Policy presence
University of Dundee has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Dundee, United Kingdom
University of Dundee is listed as QS 2026 rank =428. University of Dundee has 7 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
v1 public contract
University of Dundee is listed as QS 2026 rank =428. University of Dundee has 7 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Dundee as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 7 source-backed claims, including 7 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-dundee.json. The entity-level confidence is 97%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
University of Dundee has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
University of Dundee has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Dundee has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Dundee has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Dundee has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Dundee has 4 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Dundee has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
University of Dundee has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Dundee has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
University of Dundee has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: gai_assessment_answers_not_as_own_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1GAI tools should not be used to generate an essay or answers to assessments and which are then submitted as your own work.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: unauthorised_gai_academic_misconduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1Submitting work which is not your own, and the unauthorised use of GAI, is considered academic misconduct.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: permitted_gai_requires_acknowledgement_description_reference
Original evidence
Evidence 1If your lecturers have made clear in your assessment brief that you may use GAI sources in your work then you must be transparent in acknowledging, describing, and referencing how you have used it.
Privacy
Normalized value: do_not_share_personal_confidential_research_ip_data
Original evidence
Evidence 1You should ensure that you do not share personal data (yours, or anyone else’s), nor confidential university material.
Teaching
Normalized value: lecturers_should_not_use_unauthorised_ai_detection_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1Our earlier guidance also highlighted that lecturers should *NOT* use unauthorised AI detection tools. This remains the case. We have not approved any of these tools and we do not have student consent to upload their work to third party sites.
Source Status
Normalized value: no_blanket_restriction_transparent_ethical_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1It is not feasible for the University to impose a blanket restriction on the use of GAI, rather we seek to promote the discerning, transparent and ethical use of it.
Teaching
Normalized value: students_not_compelled_to_signup_for_genai_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1It is therefore important to remember that we cannot compel students to sign up to use these tools as part of their learning even if they are free to use.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
4 source attribution
libguides.dundee.ac.uk
dundee.ac.uk
dundee.ac.uk
dundee.ac.uk
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.