University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK)

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Claims3Sources1
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+6-0
11 # Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: IITK's 2025-26 academic guide says using AI tools such as ChatGPT or Gemini to do assignments or write project reports is inappropriate.
3+Evidence (en, 7ea6b6b02034): using AI to do assignments or write project reports is inappropriate
4+teaching: IITK's 2025-26 academic guide frames student AI use around whether it helps the student learn better.
5+Evidence (en, 7ea6b6b02034): ask yourself a simple guiding question: "Will this help me learn better?"
6+academic_integrity: IITK's 2025-26 academic guide discusses writing down assignments from GPTs as a malpractice alongside plagiarism and copying.
7+Evidence (en, 7ea6b6b02034): Malpractices like plagiarism, copying or writing down assignments from GPTs

Claim changes

3 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

IITK's 2025-26 academic guide says using AI tools such as ChatGPT or Gemini to do assignments or write project reports is inappropriate.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

IITK's 2025-26 academic guide frames student AI use around whether it helps the student learn better.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

IITK's 2025-26 academic guide discusses writing down assignments from GPTs as a malpractice alongside plagiarism and copying.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

1 source attribution