Policy presence
Sabanci University has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Istanbul, Türkiye
Sabanci University
Sabanci University is listed as QS 2026 rank =404. Sabanci University has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Sabanci University is listed as QS 2026 rank =404. Sabanci University has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Sabanci University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/sabanci-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 92%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Sabanci University has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Sabanci University has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Sabanci University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
Sabanci University has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Sabanci University has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
Sabanci University has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Sabanci University has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Sabancı University's student academic integrity handbook states that submitting text generated by text-generating AI applications such as ChatGPT in place of assignments students are supposed to write themselves violates the six principles of academic integrity.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Generated AI text submitted as own required writing violates academic integrity principles.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Metin üreten yapay zekâ uygulamalarının (ChatGPT gibi) ürettiği metinleri bizzat kendiniz yazmanız gereken ödevler yerine sunarsanız, akademik dürüstlüğün altı prensibini ihlal etmiş olursunuz.
Localized display only
If students submit text generated by text-producing AI applications such as ChatGPT in place of assignments they must write themselves, they violate the six principles of academic integrity.
Academic Integrity
Sabancı University's student academic integrity handbook says students can include text generated by applications such as ChatGPT in assignments if the instructor accepts it and the text is cited and referenced using the APA method for AI-generated text.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Instructor acceptance and citation condition for ChatGPT-style generated text.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Şayet öğretmeniniz kabul ederse, ChatGPT gibi metin üreten uygulamaların ürettiği metni Amerikan Psikoloji Birliği’nin (APA) yapay zeka üretimi metinler için belirlediği alıntı yapma ve referans verme yöntemiyle ödevlerinize dahil etmeniz mümkün.
Localized display only
If the instructor accepts it, text generated by applications such as ChatGPT can be included in assignments using APA citation and reference methods for AI-generated text.
Privacy
Sabancı University Information Center guidance warns users not to share sensitive or personal information with AI tools because generative AI tools collect and store user data and may be vulnerable to data breaches.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Avoid sharing sensitive or personal information with AI tools.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Diğer dijital araçlar gibi, üretken AI araçları da kullanıcılar hakkında veri toplar ve depolar. Dikkatli olun ve AI araçlarıyla hassas veya kişisel bilgilerinizi paylaşmayın.
Localized display only
Like other digital tools, generative AI tools collect and store user data; users should be careful and not share sensitive or personal information with AI tools.
Teaching
Sabancı University Information Center guidance says that if students use generative AI, they need to disclose which tool or tools they used and how they used them.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Library guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed with tool and use details.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Üretken AI kullanıyorsanız, hangi aracı veya araçları kullandığınızı ve hangi şekilde kullandığınızı açıklamanız gerekir.
Localized display only
If using generative AI, users need to explain which tool or tools they used and how they used them.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
Sabancı Üniversitesi Öğrenciler İçin Akademik Dürüstlük El Kitabı
ciad.sabanciuniv.edu
Yapay Zeka | Bilgi Merkezi
bm.sabanciuniv.edu
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.