Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Kanpur, India
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK)
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) is listed as QS 2026 rank 222. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 1 official source attribution. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) is listed as QS 2026 rank 222. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) has 3 source-backed AI policy claim records from 1 official source attribution. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 15, 2026 and last changed on May 15, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/indian-institute-of-technology-kanpur.json. The entity-level confidence is 88%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT, Gemini.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Teaching guidance
Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK) has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
IITK's 2025-26 academic guide says using AI tools such as ChatGPT or Gemini to do assignments or write project reports is inappropriate.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: guide_says_ai_for_assignments_or_project_reports_inappropriate
Original evidence
Evidence 1using AI to do assignments or write project reports is inappropriate
Teaching
IITK's 2025-26 academic guide frames student AI use around whether it helps the student learn better.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: guide_frames_ai_use_by_learning_benefit
Original evidence
Evidence 1ask yourself a simple guiding question: "Will this help me learn better?"
Academic Integrity
IITK's 2025-26 academic guide discusses writing down assignments from GPTs as a malpractice alongside plagiarism and copying.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: guide_discusses_gpt_written_assignments_as_malpractice_context
Original evidence
Evidence 1Malpractices like plagiarism, copying or writing down assignments from GPTs
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
1 source attribution
Your IITK Academic Compass 2025-26
iitk.ac.in
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.