Policy presence
University of Wollongong has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Wollongong, Australia
University of Wollongong has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
University of Wollongong has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
University of Wollongong has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Wollongong has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Wollongong has 4 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Wollongong has 4 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Wollongong has 3 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Wollongong has 5 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Wollongong has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
University of Wollongong has 2 source-backed public claims for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
11 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
Normalized value: subject_outline_must_include_genai_use_statement
Original evidence
Evidence 1A statement that indicates whether and how generative artificial intelligence tools can be used in the subject, including in relation to each assessment task.
Privacy
Normalized value: staff_no_upload_student_work_to_third_party_genai
Original evidence
Evidence 1It is important that such processes and technologies are institutionally supported and ethical in accord with associated privacy and data policies (e.g. staff are not permitted to upload student work to third party tools, including generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) or misconduct detection software).
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: academic_integrity_policy_genai_misuse_definition
Original evidence
Evidence 1Misuse of Generative Artificial Intelligence Technology Using work (e.g. assignment, essay, exam paper, research paper, creative project, data) generated by an unauthorised artificial intelligence (AI) tool in an assessment without permission from the subject coordinator; Using work generated by an artificial intelligence (AI) tool in an assessment where this is permitted, but without appropriate acknowledgement.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: misuse_constitutes_academic_misconduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1Misuse of gen AI in assessments includes using gen AI where it is prohibited or using it beyond the scope set out in the assessment instructions. Misuse of gen AI in assessments constitutes academic misconduct (as specified by University Policy).
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: subject_specific_permission_and_acknowledgement
Original evidence
Evidence 1Before using gen AI for an assessment task, make sure you check your Subject Outline and/or subject Moodle site to see to what extent gen AI may be used and associated instructions regarding acknowledgement.
Privacy
Normalized value: copilot_recommended_enterprise_data_protection
Original evidence
Evidence 1UOW recommends Copilot due to its Enterprise Data Protection policy, which means that your prompts and responses are encrypted and not retained by Microsoft to train its products.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: University of Wollongong tells students to use UOW-approved tools such as Microsoft Copilot with enterprise data protection.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Use UOW-approved tools such as Microsoft Copilot that is secured by enterprise data protection.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: University of Wollongong tells students to acknowledge generative AI use where appropriate.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Ensure that you acknowledge the use of gen AI, as appropriate for the context.
Privacy
Normalized value: University of Wollongong warns that uploading personal, sensitive, or confidential information to generative AI may compromise privacy.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Uploading personal, sensitive or confidential information may cause unintended or harmful outcomes.
Other
Normalized value: University of Wollongong says students must verify generative AI outputs against reliable sources.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Fact verification against reliable sources is essential as gen AI outputs can be inaccurate, fabricated or biased.
Teaching
Normalized value: educator_guidance_discuss_and_allow_appropriate_ai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Therefore, academics are encouraged to discuss the use of these technologies with their students and allow their appropriate use in assessments. How this can be done will vary depending on several factors (such as the discipline, the assessment type, etc.).
0 machine or needs-review claim
7 source attribution
policies.uow.edu.au
policies.uow.edu.au
ltc.uow.edu.au
uow.edu.au
uow.edu.au
policies.uow.edu.au
uow.edu.au