Istanbul, Türkiye

Sabanci University

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources2Source languagetrPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/sabanci-university.json

Policy profile

Coverage score90/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence76%

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

Sabancı University's student academic integrity handbook states that submitting text generated by text-generating AI applications such as ChatGPT in place of assignments students are supposed to write themselves violates the six principles of academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: Generated AI text submitted as own required writing violates academic integrity principles.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Metin üreten yapay zekâ uygulamalarının (ChatGPT gibi) ürettiği metinleri bizzat kendiniz yazmanız gereken ödevler yerine sunarsanız, akademik dürüstlüğün altı prensibini ihlal etmiş olursunuz.

Localized display only

If students submit text generated by text-producing AI applications such as ChatGPT in place of assignments they must write themselves, they violate the six principles of academic integrity.

Academic Integrity

Sabancı University's student academic integrity handbook says students can include text generated by applications such as ChatGPT in assignments if the instructor accepts it and the text is cited and referenced using the APA method for AI-generated text.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: Instructor acceptance and citation condition for ChatGPT-style generated text.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Şayet öğretmeniniz kabul ederse, ChatGPT gibi metin üreten uygulamaların ürettiği metni Amerikan Psikoloji Birliği’nin (APA) yapay zeka üretimi metinler için belirlediği alıntı yapma ve referans verme yöntemiyle ödevlerinize dahil etmeniz mümkün.

Localized display only

If the instructor accepts it, text generated by applications such as ChatGPT can be included in assignments using APA citation and reference methods for AI-generated text.

Privacy

Sabancı University Information Center guidance warns users not to share sensitive or personal information with AI tools because generative AI tools collect and store user data and may be vulnerable to data breaches.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: Avoid sharing sensitive or personal information with AI tools.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Diğer dijital araçlar gibi, üretken AI araçları da kullanıcılar hakkında veri toplar ve depolar. Dikkatli olun ve AI araçlarıyla hassas veya kişisel bilgilerinizi paylaşmayın.

Localized display only

Like other digital tools, generative AI tools collect and store user data; users should be careful and not share sensitive or personal information with AI tools.

Teaching

Sabancı University Information Center guidance says that if students use generative AI, they need to disclose which tool or tools they used and how they used them.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: Library guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed with tool and use details.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Üretken AI kullanıyorsanız, hangi aracı veya araçları kullandığınızı ve hangi şekilde kullandığınızı açıklamanız gerekir.

Localized display only

If using generative AI, users need to explain which tool or tools they used and how they used them.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities