What this record update means
Structured record overview
Records involved: 39 (30 corrected / adjusted · 9 added)
Ai Tool Treatment · Teaching · 7 more topics
No independently reviewed summary is available for this revision yet.
This is a historical record summary, not confirmation of current permission or a new university rule.
Academic integrity · Records involved: 4 (3 corrected / adjusted · 1 added)
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo states that submitting AI-generated answers by copy-pasting them entirely provides no learning effect and should basically not be permitted.
New textUTokyo states that submitting AI-generated answers by copy-pasting them entirely provides no learning effect and should basically not be permitted.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo states it is unacceptable to present AI-generated text as one's own when submitting class assignments.
New textUTokyo states it is unacceptable to present AI-generated text as one's own when submitting class assignments.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo policy states that even when AI use is allowed, simply copying and pasting AI-generated answers should not be accepted as it provides no learning effect.
New textUTokyo policy states that even when AI use is allowed, simply copying and pasting AI-generated answers should not be accepted as it provides no learning effect.
Record addition
Added
+When students submit reports that utilized generative AI tools, course instructors are officially recommended to have students clearly specify which generative AI tools were used; specific attribution format and disclosure requirements remain at faculty discretion.
Teaching · Records involved: 10 (6 corrected / adjusted · 4 added)
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo leaves decisions on AI tool use in individual classes to faculty, who should decide based on maximizing educational effectiveness rather than following a blanket university rule.
New textUTokyo leaves decisions on AI tool use in individual classes to faculty, who should decide based on maximizing educational effectiveness rather than following a blanket university rule.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo warns faculty not to over-rely on AI detection tools, as they are insufficient evidence of inappropriate student AI use given the rapid evolution of generative tools.
New textUTokyo warns faculty not to over-rely on AI detection tools, as they are insufficient evidence of inappropriate student AI use given the rapid evolution of generative tools.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo leaves the decision on whether to allow AI tools and the conditions for their use to the discretion of individual instructors, varying by class.
New textUTokyo leaves the decision on whether to allow AI tools and the conditions for their use to the discretion of individual instructors, varying by class.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo advises faculty to test their own assignments with generative AI tools to understand how well AI can complete them, and use this understanding to inform assessment design.
New textUTokyo advises faculty to test their own assignments with generative AI tools to understand how well AI can complete them, and use this understanding to inform assessment design.
Site correction
Site conclusion text changes
−Old textUTokyo requires instructors to clearly state their AI stance per class/assignment, and when allowing AI use, to explain risks: information leakage, data concentration, copyright concerns, and potential bias.
+New textUTokyo requires course instructors to clearly designate permitted AI use, which effective September 29, 2026 must be configured in UTOL using standardized labels (T0–T5 or Other).
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo warns faculty that AI detection tools should not be over-relied upon, as their judgments are insufficient evidence of inappropriate student AI use.
New textUTokyo warns faculty that AI detection tools should not be over-relied upon, as their judgments are insufficient evidence of inappropriate student AI use.
Record addition
Added
+Effective September 29, 2026, setting 'Permitted AI Use' is mandatory for all assignment creation in UTOL (UTokyo Online Learning), requiring course instructors to designate a standardized permission level or provide explicit custom instructions.
Record addition
Added
+UTOL assignments classify permitted generative AI use into six standardized ranges (T0 No AI Use; T1 questions/research only; T2 discussion/idea-bouncing; T3 feedback; T4 drafting; T5 creative use) or 'Other' with required written explanation.
Record addition
Added
+The University of Tokyo educational AI framework classifies typical AI use scenarios into five sequential categories (S1 questions/research; S2 discussion/idea-bouncing; S3 feedback; S4 drafting; S5 creative use) mapping directly to UTOL assignment permission labels T0–T5.
Record addition
Added
+Generative AI tool licensing and technical availability never grant automatic coursework assessment permission; use in assignments or exams is strictly governed by the course instructor's syllabus and UTOL assignment settings.
Privacy · Records involved: 4 (3 corrected / adjusted · 1 added)
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo requires instructors who allow AI use to explain associated risks to students: information leakage, data concentration in few companies, copyright concerns, and potential bias.
New textUTokyo requires instructors who allow AI use to explain associated risks to students: information leakage, data concentration in few companies, copyright concerns, and potential bias.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo instructs faculty not to input exam questions directly into generative AI tools, as exams are highly confidential documents.
New textUTokyo instructs faculty not to input exam questions directly into generative AI tools, as exams are highly confidential documents.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo warns students to never input confidential information, personal information, or unpublished research results into AI tools, as the information might be leaked or used for AI training.
New textUTokyo warns students to never input confidential information, personal information, or unpublished research results into AI tools, as the information might be leaked or used for AI training.
Record addition
Added
+Under official faculty guidance and student notices, students and faculty are cautioned against information leakage: students must never input confidential information, personal information, or unpublished research results into AI tools due to potential leakage or model training use, and faculty are instructed that examination questions, being highly confidential documents, must basically (基本的に) not be input into language-generating AI in unchanged form. The separate 'Security Guidelines for Generative AI Use' (March 12, 2024) require internal UTokyo Account authentication and are held as an unverified private source.
Security Review · Records involved: 1 (1 corrected / adjusted)
Site correction
Site conclusion text changes
−Old textUTokyo has established security guidelines for generative AI use (March 2024), referenced in the AI service policy.
