Registro de cambios

USI - Università della Svizzera italiana

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Resumen de cambios

Estado actual de actualización y revisión del registro público.

USI - Università della Svizzera italiana currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 may 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para USI - Università della Svizzera italiana. Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.

Aún no se han registrado filas de diferencias de políticas entre versiones para esta universidad. La página sigue rastreando afirmaciones respaldadas por fuentes actuales, atribuciones de fuentes oficiales, estado de revisión, actualidad de las fuentes y JSON públicas para su descubrimiento y citación.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.

Categorías de diferencias

Clasificación semántica para esta diferencia de versión.

Texto de la política0Extraído recientemente0Evidencia0Instantáneas de origen0Texto de origen0Fuente añadida0Fuente eliminada0

Diferencias de versión combinadas

Diferencia del seguimiento unificado generada a partir de todas las instantáneas de lanzamiento público para esta universidad.

USI - Università della Svizzera italiana combined release diferencias

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # USI - Università della Svizzera italiana AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: USI's general rule permits use of generative AI tools unless a specific activity explicitly prohibits them, and says use must be correctly acknowledged.
3+Evidence (en, ce40274d906f): As a general rule the use of generative AI tools is thus permitted, unless explicitly prohibited for a specific activity (e.g. exam, assignment, specific tasks, etc.). However, their use must always be correctly acknowledged.
4+academic_integrity: USI student recommendations say students must follow teachers' instructions for GenAI use in written work; complete drafting of exam papers, dissertations, or final papers with GenAI is generally not permitted, and unauthorised use is academic fraud subject to study-regulation penalties.
5+Evidence (en, 9d961559b95a): In general, when writing exam papers, final papers, theses, etc., students are required to strictly follow their teachers' instructions regarding the use of Gen AI tools. As a general rule, the use of Gen AI tools for the complete drafting of exam papers, dissertations, final papers, etc. is not permitted.
6+source_status: USI maintains a public generative-AI guidance hub and June 2025 recommendations for both students and teaching staff; the Desk page says those recommendations expand and replace earlier 2023 communications.
7+Evidence (en, ce40274d906f): In June 2025, the Recommendations on the use of generative AI in education for USI's faculty and students have been published. These documents expand and replace previous communications of 2023.
8+teaching: USI teaching-staff recommendations advise teachers to clearly communicate what students should, can, and cannot do with GenAI tools for course learning activities and to include relevant information in the course syllabus.
9+Evidence (en, b3622234b5f3): Teachers are advised to clearly communicate at the beginning and during the course what students should /can /cannot do with Gen AI tools for learning activities related to their course. For this purpose, it is recommended to include a section in the course syllabus summarising the relevant information.
10+privacy: USI recommendations say GenAI use should account for data protection and that confidential documents and sensitive data should not be shared with GenAI tools.
11+Evidence (en, 9d961559b95a): Gen AI must be used critically, competently and responsibly, paying particular attention to the trustworthiness of the answers provided, data protection, environmental sustainability aspects, and ensuring that confidential documents and sensitive data are not shared.
12+academic_integrity: USI teaching-staff recommendations strongly discourage reliance on tools designed to detect GenAI-generated text, saying suspected misuse should follow normal misconduct procedures defined in faculty study regulations.
13+Evidence (en, b3622234b5f3): However, it is strongly discouraged to rely on tools designed to detect text generated with the help of Gen AI (e.g. ChatGPTzero and similar). These tools are still unreliable and of little use, as they only provide a statistical estimate without offering any definite proof of the actual use of such tools.

Historial de versiones

0 public release diffs

Cambios en las afirmaciones

6 Afirmación registros

ai_tool_treatment

USI's general rule permits use of generative AI tools unless a specific activity explicitly prohibits them, and says use must be correctly acknowledged.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%Evidencia2Idiomasen

academic_integrity

USI student recommendations say students must follow teachers' instructions for GenAI use in written work; complete drafting of exam papers, dissertations, or final papers with GenAI is generally not permitted, and unauthorised use is academic fraud subject to study-regulation penalties.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%Evidencia2Idiomasen

source_status

USI maintains a public generative-AI guidance hub and June 2025 recommendations for both students and teaching staff; the Desk page says those recommendations expand and replace earlier 2023 communications.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia2Idiomasen

teaching

USI teaching-staff recommendations advise teachers to clearly communicate what students should, can, and cannot do with GenAI tools for course learning activities and to include relevant information in the course syllabus.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia1Idiomasen

privacy

USI recommendations say GenAI use should account for data protection and that confidential documents and sensitive data should not be shared with GenAI tools.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%Evidencia2Idiomasen

academic_integrity

USI teaching-staff recommendations strongly discourage reliance on tools designed to detect GenAI-generated text, saying suspected misuse should follow normal misconduct procedures defined in faculty study regulations.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%Evidencia1Idiomasen

Instantáneas de origen

4 source attributions

Generative AI at USI

official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 may 2026, 23:31

Hash de instantánea
d56fb83d8628ca930feef41ccd133d019dbea241bab6d39837091213524cdfde