Registro de cambios

Norwegian University of Life Sciences

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Resumen de cambios

Estado actual de actualización y revisión del registro público.

Norwegian University of Life Sciences currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 19 may 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para Norwegian University of Life Sciences. Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.

Aún no se han registrado filas de diferencias de políticas entre versiones para esta universidad. La página sigue rastreando afirmaciones respaldadas por fuentes actuales, atribuciones de fuentes oficiales, estado de revisión, actualidad de las fuentes y JSON públicas para su descubrimiento y citación.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.

Categorías de diferencias

Clasificación semántica para esta diferencia de versión.

Texto de la política0Extraído recientemente0Evidencia0Instantáneas de origen0Texto de origen0Fuente añadida0Fuente eliminada0

Diferencias de versión combinadas

Diferencia del seguimiento unificado generada a partir de todas las instantáneas de lanzamiento público para esta universidad.

Norwegian University of Life Sciences combined release diferencias

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # Norwegian University of Life Sciences AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: NMBU's generative AI guidelines require students to clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used, and to account for AI use in assignments or other work submitted for assessment or compulsory activity.
3+Evidence (en, 53fa156a3c82): The student must follow academic norms of honesty, diligence, and openness, and clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used. If the student uses AI-based programs in a submitted assignment or in other work to be submitted for assessment or as a compulsory activity in a course, the student must account for the use.
4+ai_tool_treatment: NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs are permitted in accordance with the guidelines, while individual course descriptions may state that AI-based programs are not permitted for exams or other assessed work.
5+Evidence (en, 53fa156a3c82): At NMBU, the use of AI-based programs is permitted in accordance with these guidelines. In the online course description for each individual course, it may be stated that AI-based programs are not permitted for use in exams or in other work submitted for assessment in the course.
6+ai_tool_treatment: NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs will normally not be permitted in written examinations on campus; for take-home exams, students must follow the AI-use specifications in the exam paper and course description.
7+Evidence (en, 53fa156a3c82): In written examinations on campus, the use of AI-based programs will normally not be permitted. In take-home exams, of shorter or longer duration, the student must comply with specifications regarding the use of AI given in the individual exam paper and in the course description.
8+ai_tool_treatment: NMBU student guidance says each course description should state permitted AI use for assessment and compulsory activities, using three categories: K1 no AI use, K2 specified AI use, and K3 full AI use aligned with NMBU AI guidelines.
9+Evidence (nb, 4556959d8fbc): I emnebeskrivelsen skal det stå informasjon om tillatt bruk av KI i emnet. Dette feltet skal inneholde en beskrivelse av hvordan KI er tillatt brukt ved de forskjellige vurderingsformene og de obligatoriske aktivitetene som emnet har. Det er 3 mulige kategorier av KI-bruk.
10+privacy: NMBU's Norwegian student guidance tells students not to use AI to process personal data or sensitive matters.
11+Evidence (nb, 4556959d8fbc): Det er viktig å: bruke KI som støtte, ikke som erstatning for egen tenkning; kritisk vurdere kvaliteten på svarene du får; alltid oppgi bruk av KI i akademiske arbeider og merk tydelig materiale generert av språkmodeller; ikke bruke KI til å behandle personopplysninger eller sensitive saker.
12+academic_integrity: NMBU's Norwegian cheating and plagiarism page warns that incorrect or improper use of AI tools such as ChatGPT can create suspicion of attempted cheating and/or plagiarism, with possible consequences including annulment and exclusion.
13+Evidence (nb, 2d4d3862a0ca): Husk at feil bruk av kunstig intelligens (KI)/artificial intelligence (AI) som eks. ChatGPT eller andre kan medføre mistanke om forsøk på fusk og/eller plagiering. Dette kan få alvorlige konsekvenser for deg.

Historial de versiones

0 public release diffs

Cambios en las afirmaciones

6 Afirmación registros

academic_integrity

NMBU's Norwegian cheating and plagiarism page warns that incorrect or improper use of AI tools such as ChatGPT can create suspicion of attempted cheating and/or plagiarism, with possible consequences including annulment and exclusion.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza89%Evidencia1Idiomasnb

privacy

NMBU's Norwegian student guidance tells students not to use AI to process personal data or sensitive matters.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%Evidencia1Idiomasnb

ai_tool_treatment

NMBU student guidance says each course description should state permitted AI use for assessment and compulsory activities, using three categories: K1 no AI use, K2 specified AI use, and K3 full AI use aligned with NMBU AI guidelines.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza91%Evidencia1Idiomasnb

ai_tool_treatment

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs will normally not be permitted in written examinations on campus; for take-home exams, students must follow the AI-use specifications in the exam paper and course description.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%Evidencia1Idiomasen

academic_integrity

NMBU's generative AI guidelines require students to clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used, and to account for AI use in assignments or other work submitted for assessment or compulsory activity.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza96%Evidencia1Idiomasen

ai_tool_treatment

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs are permitted in accordance with the guidelines, while individual course descriptions may state that AI-based programs are not permitted for exams or other assessed work.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia1Idiomasen

Instantáneas de origen

4 source attributions