+New textHistorical March2024 interim service notice (not a current comprehensive service inventory): The public March27,2024 notice links to Security Guidelines for Generative AI Use dated March12,2024. Only the reference/title was captured; its authenticated full text and detailed requirements remain unverified.
Research · Records involved: 1 (1 added)
Record addition
Added
+Under Rule No. 79 (東京大学科学研究行動規範委員会規則), formal scientific research misconduct investigations establish procedural timelines qualified in principle (原則として): the preliminary inquiry results must be reported to the Committee Chair in principle within 30 days of receiving an allegation (Art. 8(5)); the Investigation Committee commences formal investigation in principle within 30 days of the decision to investigate (Art. 9(2)); the Committee makes its adjudication determination in principle within 150 days of starting formal investigation (Art. 11(1)); respondent defense opportunity is granted in principle within 14 days of receiving draft determination notification (Art. 11(7)); and a respondent against whom misconduct was determined may file an objection/appeal to the Committee Chair in principle within 30 days of receiving the determination notice under Art. 11(11) (Art. 12(1)). These clocks apply exclusively to scientific research misconduct proceedings and do not govern undergraduate or generic coursework discipline.
Ai Tool Treatment · Records involved: 15 (13 corrected / adjusted · 2 added)
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textCisco AI アシスタント is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
New textCisco AI アシスタント is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Site correction
Site conclusion text changes
−Old textGemini is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
+New textGoogle Gemini is provided to all members of The University of Tokyo with ECCS Cloud Email accounts under institutional data protection; coursework use is governed by instructor assignment settings on UTOL.
Site correction
Site conclusion text changes
−Old textMicrosoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
+New textHistorical March2024 interim service notice (not a current comprehensive service inventory): Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is provided to all members of The University of Tokyo with UTokyo Accounts with commercial data protection; coursework use is governed by instructor assignment settings on UTOL.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textCopilot in Teams is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
New textCopilot in Teams is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textSlack AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
New textSlack AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textSlido AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
New textSlido AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textWebex AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
New textWebex AI is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Site correction
Site conclusion text changes
−Old textZoom AI Companion is listed for The University of Tokyo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
+New textZoom AI Companion is provided to eligible members of The University of Tokyo under institutional Zoom licenses; institutional access does not grant assessment permission.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUniversity of Tokyo will not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools like ChatGPT in education; instead, it actively explores their potential while continuing dialogue on practical knowledge and long-term impact.
New textUniversity of Tokyo will not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools like ChatGPT in education; instead, it actively explores their potential while continuing dialogue on practical knowledge and long-term impact.
Site correction
Site conclusion text changes
−Old textUTokyo does not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools; it actively explores their potential in education and research while providing practical usage guidance.
+New textHistorical March2024 interim service notice (not a current comprehensive service inventory): UTokyo does not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools; it actively explores their potential in education and research while providing practical usage guidance.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo does not enforce a blanket prohibition on generative AI tools; it actively explores their potential and provides practical guidance.
New textUTokyo does not enforce a blanket prohibition on generative AI tools; it actively explores their potential and provides practical guidance.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUniversity of Tokyo will not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools like ChatGPT in educational settings, per official policy signed by the Executive Vice President.
New textUniversity of Tokyo will not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools like ChatGPT in educational settings, per official policy signed by the Executive Vice President.
Site correction
Site conclusion text changes
−Old textUTokyo provides Gemini and Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat as university-wide contracted AI chat services; there is no university-wide ChatGPT contract.
+New textThe captured utelecon catalogue names Gemini and Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat as the two main university-contracted chat AI services. This listing does not establish that no other institutional contract exists.
Record addition
Added
+Effective February 24, 2026, Gemini generative AI features are integrated into Google Docs, Google Slides, and Google Forms for U-Tokyo users assigned Google Workspace for Education Plus licenses; tool presence does not authorize coursework drafting unless permitted by the instructor.
Record addition
Added
+Zoom AI Companion features (meeting summaries, in-meeting queries, smart recording highlights) are provided under U-Tokyo's campus-wide Zoom license, with meeting hosts controlling activation; institutional access does not grant coursework or exam permission.
Procurement · Records involved: 2 (2 corrected / adjusted)
Site correction
Site conclusion text changes
−Old textUTokyo centers its university-wide generative AI service on Microsoft Copilot, leveraging existing Microsoft contracts for low operational and cost burden.
+New textHistorical March2024 interim service notice (not a current comprehensive service inventory): UTokyo centers its university-wide generative AI service on Microsoft Copilot, leveraging existing Microsoft contracts for low operational and cost burden.
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo provides AI features embedded in multiple platforms (Zoom AI Companion, Slack AI, Cisco AI Assistant, Slido AI, Copilot in Teams) through university-wide contracts.
New textUTokyo provides AI features embedded in multiple platforms (Zoom AI Companion, Slack AI, Cisco AI Assistant, Slido AI, Copilot in Teams) through university-wide contracts.
Source Status · Records involved: 1 (1 corrected / adjusted)
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo's utelecon portal maintains a Policies and Guidelines index page linking to BYOD policy, generative AI information, and AI tools notifications.
New textUTokyo's utelecon portal maintains a Policies and Guidelines index page linking to BYOD policy, generative AI information, and AI tools notifications.
Other records · Records involved: 1 (1 corrected / adjusted)
Site correction
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Old textUTokyo warns that using AI-generated results as-is may entail future legal risks related to copyright and design rights.
New textUTokyo warns that using AI-generated results as-is may entail future legal risks related to copyright and design rights.
Official sources · Source check
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.
Source check
Comparable old and new text is unavailable.