Policy presence
Simon Fraser University has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Burnaby, Canada
Simon Fraser University has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Simon Fraser University has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Simon Fraser University has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Simon Fraser University has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Simon Fraser University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Simon Fraser University has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Simon Fraser University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Simon Fraser University has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: AI detectors are not permitted as grading or misconduct-investigation decision tools under the cited guidance.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Do not rely on AI detectors, as these tools can be unreliable, biased and may unintentionally comprise your learning and well-being. AI detectors cannot be used for grading decisions or academic misconduct investigations.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: Students must follow instructor AI-use guidance and ask before using AI when expectations are unclear.
Original evidence
Evidence 1The only way to know if you are permitted to use generative AI for your course assignments is by checking with your course instructor, who will likely communicate this in the course syllabus. If you are unsure, you must not assume that using generative AI is permitted.
Privacy
Normalized value: Faculty and staff AI use is constrained by SFU PIA status for personal or confidential information.
Original evidence
Evidence 1users need to ensure that they never input personal or confidential information into AI tools that have not undergone a SFU Privacy Impact Assessment.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: Permitted GenAI use still requires appropriate citation or transparent disclosure.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Even if your instructor permits the use of GenAI, you must not do so without appropriate citation. This is because you must be transparent about the aids you use as part of commitment to academic integrity.
Teaching
Normalized value: Instructor guidance emphasizes explicit communication of AI-use expectations.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Clearly communicate your expectations regarding AI use in each assignment and in the classroom to your students in the syllabus, during first day of class, and at intervals throughout the semester.
0 machine or needs-review claim
4 source attribution
sfu.ca
sfu.ca
sfu.ca
sfu.ca