public-release-20260715-005
与 public-release-20260714-002 相比。
大学 of Zurich public-release-20260715-005 差异
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
变更日志
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
University of Zurich currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年7月19日. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 2 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 University of Zurich。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
1 公开发布差异
与 public-release-20260714-002 相比。
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
9 声明 条记录
Copilot Chat (Basic) is listed for University of Zurich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
Microsoft 365 Copilot (Premium) is listed for University of Zurich in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
The University of Zurich has seven guiding principles on the use of artificial intelligence in research and teaching, adopted by the Extended Executive Board on 26 September 2023 and later expanded and supplemented.
UZH guiding principles say members are transparent about AI-tool use, users bear sole responsibility for AI-assisted content and products, and AI tools must be used in accordance with statutory provisions including data protection and copyright law.
UZH guiding principles say faculties should ensure equal opportunities and fair assessment conditions whether AI tools are permitted or prohibited, and that UZH will uphold academic integrity and penalize violations of its disciplinary or integrity rules.
UZH recommendations say faculties and study program directors are responsible for specific generative-AI guidelines and should ensure students know whether and how generative AI may be used in assessments.
UZH recommendations say a declaration of authenticity can address generative-AI tools, that the person completing it should confirm only permitted aids or tools were used, and that any generative-AI use must always be indicated.
For the University of Zurich Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, teaching staff determine for each module the extent to which AI is permitted for assessments; use of tools or generative AI without explicit consent and disclosure is punished as academic misconduct.
UZH.ai presents a current collection of central and faculty-specific AI guidelines and says UZH is working on a unified university-wide AI policy.
5 source attributions
official_policy_page Tracker checked at 2026年5月14日 04:22
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月14日 04:22
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月15日 23:37
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月14日 04:22
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月14日 04:22