teaching
Hiroshima University's policy says teaching staff should revise teaching methods, content, assignments, and evaluation criteria when needed and evaluate student performance appropriately in light of generative AI use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Hiroshima University
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Hiroshima University currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Hiroshima University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Hiroshima University combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+12-0
11 # Hiroshima University AI policy record
2+source_status: Hiroshima University has an official 23 May 2023 page setting out its policy on use of generative AI, including ChatGPT, in educational activities.
3+Evidence (ja, 749412ef815c): ### (2023.5.23) 本学の教育活動における生成AI（ChatGPT等）の利用方針
理事・副学長（教育・平和担当） 鈴木 由美子
4+teaching: Hiroshima University tells course and thesis supervisors to judge whether generative AI may be used in classes or assignments and explain that decision to students through syllabi, guidance, or similar channels.
5+Evidence (ja, 749412ef815c): 授業担当教員や指導教員は、以下の点に留意して授業等を実施する。
1) 授業内やレポート等の課題作成における利用の可否について適切に判断し、シラバスやガイダンス等で学生へ説明する。
6+academic_integrity: Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be told that using AI output as-is may amount to copyright infringement or plagiarism, and that any use or quoted output should be made clear in reports and similar assignments.
7+Evidence (ja, 749412ef815c): 利用を可とする場合は、学生に対して、生成AIの出力結果をそのまま利用することが著作権侵害や剽窃にあたる可能性があること、個人情報や機密情報の漏洩につながること、出力結果が誤っている可能性があるなどの留意点を十分に伝え、細心の注意を払って利用するよう指導する。
8+privacy: Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be warned that AI use can lead to leakage of personal or confidential information and that generated outputs may be incorrect.
9+Evidence (ja, 749412ef815c): 個人情報や機密情報の漏洩につながること、出力結果が誤っている可能性があるなどの留意点を十分に伝え、細心の注意を払って利用するよう指導する。
10+ai_tool_treatment: Hiroshima University's basic policy frames student use of generative AI in coursework around students identifying problems and considering solutions themselves, while users understand AI's mechanisms, benefits, risks, and changing literacy requirements.
11+Evidence (ja, 749412ef815c): 大学での学びは、自らで課題を発見し、自分自身で解決策を考え、そして行動することが基本であり、学生が授業においてChatGPT等の生成AIをレポート等の課題作成に利用する場合には、このことを念頭に置く必要がある。
12+teaching: Hiroshima University's policy says teaching staff should revise teaching methods, content, assignments, and evaluation criteria when needed and evaluate student performance appropriately in light of generative AI use.
13+Evidence (ja, 749412ef815c): 4) 必要に応じて授業の方法や内容、課題、評価基準等を見直し、より効果的な授業実施に努めるとともに、適切に成績評価を行う。
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
6 claim records
privacy
Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be warned that AI use can lead to leakage of personal or confidential information and that generated outputs may be incorrect.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be told that using AI output as-is may amount to copyright infringement or plagiarism, and that any use or quoted output should be made clear in reports and similar assignments.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Hiroshima University tells course and thesis supervisors to judge whether generative AI may be used in classes or assignments and explain that decision to students through syllabi, guidance, or similar channels.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
Hiroshima University's basic policy frames student use of generative AI in coursework around students identifying problems and considering solutions themselves, while users understand AI's mechanisms, benefits, risks, and changing literacy requirements.
Review: Agent reviewed
source_status
Hiroshima University has an official 23 May 2023 page setting out its policy on use of generative AI, including ChatGPT, in educational activities.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
2 source attributions
Use of Generative AI (including ChatGPT) - Academic Support
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 11:41 PM
生成AI（ChatGPT等）の利用について - 学びのサポート - 広島大学
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 11:41 PM