University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

University of Gothenburg

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Claims8Sources5
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Gothenburg currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

University of Gothenburg current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+16-0
11 # University of Gothenburg AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: The University of Gothenburg study-rules PDF states that, for take-home examinations, written tasks, or equivalent, AI-generated content may not be presented as one’s own work and examiners should specify the limits for permitted use of generative AI tools.
3+Evidence (en, 20d3a923cadc): With regard to the use of generative AI tools, AI-generated content may not be presented as one’s own work, as this is considered misleading. In the task instructions, the examiner should specify the limits for the permitted use of generative AI tools.
4+ai_tool_treatment: University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not prohibit generative AI in education; teachers and examiners decide whether, when, and how it may be used in coursework and examinations.
5+Evidence (sv, d8bc74eae533): Göteborgs universitet förbjuder inte användning av generativ AI i utbildning. Istället är det upp till lärare och examinatorer att själva avgöra om, när och hur generativ AI kan användas i kursarbete och examinationer.
6+teaching: University of Gothenburg student guidance says generative-AI guidelines vary between courses, programmes, departments, and faculties, and that teachers and examiners are responsible for communicating those guidelines to students.
7+Evidence (sv, d8bc74eae533): Riktlinjer för generativ AI varierar mellan kurser, program, avdelningar och fakulteter. Det är lärare och examinatorer som ansvarar för att kommunicera riktlinjer kring generativ AI till studenter.
8+academic_integrity: University of Gothenburg student guidance on cheating says generative AI use counts as cheating when it is used to complete an examination task the student is expected to do independently, to present AI-generated material as the student’s own work, or in other ways prohibited in the course or programme.
9+Evidence (sv, 2e64bd586383): Generativ AI kan skapa nytt innehåll. Universitetet förbjuder inte användning av generativ AI, men det räknas som fusk om du använder det för att: Genomföra en examinationsuppgift som du som student förväntas göra själv; Presenterar AI-genererad text eller annat material som om det vore ditt eget arbete; Även andra sätt att använda generativ AI kan vara otillåtna i din kurs eller i ditt program.
10+ai_tool_treatment: University of Gothenburg PIL guidance says all staff and students have access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, employees have access to ChatGPT Edu, and Microsoft 365 Copilot can be requested with manager approval because its cost is charged to the department or equivalent.
11+Evidence (en, 63ab5ee91240): At present, all staff and students have access to the chat service Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat. In addition, employees have access to ChatGPT Edu. It is also possible to request access to the extended version of Copilot, Microsoft 365 Copilot; however, this service comes with a cost that is charged to the department or equivalent, and therefore an order requires approval from a manager.
12+academic_integrity: University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not recommend checking student work with an AI-detection tool because existing tools are unreliable.
13+Evidence (sv, d8bc74eae533): Det är viktigt att notera att universitetet inte rekommenderar att kontrollera ditt arbete med en AI-detektionsverktyg eftersom befintliga verktyg är opålitliga.
14+ai_tool_treatment: A University of Gothenburg PIL page says that, for examinations, the university regards generative AI as a tool and applies the university’s rules for first- and second-cycle studies.
15+Evidence (sv, 31c02c587964): När det gäller examinationer ser Göteborgs universitet generativ AI som ett verktyg och universitetets regler för studier på grundnivå och avancerad nivå tillämpas.
16+privacy: University of Gothenburg PIL guidance advises caution with services not offered through the university because they have not been reviewed for legal or security issues, and says users should not share personal data or sensitive information; the page says this also applied to Microsoft Bing Chat/Copilot at the time of publication.
17+Evidence (en, 63ab5ee91240): There is also some complexity regarding the use of services not offered through the university since they have not been scrutinized from, for example, legal perspectives, or in terms of security. Therefore, users of these services are advised to exercise caution. It is, for instance, very important not to share any personal data or sensitive information. This also applies to Microsoft Bing Chat/Copilot at present, even though it is offered through the university.

Claim changes

8 claim records

academic_integrity

The University of Gothenburg study-rules PDF states that, for take-home examinations, written tasks, or equivalent, AI-generated content may not be presented as one’s own work and examiners should specify the limits for permitted use of generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not prohibit generative AI in education; teachers and examiners decide whether, when, and how it may be used in coursework and examinations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagessv

teaching

University of Gothenburg student guidance says generative-AI guidelines vary between courses, programmes, departments, and faculties, and that teachers and examiners are responsible for communicating those guidelines to students.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagessv

academic_integrity

University of Gothenburg student guidance on cheating says generative AI use counts as cheating when it is used to complete an examination task the student is expected to do independently, to present AI-generated material as the student’s own work, or in other ways prohibited in the course or programme.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagessv

ai_tool_treatment

University of Gothenburg PIL guidance says all staff and students have access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat, employees have access to ChatGPT Edu, and Microsoft 365 Copilot can be requested with manager approval because its cost is charged to the department or equivalent.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not recommend checking student work with an AI-detection tool because existing tools are unreliable.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagessv

ai_tool_treatment

A University of Gothenburg PIL page says that, for examinations, the university regards generative AI as a tool and applies the university’s rules for first- and second-cycle studies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagessv

privacy

University of Gothenburg PIL guidance advises caution with services not offered through the university because they have not been reviewed for legal or security issues, and says users should not share personal data or sensitive information; the page says this also applied to Microsoft Bing Chat/Copilot at the time of publication.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

5 source attributions