material generated or substantially altered by these tools is acknowledged according to the University's policy and the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
The University of Melbourne advises researchers that they should not share confidential information or information about an innovation in a generative AI prompt, as that may mean the IP is no longer owned by the researcher or by the University.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
University of Melbourne students must not upload personal information (full name, date of birth, address, or other confidential/sensitive/private information) to GenAI tools.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
University of Melbourne students must not upload copyrighted material (such as lecture slides or subject material) to AI tools without permission, as this may violate the intellectual property rights of creators.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
Each University of Melbourne subject coordinator is responsible for setting out the bounds of appropriate GenAI use within their subject, and is strongly encouraged to consider possible use case scenarios, set clear boundaries, and have conversations with students.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
The University of Melbourne states that University IP cannot be uploaded to external sites and recommends using the University's SparkAI platform when staff want AI to review University materials.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
At the University of Melbourne, use of GenAI tools for marking or grading should never be a substitute for staff exercising their own evaluative judgement.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
The University of Melbourne advises staff to model the transparency requested from students by acknowledging the use of any GenAI tools in materials provided to students.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
University of Melbourne staff should consider and provide advice on the limits of acceptable use of AI-powered translation and editing tools (e.g. Grammarly, Google Translate) in their subjects, as student use can extend to the point where students are no longer expressing their own ideas.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
The University of Melbourne recommends that universities should have autonomy over their own generative AI policies and that the Australian Government develop optional guidance for the sector on the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, assessment, and research.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
The University of Melbourne has adopted AI Principles designed to guide actions around the adoption and use of AI tools and systems across the institution.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
University of Melbourne students must produce the text, code, designs, or images they are being assessed on themselves, not via GenAI, in order to develop the skills and capabilities their degree claims they have.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
other
The University of Melbourne has published a Statement on Graduate Research and digital assistance tools governing the use of AI tools by Graduate Researchers.
Révision: Révisé par un agent
Instantanés source
5 source attributions
GenAI at Melbourne
official_guidance Tracker checked at 6 mai 2026, 04:55
Generative AI in T&L at the University of Melbourne
official_guidance Tracker checked at 6 mai 2026, 04:55
Official statements from The University of Melbourne
official_guidance Tracker checked at 6 mai 2026, 04:55
UoM Submission: Inquiry into Generative AI in Education
official_pdf Tracker checked at 6 mai 2026, 04:55
What Is This Guide? - Melbourne School of Design
official_guidance Tracker checked at 6 mai 2026, 04:55