Change log

University of Dundee

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Dundee currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Dundee. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

University of Dundee combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+14-0
11 # University of Dundee AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: University of Dundee student guidance says GAI tools should not be used to generate essays or assessment answers that are then submitted as the student's own work.
3+Evidence (en, 7f54382d25f9): GAI tools should not be used to generate an essay or answers to assessments and which are then submitted as your own work.
4+academic_integrity: University of Dundee guidance states that submitting work that is not one's own, including unauthorised use of GAI, is considered academic misconduct.
5+Evidence (en, 479326cd30df): Submitting work which is not your own, and the unauthorised use of GAI, is considered academic misconduct.
6+academic_integrity: Where lecturers permit GAI sources in assessment work, University of Dundee student guidance says students must transparently acknowledge, describe, and reference how they used GAI.
7+Evidence (en, 7f54382d25f9): If your lecturers have made clear in your assessment brief that you may use GAI sources in your work then you must be transparent in acknowledging, describing, and referencing how you have used it.
8+privacy: University of Dundee student guidance warns students not to share personal data, confidential university material, research data, or intellectual property in GAI platforms.
9+Evidence (en, 7f54382d25f9): You should ensure that you do not share personal data (yours, or anyone else’s), nor confidential university material.
10+teaching: University of Dundee staff guidance says lecturers should not use unauthorised AI detection tools because the University has not approved them and does not have student consent to upload work to third-party sites.
11+Evidence (en, b8244e63b10f): Our earlier guidance also highlighted that lecturers should *NOT* use unauthorised AI detection tools. This remains the case. We have not approved any of these tools and we do not have student consent to upload their work to third party sites.
12+source_status: University of Dundee student guidance says the University does not impose a blanket restriction on generative AI and instead promotes discerning, transparent, and ethical use.
13+Evidence (en, 7f54382d25f9): It is not feasible for the University to impose a blanket restriction on the use of GAI, rather we seek to promote the discerning, transparent and ethical use of it.
14+teaching: University of Dundee staff guidance says students cannot be compelled to sign up for GenAI tools as part of learning, even when the tools are free to use.
15+Evidence (en, b8244e63b10f): It is therefore important to remember that we cannot compel students to sign up to use these tools as part of their learning even if they are free to use.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

7 claim records

academic_integrity

University of Dundee student guidance says GAI tools should not be used to generate essays or assessment answers that are then submitted as the student's own work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Dundee guidance states that submitting work that is not one's own, including unauthorised use of GAI, is considered academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Where lecturers permit GAI sources in assessment work, University of Dundee student guidance says students must transparently acknowledge, describe, and reference how they used GAI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

University of Dundee student guidance warns students not to share personal data, confidential university material, research data, or intellectual property in GAI platforms.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

University of Dundee staff guidance says lecturers should not use unauthorised AI detection tools because the University has not approved them and does not have student consent to upload work to third-party sites.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

University of Dundee student guidance says the University does not impose a blanket restriction on generative AI and instead promotes discerning, transparent, and ethical use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

University of Dundee staff guidance says students cannot be compelled to sign up for GenAI tools as part of learning, even when the tools are free to use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions