Change log

University of Wollongong

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Wollongong currently has 11 source-backed claim records and 7 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 23, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 2 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted2Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

University of Wollongong release diff

Comparing public-release-20260526-001 to public-release-20260526-003.

+6-0
11 # University of Wollongong AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: University of Wollongong tells students to use UOW-approved tools such as Microsoft Copilot with enterprise data protection.
5+Evidence (en, 22d28a0abcb1): Use UOW-approved tools such as Microsoft Copilot that is secured by enterprise data protection.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+privacy: University of Wollongong warns that uploading personal, sensitive, or confidential information to generative AI may compromise privacy.
10+Evidence (en, 22d28a0abcb1): Uploading personal, sensitive or confidential information may cause unintended or harmful outcomes.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z

Claim changes

11 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

University of Wollongong tells students to use UOW-approved tools such as Microsoft Copilot with enterprise data protection.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Wollongong tells students to acknowledge generative AI use where appropriate.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

University of Wollongong warns that uploading personal, sensitive, or confidential information to generative AI may compromise privacy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

other

University of Wollongong says students must verify generative AI outputs against reliable sources.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

UOW's Subject Delivery Policy requires assessment information in each Subject Outline to include a statement indicating whether and how generative artificial intelligence tools can be used in the subject, including for each assessment task.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

privacy

UOW's Assessment and Feedback Policy says staff are not permitted to upload student work to third-party tools, including GenAI or misconduct detection software, in the context of privacy and data policies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

academic_integrity

UOW's Academic Integrity Policy lists misuse of generative artificial intelligence technology as academic misconduct when work is generated by an unauthorised AI tool without subject coordinator permission, or when permitted AI-generated work lacks appropriate acknowledgement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

academic_integrity

UOW states that misusing GenAI in assessments includes use where it is prohibited or beyond assessment instructions, and that misuse constitutes academic misconduct under University policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

ai_tool_treatment

UOW tells students to check the Subject Outline or subject Moodle site before using GenAI in an assessment task, because those sources specify the permitted extent of GenAI use and acknowledgement instructions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

privacy

UOW's student guidance recommends Microsoft Copilot when students use GenAI and says Copilot's Enterprise Data Protection means prompts and responses are encrypted and not retained by Microsoft to train its products.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

teaching

UOW's Learning and Teaching Hub FAQ encourages academics to discuss AI technologies with students and allow appropriate use in assessments, while noting that implementation varies by discipline, assessment type, and other factors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

Source snapshots

7 source attributions

Frequently Asked Questions: Artificial Intelligence in Education (UOW) - L&T Hub

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 5:01 AM

Snapshot hash
ba637ee3adc948b5f094a8028f3364025432c50f2e47f4b6488d75538dbf217a