privacy
UNAM's 2025 education recommendations advise faculty using generative AI in teaching to avoid entering personal or sensitive information into AI platforms and to orient students and colleagues about data privacy.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
7 claim records
academic_integrity
For assessment, UNAM's 2025 recommendations advise faculty to define the level of generative-AI incorporation and, when AI use is allowed, ask students to provide the prompts/instructions and generated responses for review.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
UNAM's 2025 recommendations advise designing strategies for undeclared generative-AI use and caution against indiscriminate use of AI detectors because their effectiveness is questioned and they raise privacy concerns.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
UNAM's 2023 teaching recommendations suggest that faculty clearly specify acceptable and unacceptable ChatGPT use, require recognition and documentation of AI-tool use, and emphasize user responsibility for submitted academic products.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
UNAM's 2025 GAIA-GEN document frames its generative-AI education content as recommendations for informed, ethical, and critical use, not as a rigid prescriptive framework.
Review: Agent reviewed
research
The 2025 UNAM DGTIC ethics diagnostic frames transparency in AI-mediated research as clearly stating whether AI tools were used in questions, hypotheses, experimental design, calculations, data analysis, or research-report writing.
Review: Agent reviewed
source_status
A 2025 UNAM DGTIC ethics diagnostic says UNAM did not yet have an institutional framework for ethical integration of AI systems, while recommending stronger normative work and ethics-committee capacity for AI cases.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
3 source attributions
Recomendaciones para el uso de la inteligencia artificial generativa en la docencia
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 1:55 PM
Recomendaciones para el uso educativo de la Inteligencia Artificial Generativa en la UNAM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 1:55 PM
Uso y desarrollo ético de la Inteligencia Artificial en la Universidad: docencia e investigación
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 1:55 PM