Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Kyushu University currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
7 claim records
Kyushu University's teacher-facing guidance says AI writing detector results should be treated only as a reference, and suspected AI writing should be judged after giving the student a chance to explain and investigating the situation.
Kyushu University's teacher-facing guidance says that when generative AI use is allowed, instructors should direct students to state quoted AI output, the AI service name, and version, and may request prompts and outputs.
Kyushu University's basic stance says course instructors may set generative AI use rules for individual classes according to each program or course objective, and should indicate those rules to students, such as in the syllabus.
Kyushu University's basic stance says students should check in advance whether use of generative AI output is permitted for papers or works, and if permitted, should clearly indicate AI use or AI quotation.
Kyushu University's basic stance cautions users not to carelessly enter personal, privacy-related, or confidential information into generative AI, and not to carelessly use outputs containing such information.
Kyushu University's student first report warns that submitting copied-and-pasted AI-generated text as a report assignment may constitute misconduct, depending on class or practical-training rules.
Kyushu University's student first report says ChatGPT and similar AI use in education should not simply be prohibited, but students should confirm course rules in the syllabus or with the instructor.
3 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 3:58 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 3:58 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 3:58 AM