变更日志

Universitas Brawijaya

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Universitas Brawijaya currently has 3 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月18日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Universitas Brawijaya。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Universitas Brawijaya combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+6-0
11 # Universitas Brawijaya AI policy record
2+research: The UB-hosted JITeCS GenAI policy says reviewers must not use generative AI tools for any part of the peer-review process and must not share manuscripts with AI systems.
3+Evidence (en, cd7a4ab4cab6): Reviewers must not use Generative AI tools for any part of the peer-review process ... Reviewers may not upload, quote, or share manuscripts with any AI system or external entity.
4+research: The UB-hosted JITeCS GenAI policy permits authors to use generative AI for language and writing assistance with author oversight, while requiring disclosure of GenAI use in the manuscript.
5+Evidence (en, cd7a4ab4cab6): Authors are allowed to use GenAI for the following purposes: Language and Writing Assistance ... Drafting or refining sections of text with author oversight. All GenAI usage must be disclosed in the manuscript.
6+teaching: A UB Library article recommends clear institutional AI-use policies, including limits for AI tools in assignments and exams, guidance for assessing originality, and sanctions for academic-ethics violations involving AI.
7+Evidence (id, 79092d82eb41): Setiap institusi pendidikan perlu mengembangkan kebijakan eksplisit mengenai penggunaan AI. Ini mencakup: Batas penggunaan alat AI dalam tugas dan ujian; Panduan untuk dosen dalam menilai keaslian karya; Sanksi terhadap pelanggaran etika akademik yang melibatkan AI.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

3 声明 条记录

research

The UB-hosted JITeCS GenAI policy says reviewers must not use generative AI tools for any part of the peer-review process and must not share manuscripts with AI systems.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%证据1语言en

research

The UB-hosted JITeCS GenAI policy permits authors to use generative AI for language and writing assistance with author oversight, while requiring disclosure of GenAI use in the manuscript.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言en

teaching

A UB Library article recommends clear institutional AI-use policies, including limits for AI tools in assignments and exams, guidance for assessing originality, and sanctions for academic-ethics violations involving AI.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度82%证据1语言id

源快照

2 source attributions

GenAI Policy | Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science

official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月18日 04:53

快照哈希值
cd7a4ab4cab667f99b8ded36b9d43f7917bb5f75fbd3c42571c1b6d81533b588