Wollongong, Australia

University of Wollongong

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

12 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Wollongong in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"UOW provides its approved Microsoft Copilot service to students through UOW accounts with enterprise data protection.","howToObtain":"Access Microsoft Copilot through a UOW account.","costToUser":"No cost through the UOW account.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Original evidence

Evidence 1
As a UOW student, you have access to Microsoft Copilot, which is supported by enterprise data protection and available at no cost through your UOW account. Make sure you use UOW-approved tools such as Microsoft Copilot.

Localized display only

As a UOW student, you have access to Microsoft Copilot, which is supported by enterprise data protection and available at no cost through your UOW account. Make sure you use UOW-approved tools such as Microsoft Copilot.

Teaching

UOW's Subject Delivery Policy requires assessment information in each Subject Outline to include a statement indicating whether and how generative artificial intelligence tools can be used in the subject, including for each assessment task.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: subject_outline_must_include_genai_use_statement

Original evidence

Evidence 1
A statement that indicates whether and how generative artificial intelligence tools can be used in the subject, including in relation to each assessment task.

Privacy

UOW's Assessment and Feedback Policy says staff are not permitted to upload student work to third-party tools, including GenAI or misconduct detection software, in the context of privacy and data policies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: staff_no_upload_student_work_to_third_party_genai

Original evidence

Evidence 1
It is important that such processes and technologies are institutionally supported and ethical in accord with associated privacy and data policies (e.g. staff are not permitted to upload student work to third party tools, including generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) or misconduct detection software).

Academic Integrity

UOW's Academic Integrity Policy lists misuse of generative artificial intelligence technology as academic misconduct when work is generated by an unauthorised AI tool without subject coordinator permission, or when permitted AI-generated work lacks appropriate acknowledgement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%

Normalized value: academic_integrity_policy_genai_misuse_definition

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Misuse of Generative Artificial Intelligence Technology Using work (e.g. assignment, essay, exam paper, research paper, creative project, data) generated by an unauthorised artificial intelligence (AI) tool in an assessment without permission from the subject coordinator; Using work generated by an artificial intelligence (AI) tool in an assessment where this is permitted, but without appropriate acknowledgement.

Academic Integrity

UOW states that misusing GenAI in assessments includes use where it is prohibited or beyond assessment instructions, and that misuse constitutes academic misconduct under University policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: misuse_constitutes_academic_misconduct

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Misuse of gen AI in assessments includes using gen AI where it is prohibited or using it beyond the scope set out in the assessment instructions. Misuse of gen AI in assessments constitutes academic misconduct (as specified by University Policy).

Ai Tool Treatment

UOW tells students to check the Subject Outline or subject Moodle site before using GenAI in an assessment task, because those sources specify the permitted extent of GenAI use and acknowledgement instructions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: subject_specific_permission_and_acknowledgement

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Before using gen AI for an assessment task, make sure you check your Subject Outline and/or subject Moodle site to see to what extent gen AI may be used and associated instructions regarding acknowledgement.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Wollongong tells students to use UOW-approved tools such as Microsoft Copilot with enterprise data protection.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: University of Wollongong tells students to use UOW-approved tools such as Microsoft Copilot with enterprise data protection.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Use UOW-approved tools such as Microsoft Copilot that is secured by enterprise data protection.

Academic Integrity

University of Wollongong tells students to acknowledge generative AI use where appropriate.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: University of Wollongong tells students to acknowledge generative AI use where appropriate.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Ensure that you acknowledge the use of gen AI, as appropriate for the context.

Privacy

University of Wollongong warns that uploading personal, sensitive, or confidential information to generative AI may compromise privacy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: University of Wollongong warns that uploading personal, sensitive, or confidential information to generative AI may compromise privacy.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Uploading personal, sensitive or confidential information may cause unintended or harmful outcomes.

Other

University of Wollongong says students must verify generative AI outputs against reliable sources.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: University of Wollongong says students must verify generative AI outputs against reliable sources.

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Fact verification against reliable sources is essential as gen AI outputs can be inaccurate, fabricated or biased.

Teaching

UOW's Learning and Teaching Hub FAQ encourages academics to discuss AI technologies with students and allow appropriate use in assessments, while noting that implementation varies by discipline, assessment type, and other factors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: educator_guidance_discuss_and_allow_appropriate_ai_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Therefore, academics are encouraged to discuss the use of these technologies with their students and allow their appropriate use in assessments. How this can be done will vary depending on several factors (such as the discipline, the assessment type, etc.).

Source record

Official sources

8 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Wollongong AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-wollongong

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log