Change log

University of Zurich

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Zurich currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

7 claim records

source_status

The University of Zurich has seven guiding principles on the use of artificial intelligence in research and teaching, adopted by the Extended Executive Board on 26 September 2023 and later expanded and supplemented.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

UZH guiding principles say members are transparent about AI-tool use, users bear sole responsibility for AI-assisted content and products, and AI tools must be used in accordance with statutory provisions including data protection and copyright law.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

UZH guiding principles say faculties should ensure equal opportunities and fair assessment conditions whether AI tools are permitted or prohibited, and that UZH will uphold academic integrity and penalize violations of its disciplinary or integrity rules.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

UZH recommendations say faculties and study program directors are responsible for specific generative-AI guidelines and should ensure students know whether and how generative AI may be used in assessments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

UZH recommendations say a declaration of authenticity can address generative-AI tools, that the person completing it should confirm only permitted aids or tools were used, and that any generative-AI use must always be indicated.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

For the University of Zurich Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, teaching staff determine for each module the extent to which AI is permitted for assessments; use of tools or generative AI without explicit consent and disclosure is punished as academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

source_status

UZH.ai presents a current collection of central and faculty-specific AI guidelines and says UZH is working on a unified university-wide AI policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions

University of Zurich AI Policy Tracker Release Diff | University AI Policy Tracker