Change log

Hiroshima University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Hiroshima University currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Hiroshima University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+12-0
11 # Hiroshima University AI policy record
2+source_status: Hiroshima University has an official 23 May 2023 page setting out its policy on use of generative AI, including ChatGPT, in educational activities.
3+Evidence (ja, 749412ef815c): ### (2023.5.23) 本学の教育活動における生成AI(ChatGPT等)の利用方針 理事・副学長(教育・平和担当) 鈴木 由美子
4+teaching: Hiroshima University tells course and thesis supervisors to judge whether generative AI may be used in classes or assignments and explain that decision to students through syllabi, guidance, or similar channels.
5+Evidence (ja, 749412ef815c): 授業担当教員や指導教員は、以下の点に留意して授業等を実施する。 1) 授業内やレポート等の課題作成における利用の可否について適切に判断し、シラバスやガイダンス等で学生へ説明する。
6+academic_integrity: Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be told that using AI output as-is may amount to copyright infringement or plagiarism, and that any use or quoted output should be made clear in reports and similar assignments.
7+Evidence (ja, 749412ef815c): 利用を可とする場合は、学生に対して、生成AIの出力結果をそのまま利用することが著作権侵害や剽窃にあたる可能性があること、個人情報や機密情報の漏洩につながること、出力結果が誤っている可能性があるなどの留意点を十分に伝え、細心の注意を払って利用するよう指導する。
8+privacy: Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be warned that AI use can lead to leakage of personal or confidential information and that generated outputs may be incorrect.
9+Evidence (ja, 749412ef815c): 個人情報や機密情報の漏洩につながること、出力結果が誤っている可能性があるなどの留意点を十分に伝え、細心の注意を払って利用するよう指導する。
10+ai_tool_treatment: Hiroshima University's basic policy frames student use of generative AI in coursework around students identifying problems and considering solutions themselves, while users understand AI's mechanisms, benefits, risks, and changing literacy requirements.
11+Evidence (ja, 749412ef815c): 大学での学びは、自らで課題を発見し、自分自身で解決策を考え、そして行動することが基本であり、学生が授業においてChatGPT等の生成AIをレポート等の課題作成に利用する場合には、このことを念頭に置く必要がある。
12+teaching: Hiroshima University's policy says teaching staff should revise teaching methods, content, assignments, and evaluation criteria when needed and evaluate student performance appropriately in light of generative AI use.
13+Evidence (ja, 749412ef815c): 4) 必要に応じて授業の方法や内容、課題、評価基準等を見直し、より効果的な授業実施に努めるとともに、適切に成績評価を行う。

Claim changes

6 claim records

teaching

Hiroshima University's policy says teaching staff should revise teaching methods, content, assignments, and evaluation criteria when needed and evaluate student performance appropriately in light of generative AI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesja

privacy

Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be warned that AI use can lead to leakage of personal or confidential information and that generated outputs may be incorrect.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesja

academic_integrity

Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be told that using AI output as-is may amount to copyright infringement or plagiarism, and that any use or quoted output should be made clear in reports and similar assignments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesja

teaching

Hiroshima University tells course and thesis supervisors to judge whether generative AI may be used in classes or assignments and explain that decision to students through syllabi, guidance, or similar channels.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesja

ai_tool_treatment

Hiroshima University's basic policy frames student use of generative AI in coursework around students identifying problems and considering solutions themselves, while users understand AI's mechanisms, benefits, risks, and changing literacy requirements.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesja

source_status

Hiroshima University has an official 23 May 2023 page setting out its policy on use of generative AI, including ChatGPT, in educational activities.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence2Languagesen, ja

Source snapshots

2 source attributions