University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

APIGitHub

Change log

University of Greenwich

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Claims5Sources3
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Greenwich currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 20, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

University of Greenwich current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+10-0
11 # University of Greenwich AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: The University of Greenwich 2025 Assessment and Feedback Policy says staff will provide students with the university guide on referencing generative AI, a video on using AI effectively, and the Declaration of AI use via the VLE to support understanding of acceptable AI usage in assessments.
3+Evidence (en, 988172169e72): Staff will provide students with the university’s guide on referencing generative AI, video on using AI effectively and Declaration of AI use via the VLE to support students’ understanding of acceptable AI usage in assessments.
4+teaching: The University of Greenwich 2025 Assessment and Feedback Policy says assessment will be designed to maintain integrity and standards where students have access to generative AI, and encourages staff to incorporate generative AI as a learning tool while facilitating responsible student use.
5+Evidence (en, 988172169e72): Learning technologies shall be used with consideration of potential biases and limitations of automation. Assessment will be designed to ensure that integrity and standards are maintained where students have access to generative AI, without sacrificing the importance of authenticity of assessment and pedagogic practice. Staff are encouraged to incorporate generative AI as a learning tool and equally facilitate responsible AI usage from students.
6+ai_tool_treatment: University of Greenwich student AI guidance encourages students to use AI to aid learning, while telling students to acknowledge AI use in assignments by adding a declaration and not to copy and paste directly from an AI tool for submitted English-language work.
7+Evidence (en, d4ded79cb560): We encourage you to use AI in your studies ... However, you must not copy and paste directly from an AI tool as your written English is an assessed element of all work written in the English language, and submitted work must always be your own. ... If you use AI in the process of undertaking your assignment, for example to create an outline of your assignment or to summarize articles, you should acknowledge this by adding a declaration at the end of your work.
8+privacy: For students who opt to use Studiosity, University of Greenwich says it processes personal data including name, email, course, student ID, and content of interactions with Studiosity tutors, and that Studiosity is an independent data controller based in Australia.
9+Evidence (en, fd2de78fc0cf): The University of Greenwich processes the following personal data about you if you opt to use the Studiosity service: First name, last name, email address; Course; Student ID; Content of your interactions with Studiosity tutors ... Studiosity is an independent data controller based in Australia.
10+ai_tool_treatment: University of Greenwich describes Studiosity+ as an online service for eligible Greenwich students that uses AI to generate academic-writing feedback, with AI trained by subject specialists and feedback monitored by specialists.
11+Evidence (en, fd2de78fc0cf): The University has teamed up with Studiosity+ to bring you an online service that can help improve your academic writing skills. Studiosity+ will allow you to upload almost complete drafts of your essays, reports and other written assessment types. Studiosity+ uses AI to generate feedback on your writing. The AI has been trained by subject specialists, and specialists monitor the feedback you receive.

Claim changes

5 claim records

privacy

For students who opt to use Studiosity, University of Greenwich says it processes personal data including name, email, course, student ID, and content of interactions with Studiosity tutors, and that Studiosity is an independent data controller based in Australia.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Greenwich describes Studiosity+ as an online service for eligible Greenwich students that uses AI to generate academic-writing feedback, with AI trained by subject specialists and feedback monitored by specialists.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

The University of Greenwich 2025 Assessment and Feedback Policy says staff will provide students with the university guide on referencing generative AI, a video on using AI effectively, and the Declaration of AI use via the VLE to support understanding of acceptable AI usage in assessments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

The University of Greenwich 2025 Assessment and Feedback Policy says assessment will be designed to maintain integrity and standards where students have access to generative AI, and encourages staff to incorporate generative AI as a learning tool while facilitating responsible student use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Greenwich student AI guidance encourages students to use AI to aid learning, while telling students to acknowledge AI use in assignments by adding a declaration and not to copy and paste directly from an AI tool for submitted English-language work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

3 source attributions