University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

Sabanci University

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims4Sources2
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Sabanci University currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Sabanci University current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+8-0
11 # Sabanci University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Sabancı University's student academic integrity handbook states that submitting text generated by text-generating AI applications such as ChatGPT in place of assignments students are supposed to write themselves violates the six principles of academic integrity.
3+Evidence (tr, 336352cb23fb): Metin üreten yapay zekâ uygulamalarının (ChatGPT gibi) ürettiği metinleri bizzat kendiniz yazmanız gereken ödevler yerine sunarsanız, akademik dürüstlüğün altı prensibini ihlal etmiş olursunuz.
4+academic_integrity: Sabancı University's student academic integrity handbook says students can include text generated by applications such as ChatGPT in assignments if the instructor accepts it and the text is cited and referenced using the APA method for AI-generated text.
5+Evidence (tr, 336352cb23fb): Şayet öğretmeniniz kabul ederse, ChatGPT gibi metin üreten uygulamaların ürettiği metni Amerikan Psikoloji Birliği’nin (APA) yapay zeka üretimi metinler için belirlediği alıntı yapma ve referans verme yöntemiyle ödevlerinize dahil etmeniz mümkün.
6+privacy: Sabancı University Information Center guidance warns users not to share sensitive or personal information with AI tools because generative AI tools collect and store user data and may be vulnerable to data breaches.
7+Evidence (tr, e5ddaae16740): Diğer dijital araçlar gibi, üretken AI araçları da kullanıcılar hakkında veri toplar ve depolar. Dikkatli olun ve AI araçlarıyla hassas veya kişisel bilgilerinizi paylaşmayın.
8+teaching: Sabancı University Information Center guidance says that if students use generative AI, they need to disclose which tool or tools they used and how they used them.
9+Evidence (tr, e5ddaae16740): Üretken AI kullanıyorsanız, hangi aracı veya araçları kullandığınızı ve hangi şekilde kullandığınızı açıklamanız gerekir.

Claim changes

4 claim records

academic_integrity

Sabancı University's student academic integrity handbook states that submitting text generated by text-generating AI applications such as ChatGPT in place of assignments students are supposed to write themselves violates the six principles of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagestr

academic_integrity

Sabancı University's student academic integrity handbook says students can include text generated by applications such as ChatGPT in assignments if the instructor accepts it and the text is cited and referenced using the APA method for AI-generated text.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagestr

privacy

Sabancı University Information Center guidance warns users not to share sensitive or personal information with AI tools because generative AI tools collect and store user data and may be vulnerable to data breaches.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagestr

teaching

Sabancı University Information Center guidance says that if students use generative AI, they need to disclose which tool or tools they used and how they used them.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagestr

Source snapshots

2 source attributions