academic_integrity
SFU guidance says AI detectors cannot be used for grading decisions or academic misconduct investigations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Simon Fraser University
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Simon Fraser University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Simon Fraser University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Simon Fraser University combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+10-0
11 # Simon Fraser University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: SFU guidance says AI detectors cannot be used for grading decisions or academic misconduct investigations.
3+Evidence (en, 239c0af4dddf): Do not rely on AI detectors, as these tools can be unreliable, biased and may unintentionally comprise your learning and well-being. AI detectors cannot be used for grading decisions or academic misconduct investigations.
4+academic_integrity: SFU tells students that use of generative AI for coursework depends on instructor permission, and students should not assume it is permitted when guidance is unclear or absent.
5+Evidence (en, 1bc5d31c1fac): The only way to know if you are permitted to use generative AI for your course assignments is by checking with your course instructor, who will likely communicate this in the course syllabus. If you are unsure, you must not assume that using generative AI is permitted.
6+privacy: SFU guidance for faculty and staff says personal or confidential information should not be entered into AI tools that have not completed an SFU Privacy Impact Assessment.
7+Evidence (en, 1c374b4e8cf1): users need to ensure that they never input personal or confidential information into AI tools that have not undergone a SFU Privacy Impact Assessment.
8+academic_integrity: When an SFU instructor permits generative AI use, SFU tells students to cite or disclose that use appropriately as part of academic integrity.
9+Evidence (en, 1bc5d31c1fac): Even if your instructor permits the use of GenAI, you must not do so without appropriate citation. This is because you must be transparent about the aids you use as part of commitment to academic integrity.
10+teaching: SFU instructor guidance says instructors should clearly communicate AI-use expectations in assignments, the classroom, and the syllabus.
11+Evidence (en, 4d91c690c7bb): Clearly communicate your expectations regarding AI use in each assignment and in the classroom to your students in the syllabus, during first day of class, and at intervals throughout the semester.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
5 claim records
academic_integrity
SFU tells students that use of generative AI for coursework depends on instructor permission, and students should not assume it is permitted when guidance is unclear or absent.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
SFU guidance for faculty and staff says personal or confidential information should not be entered into AI tools that have not completed an SFU Privacy Impact Assessment.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
When an SFU instructor permits generative AI use, SFU tells students to cite or disclose that use appropriately as part of academic integrity.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
SFU instructor guidance says instructors should clearly communicate AI-use expectations in assignments, the classroom, and the syllabus.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
4 source attributions
Learn with AI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 5:18 AM
Teach with AI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 5:18 AM
Using generative AI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 5:18 AM
Work with AI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 5:18 AM