University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

University of Wollongong

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Claims7Sources6
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Wollongong currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

University of Wollongong current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+14-0
11 # University of Wollongong AI policy record
2+teaching: UOW's Subject Delivery Policy requires assessment information in each Subject Outline to include a statement indicating whether and how generative artificial intelligence tools can be used in the subject, including for each assessment task.
3+Evidence (en-AU, d239af1be393): A statement that indicates whether and how generative artificial intelligence tools can be used in the subject, including in relation to each assessment task.
4+privacy: UOW's Assessment and Feedback Policy says staff are not permitted to upload student work to third-party tools, including GenAI or misconduct detection software, in the context of privacy and data policies.
5+Evidence (en-AU, 5554ddf30cd4): It is important that such processes and technologies are institutionally supported and ethical in accord with associated privacy and data policies (e.g. staff are not permitted to upload student work to third party tools, including generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) or misconduct detection software).
6+academic_integrity: UOW's Academic Integrity Policy lists misuse of generative artificial intelligence technology as academic misconduct when work is generated by an unauthorised AI tool without subject coordinator permission, or when permitted AI-generated work lacks appropriate acknowledgement.
7+Evidence (en-AU, 6f1c14215147): Misuse of Generative Artificial Intelligence Technology Using work (e.g. assignment, essay, exam paper, research paper, creative project, data) generated by an unauthorised artificial intelligence (AI) tool in an assessment without permission from the subject coordinator; Using work generated by an artificial intelligence (AI) tool in an assessment where this is permitted, but without appropriate acknowledgement.
8+academic_integrity: UOW states that misusing GenAI in assessments includes use where it is prohibited or beyond assessment instructions, and that misuse constitutes academic misconduct under University policy.
9+Evidence (en-AU, db6aa316741f): Misuse of gen AI in assessments includes using gen AI where it is prohibited or using it beyond the scope set out in the assessment instructions. Misuse of gen AI in assessments constitutes academic misconduct (as specified by University Policy).
10+ai_tool_treatment: UOW tells students to check the Subject Outline or subject Moodle site before using GenAI in an assessment task, because those sources specify the permitted extent of GenAI use and acknowledgement instructions.
11+Evidence (en-AU, db6aa316741f): Before using gen AI for an assessment task, make sure you check your Subject Outline and/or subject Moodle site to see to what extent gen AI may be used and associated instructions regarding acknowledgement.
12+privacy: UOW's student guidance recommends Microsoft Copilot when students use GenAI and says Copilot's Enterprise Data Protection means prompts and responses are encrypted and not retained by Microsoft to train its products.
13+Evidence (en-AU, 5d651f08ab22): UOW recommends Copilot due to its Enterprise Data Protection policy, which means that your prompts and responses are encrypted and not retained by Microsoft to train its products.
14+teaching: UOW's Learning and Teaching Hub FAQ encourages academics to discuss AI technologies with students and allow appropriate use in assessments, while noting that implementation varies by discipline, assessment type, and other factors.
15+Evidence (en-AU, ba637ee3adc9): Therefore, academics are encouraged to discuss the use of these technologies with their students and allow their appropriate use in assessments. How this can be done will vary depending on several factors (such as the discipline, the assessment type, etc.).

Claim changes

7 claim records

teaching

UOW's Subject Delivery Policy requires assessment information in each Subject Outline to include a statement indicating whether and how generative artificial intelligence tools can be used in the subject, including for each assessment task.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

privacy

UOW's Assessment and Feedback Policy says staff are not permitted to upload student work to third-party tools, including GenAI or misconduct detection software, in the context of privacy and data policies.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

academic_integrity

UOW's Academic Integrity Policy lists misuse of generative artificial intelligence technology as academic misconduct when work is generated by an unauthorised AI tool without subject coordinator permission, or when permitted AI-generated work lacks appropriate acknowledgement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

academic_integrity

UOW states that misusing GenAI in assessments includes use where it is prohibited or beyond assessment instructions, and that misuse constitutes academic misconduct under University policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

ai_tool_treatment

UOW tells students to check the Subject Outline or subject Moodle site before using GenAI in an assessment task, because those sources specify the permitted extent of GenAI use and acknowledgement instructions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

privacy

UOW's student guidance recommends Microsoft Copilot when students use GenAI and says Copilot's Enterprise Data Protection means prompts and responses are encrypted and not retained by Microsoft to train its products.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

teaching

UOW's Learning and Teaching Hub FAQ encourages academics to discuss AI technologies with students and allow appropriate use in assessments, while noting that implementation varies by discipline, assessment type, and other factors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen-AU

Source snapshots

6 source attributions

Frequently Asked Questions: Artificial Intelligence in Education (UOW) - L&T Hub

official_guidance checked May 15, 2026

Snapshot hash
ba637ee3adc948b5f094a8028f3364025432c50f2e47f4b6488d75538dbf217a