Registro de cambios

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Resumen de cambios

Estado actual de actualización y revisión del registro público.

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 11 may 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.

Aún no se han registrado filas de diferencias de políticas entre versiones para esta universidad. La página sigue rastreando afirmaciones respaldadas por fuentes actuales, atribuciones de fuentes oficiales, estado de revisión, actualidad de las fuentes y JSON públicas para su descubrimiento y citación.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.

Categorías de diferencias

Clasificación semántica para esta diferencia de versión.

Texto de la política0Extraído recientemente0Evidencia0Instantáneas de origen0Texto de origen0Fuente añadida0Fuente eliminada0

Diferencias de versión combinadas

Diferencia del seguimiento unificado generada a partir de todas las instantáneas de lanzamiento público para esta universidad.

Universidad of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) combined release diferencias

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+8-0
11 # University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: UCLA Academic Senate guidance quotes the Student Conduct Code requirement that submissions must be the student’s own work or clearly acknowledge the source, and says that unless an instructor indicates otherwise, use of ChatGPT or other AI tools for course assignments is akin to receiving assistance from another person.
3+Evidence (en, 168a58d01102): The UCLA Student Conduct Code states, “Unless otherwise specified by the faculty member, all submissions, whether in draft or final form, to meet course requirements (including a paper, project, exam, computer program, oral presentation, or other work) must either be the Student’s own work, or must clearly acknowledge the source.” Unless an instructor indicates otherwise, the use of ChatGPT or other AI tools for course assignments is akin to receiving assistance from another person
4+privacy: UCLA DTS guidance says users may not input FERPA-protected student information, HIPPA/HIPAA-protected health data, employee personnel/performance data, unpublished research/IP/grant proposals, or export-controlled or restricted data into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment.
5+Evidence (en, c791d23ea915): Users may not input the following into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment: ( any questions regarding the below, please use [email protected] as the intake email for your questions) FERPA-protected student information (IDs, grades, coursework, etc) – UCLA Registrar FERPA Policy HIPPA-protected health data – UCLA Health HIPAA Notice Employee personnel/performance data – UC IS-3 Information Security Policy Unpublished research, IP, or grant proposals – UC Copyright & IP Policy Export-controlled or restricted data – UCLA Export Control Guidance
6+ai_tool_treatment: UCLA DTS AI guidance lists a subset of available generative AI tools including Microsoft Copilot and M365 Copilot, Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise, Google Notebook LM, AWS Bedrock models, and Zoom AI Companion.
7+Evidence (en, c791d23ea915): Please visit the linked page for most up to date tools, a subset of which is listed below: Microsoft Copilot & M365 Copilot Google Gemini (and Gemini for Workspace) OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise Google Notebook LM AWS Bedrock models (Amazon Q, PartyRock, Claude, LLaMA, etc.) Zoom AI Companion (Education license)
8+teaching: UCLA Academic Senate guidance encourages instructors to clarify and communicate expectations to students and to consider incorporating academic integrity policies into the syllabus.
9+Evidence (en, 168a58d01102): Instructors are encouraged to clarify and communicate expectations to students • Consider incorporating academic integrity policies into your syllabus

Historial de versiones

0 public release diffs

Cambios en las afirmaciones

4 Afirmación registros

academic_integrity

UCLA Academic Senate guidance quotes the Student Conduct Code requirement that submissions must be the student’s own work or clearly acknowledge the source, and says that unless an instructor indicates otherwise, use of ChatGPT or other AI tools for course assignments is akin to receiving assistance from another person.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia1Idiomasen

privacy

UCLA DTS guidance says users may not input FERPA-protected student information, HIPPA/HIPAA-protected health data, employee personnel/performance data, unpublished research/IP/grant proposals, or export-controlled or restricted data into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia1Idiomasen

ai_tool_treatment

UCLA DTS AI guidance lists a subset of available generative AI tools including Microsoft Copilot and M365 Copilot, Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise, Google Notebook LM, AWS Bedrock models, and Zoom AI Companion.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza92%Evidencia1Idiomasen

teaching

UCLA Academic Senate guidance encourages instructors to clarify and communicate expectations to students and to consider incorporating academic integrity policies into the syllabus.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza92%Evidencia1Idiomasen

Instantáneas de origen

3 source attributions