Registro de cambios

Graz University of Technology

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Resumen de cambios

Estado actual de actualización y revisión del registro público.

Graz University of Technology currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 may 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para Graz University of Technology. Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.

Aún no se han registrado filas de diferencias de políticas entre versiones para esta universidad. La página sigue rastreando afirmaciones respaldadas por fuentes actuales, atribuciones de fuentes oficiales, estado de revisión, actualidad de las fuentes y JSON públicas para su descubrimiento y citación.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.

Categorías de diferencias

Clasificación semántica para esta diferencia de versión.

Texto de la política0Extraído recientemente0Evidencia0Instantáneas de origen0Texto de origen0Fuente añadida0Fuente eliminada0

Diferencias de versión combinadas

Diferencia del seguimiento unificado generada a partir de todas las instantáneas de lanzamiento público para esta universidad.

Graz University of Technology combined release diferencias

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Graz University of Technology AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: TU Graz treats AI tools in examinations as unauthorized aids unless they are explicitly permitted, and the public teaching page says unpermitted AI use in assessment can make an examination attempt invalid due to cheating.
3+Evidence (en, b947a55eb873): AI tools during an examination are considered unauthorised in accordance with the section of the statutes on scientific and artistic integrity unless they have been explicitly permitted.
4+teaching: TU Graz says teaching staff decide whether and which AI-supported tools may be used in each course or thesis, with only spell-checking, translation, and stylistic-grammatical improvement generally permitted for students absent broader authorization.
5+Evidence (en, b947a55eb873): Students may generally use AI-based tools and Large Language Models (LLMs) such as DeepL, Grammarly and LanguageTool exclusively for spell-checking, translation, and stylistic-grammatical improvement of their own texts.
6+research: TU Graz's researcher guide explicitly encourages researchers to integrate AI into research processes while applying the AI-TU rule: analyse data, interpret results critically, truth-check results, and use results responsibly.
7+Evidence (en, 24e5ba177d7a): TU Graz researchers are explicitly encouraged to integrate AI into their research processes. As the field is changing so rapidly, this guideline is designed as a "living document" and is intended to outline principles for the use of AI applications rather than provide a list of specific tools.
8+privacy: TU Graz guidance requires transparent labelling of AI-supported tool use where applicable and cautions against entering personal, confidential, trade-secret, or NDA-protected data into AI applications.
9+Evidence (en, b947a55eb873): Teachers in the teaching setting and students in examinations and written work ... are subject to the labelling obligation when using AI-supported tools and are responsible for ensuring compliance with the legal regulations.
10+ai_tool_treatment: TU Graz states that Academic AI is available to all TU Graz employees and is intended to provide a secure AI environment respecting data protection and information security.
11+Evidence (en, 49b60c9fea14): The Academic AI is available to all TU Graz employees. The goal of this initiative is to create a secure environment for using AI while respecting data protection and information security.

Historial de versiones

0 public release diffs

Cambios en las afirmaciones

5 Afirmación registros

ai_tool_treatment

TU Graz states that Academic AI is available to all TU Graz employees and is intended to provide a secure AI environment respecting data protection and information security.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%Evidencia2Idiomasen

research

TU Graz's researcher guide explicitly encourages researchers to integrate AI into research processes while applying the AI-TU rule: analyse data, interpret results critically, truth-check results, and use results responsibly.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia2Idiomasen

privacy

TU Graz guidance requires transparent labelling of AI-supported tool use where applicable and cautions against entering personal, confidential, trade-secret, or NDA-protected data into AI applications.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza93%Evidencia3Idiomasen

academic_integrity

TU Graz treats AI tools in examinations as unauthorized aids unless they are explicitly permitted, and the public teaching page says unpermitted AI use in assessment can make an examination attempt invalid due to cheating.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%Evidencia2Idiomasen

teaching

TU Graz says teaching staff decide whether and which AI-supported tools may be used in each course or thesis, with only spell-checking, translation, and stylistic-grammatical improvement generally permitted for students absent broader authorization.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza94%Evidencia2Idiomasen

Instantáneas de origen

4 source attributions