Change log

Queen's University Belfast

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Claims12Sources8Releasepublic-release-20260526-003

University page Public JSON

Queen's University Belfast currently has 12 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

12 claim records

research

Queen's responsible AI research guidance applies to staff, postgraduate research students, visiting researchers, and contractors conducting research under the auspices of the University.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Queen's assessment guidance says module staff will clarify if and how AI can be used in assessment, and students should consult their tutor if in doubt.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Queen's AI position page says its staff and student AI guidance is based on RAISE principles: responsible use, AI best practice, integrity, support, and equitable access.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Queen's assessment guidance says students who misuse AI will be subject to the University's academic misconduct regulations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

research

Queen's responsible AI research guidance expects material AI use in research to be clearly documented and acknowledged, with researchers validating AI-generated content.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

Queen's assessment guidance says text-based AI detectors are not recommended because current tools cannot definitively identify AI-authored content and can produce false positives.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

research

Queen's research AI guidance says AI use in projects involving human participants, personal data, or sensitive information must be outlined in ethics applications.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

Queen's tools guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as available for Queen's University faculty and staff using a @qub.ac.uk email login.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Queen's responsible-use guidance tells users to make an ethical judgment about the information submitted to AI tools and whether they have permission to submit it.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%Evidence1Languagesen

research

Queen's Research Integrity AI page states the fundamental principle that users should not present AI responses as their own and should be clear, open, and transparent in AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Queen's tools guidance says the AI tools listed on the page are for exploration and exclusively with publicly available data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Queen's student AI support page provides student-facing resources including guidance on generative AI in studies, academic success, citing AI, acceptable use, and AI confidence.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence83%Evidence1Languagesen