University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

Université Paris-Saclay

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 12, 2026Last changedMay 12, 2026Claims5Sources3
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Université Paris-Saclay currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 12, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Université Paris-Saclay current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+10-0
11 # Université Paris-Saclay AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Université Paris-Saclay's 2025-2026 first-cycle exam rules say that, for Licence professionnelle, Licence, and Licence double-diplôme students covered by the rules, use of ChatGPT or another AI tool must be explicitly mentioned when it is not prohibited, and failure to mention AI as a source will be sanctioned.
3+Evidence (fr, 7903b0c55e2e): Les règles présentées dans ce document s'appliquent à tous les étudiants inscrits en Licence professionnelle, Licence et Licence double-diplôme de l'Université Paris-Saclay. L'utilisation de ChatGPT ou tout autre outil ayant recours à l'IA (Intelligence Artificielle) devra être mentionnée de façon explicite (quand elle n'est pas interdite), comme n'importe quel emprunt ou citation d'une source externe. Le non-respect de la mention de l'IA comme source se verra sanctionné.
4+academic_integrity: Université Paris-Saclay's 2025-2026 master exam rules say that use of ChatGPT or another AI tool must be explicitly mentioned when it is not prohibited, like any external source borrowing or citation, and failure to mention AI as a source will be sanctioned.
5+Evidence (fr, 1ae3590206bb): Règlement des études, MCC et charte des examens des formations de master de l’Université Paris-Saclay 2025-2026. L’utilisation de ChatGPT ou tout autre outil ayant recours à l’IA (Intelligence Artificielle) devra être mentionnée de façon explicite (quand elle n’est pas interdite), comme n’importe quel emprunt ou citation d’une source externe. Le non-respect de la mention de l’IA comme source se verra sanctionné.
6+teaching: Université Paris-Saclay's official IAG working-group article says the group aims to familiarize teacher-researchers and students with generative AI and orient them toward good practices in teaching and research.
7+Evidence (fr, dac655c6b64a): Ce groupe de travail a pour un double objectif d'acculturer les enseignants-chercheurs et étudiants et d'orienter vers de bonnes pratiques de l'Intelligence artificielle générative (IAG) dans l'enseignement et la recherche.
8+teaching: The Université Paris-Saclay IAG working-group article describes ongoing reflections on student competencies at the end of first and second cycles, the academic dissertation in the generative-AI era, and how generative AI should be integrated or controlled in university work.
9+Evidence (fr, dac655c6b64a): Les réflexions en cours portent notamment sur : Les compétences attendues des étudiants en fin de premiers et seconds cycles L’évolution du concept de mémoire académique à l’ère de l’IA générative La manière dont l’IA générative doit être intégrée ou contrôlée dans les travaux universitaires
10+teaching: In the Graduate School Droit context, the Université Paris-Saclay IAG working-group article says a guide of good practices and evaluation support for law teacher-researchers is being drafted.
11+Evidence (fr, dac655c6b64a): Le groupe de travail mène une réflexion sur les compétences d'un futur juriste dans ce nouveau contexte d'Intelligence artificielle générative et sur leurs évaluations. Un guide de « bonnes pratiques » et d’aide à l’évaluation destiné aux enseignants-chercheurs en Droit est en cours de rédaction.

Claim changes

5 claim records

teaching

In the Graduate School Droit context, the Université Paris-Saclay IAG working-group article says a guide of good practices and evaluation support for law teacher-researchers is being drafted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%Evidence1Languagesfr

teaching

The Université Paris-Saclay IAG working-group article describes ongoing reflections on student competencies at the end of first and second cycles, the academic dissertation in the generative-AI era, and how generative AI should be integrated or controlled in university work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%Evidence1Languagesfr

teaching

Université Paris-Saclay's official IAG working-group article says the group aims to familiarize teacher-researchers and students with generative AI and orient them toward good practices in teaching and research.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesfr

academic_integrity

Université Paris-Saclay's 2025-2026 master exam rules say that use of ChatGPT or another AI tool must be explicitly mentioned when it is not prohibited, like any external source borrowing or citation, and failure to mention AI as a source will be sanctioned.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesfr

academic_integrity

Université Paris-Saclay's 2025-2026 first-cycle exam rules say that, for Licence professionnelle, Licence, and Licence double-diplôme students covered by the rules, use of ChatGPT or another AI tool must be explicitly mentioned when it is not prohibited, and failure to mention AI as a source will be sanctioned.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesfr

Source snapshots

3 source attributions