teaching
UAM provides a basic guide for teachers and students with recommendations for appropriate use of generative AI in university education.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Change log
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
4 claim records
UAM provides a basic guide for teachers and students with recommendations for appropriate use of generative AI in university education.
UAM's guide frames generative AI recommendations as suggestions that do not replace the capacity, creativity, or autonomous work of teachers and students, and are not sufficient by themselves for class preparation or assessment tasks.
UAM's guide recommends that students avoid providing generative AI tools with personal or sensitive information that could be used to train or feed the tool.
For graded work, UAM's guide recommends that teachers specify which tools are permitted and ask students to reference any assistive technologies they used.
1 source attribution
official_pdf checked May 15, 2026