University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

Simon Fraser University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims5Sources4
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Simon Fraser University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Simon Fraser University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+10-0
11 # Simon Fraser University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: SFU guidance says AI detectors cannot be used for grading decisions or academic misconduct investigations.
3+Evidence (en, 239c0af4dddf): Do not rely on AI detectors, as these tools can be unreliable, biased and may unintentionally comprise your learning and well-being. AI detectors cannot be used for grading decisions or academic misconduct investigations.
4+academic_integrity: SFU tells students that use of generative AI for coursework depends on instructor permission, and students should not assume it is permitted when guidance is unclear or absent.
5+Evidence (en, 1bc5d31c1fac): The only way to know if you are permitted to use generative AI for your course assignments is by checking with your course instructor, who will likely communicate this in the course syllabus. If you are unsure, you must not assume that using generative AI is permitted.
6+privacy: SFU guidance for faculty and staff says personal or confidential information should not be entered into AI tools that have not completed an SFU Privacy Impact Assessment.
7+Evidence (en, 1c374b4e8cf1): users need to ensure that they never input personal or confidential information into AI tools that have not undergone a SFU Privacy Impact Assessment.
8+academic_integrity: When an SFU instructor permits generative AI use, SFU tells students to cite or disclose that use appropriately as part of academic integrity.
9+Evidence (en, 1bc5d31c1fac): Even if your instructor permits the use of GenAI, you must not do so without appropriate citation. This is because you must be transparent about the aids you use as part of commitment to academic integrity.
10+teaching: SFU instructor guidance says instructors should clearly communicate AI-use expectations in assignments, the classroom, and the syllabus.
11+Evidence (en, 4d91c690c7bb): Clearly communicate your expectations regarding AI use in each assignment and in the classroom to your students in the syllabus, during first day of class, and at intervals throughout the semester.

Claim changes

5 claim records

academic_integrity

SFU guidance says AI detectors cannot be used for grading decisions or academic misconduct investigations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

SFU tells students that use of generative AI for coursework depends on instructor permission, and students should not assume it is permitted when guidance is unclear or absent.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

SFU guidance for faculty and staff says personal or confidential information should not be entered into AI tools that have not completed an SFU Privacy Impact Assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

When an SFU instructor permits generative AI use, SFU tells students to cite or disclose that use appropriately as part of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

SFU instructor guidance says instructors should clearly communicate AI-use expectations in assignments, the classroom, and the syllabus.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions