University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Langue
ENZHFRPL

Journal des modifications

Universidade de São Paulo

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Révision: Révisé par un agentVérifié pour la dernière fois14 mai 2026Dernière modification14 mai 2026Affirmations4Sources4Enregistrements de version0
Page universitaireJSON publicRapport mensuelIndex des universités

Résumé des modifications

Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.

Universidade de São Paulo currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 14 mai 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour Universidade de São Paulo. Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.

Aucune ligne de différence de politique entre les versions n'est encore enregistrée pour cette université. La page suit toujours les affirmations actuelles étayées par des sources, les attributions de sources officielles, l'état d'examen, la fraîcheur des sources et les JSON publics pour la découverte et la citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.

Catégories de différences

Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.

Texte de la politique0Récemment extraits0Preuve0Instantanés source0Texte source0Source ajoutée0Source supprimée0

Différentiel de version combinée

Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.

différentiel Universidade de São Paulo combined release

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+8-0
11 # Universidade de São Paulo AI policy record
2+teaching: A FDUSP generative AI governance report recommends mitigation measures including training and disclosure, review of generated content, transparency about use, and avoiding prompts containing personal data.
3+Evidence (pt-BR, c57e715622df): A forma de mitigar tais riscos está na adoção de medidas de governança, por meio de (i) treinamento e divulgação para esclarecimento quanto aos usos adequados e inadequados da ferramenta; (ii) revisão do conteúdo gerado, de forma a garantir sua acurácia e mitigar a presença de vieses discriminatórios; (iii) transparência em seu uso; e (iv) evitar requisições que contenham dados pessoais
4+academic_integrity: The FDUSP report says lack of transparency about student use of generative AI in faculty academic work points to a need for faculty actions promoting awareness and rules or guidelines for transparent and ethical use.
5+Evidence (pt-BR, c57e715622df): Essa falta de transparência é preocupante, por dificultar processos internos de revisão e correção dos trabalhos e atividades acadêmicas. Esse fato, aliado a dúvidas quanto à legitimidade e à legalidade do uso, apontam para a necessidade de ações pela faculdade para promover a conscientização e a criação de regras e diretrizes que promovam a transparência e o uso ético das IAGs.
6+source_status: An IEA-USP report says a USP seminar initiated debates for proposals to be sent to the USP Rector's Office so it could define guidelines and norms for appropriate and ethical use of tools such as ChatGPT in teaching and research.
7+Evidence (pt-BR, fde9ec3256b2): O seminário deu início a uma série de debates para a elaboração de propostas a serem encaminhadas à Reitoria da USP, para que esta defina um conjunto de diretrizes e normas que asseguram o uso adequado e ético de ferramentas como ChatGPT no ensino e na pesquisa.
8+ai_tool_treatment: An ABCD-USP article says USP's direction includes ethics and integrity formation, writing development, and broader use of plagiarism/similarity platforms such as Turnitin and Crossref Similarity Check iThenticate, which the article says USP has subscribed to since 2016 through ABCD-USP.
9+Evidence (pt-BR, 0d1321dfe156): O caminho na Universidade de São Paulo já tem uma direção e ela passa pela formação dos estudantes com ênfase na ética e na integridade, investimento no aprimoramento da escrita e redação científica e acadêmica, ampliação do uso de plataformas de prevenção de plágio como o Turnitin por docentes em conjunto com as bibliotecas... Ambas as ferramentas são assinadas pela USP desde 2016 por meio da Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais (ABCD-USP).

Historique des versions

0 public release diffs

Modifications d'affirmations

4 Affirmation enregistrements

source_status

An IEA-USP report says a USP seminar initiated debates for proposals to be sent to the USP Rector's Office so it could define guidelines and norms for appropriate and ethical use of tools such as ChatGPT in teaching and research.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance80%Preuve1Languespt-BR

ai_tool_treatment

An ABCD-USP article says USP's direction includes ethics and integrity formation, writing development, and broader use of plagiarism/similarity platforms such as Turnitin and Crossref Similarity Check iThenticate, which the article says USP has subscribed to since 2016 through ABCD-USP.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance78%Preuve1Languespt-BR

academic_integrity

The FDUSP report says lack of transparency about student use of generative AI in faculty academic work points to a need for faculty actions promoting awareness and rules or guidelines for transparent and ethical use.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance84%Preuve1Languespt-BR

teaching

A FDUSP generative AI governance report recommends mitigation measures including training and disclosure, review of generated content, transparency about use, and avoiding prompts containing personal data.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance86%Preuve1Languespt-BR

Instantanés source

4 source attributions