University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

变更日志

The University of Warwick

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

审核: 智能体已审核最后检查时间2026年5月12日最后更改时间2026年5月12日声明10来源5版本记录0
大学页面公开 JSON月度报告大学索引

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

The University of Warwick currently has 10 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月12日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 The University of Warwick。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

The University of Warwick combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+20-0
11 # The University of Warwick AI policy record
2+procurement: Warwick's AI Information Compliance Policy says all new uses of AI tools, products, or services must go through appropriate procurement processes, regardless of cost.
3+Evidence (en, b3469285b32f): Regardless of costs, all new uses of AI tools and services/products or services, must go through appropriate procurement processes.
4+academic_integrity: Warwick's student-facing guidance says students are required to state whether AI was used in the submission process and explain why, where, and how it was used.
5+Evidence (en, f80891d64ee9): You will be required to state if any AI has been used as part of the submission procedure. If you use an AI, you must set out why, where and how you have done so.
6+security_review: Warwick's AI Information Compliance Policy covers everyone with a contractual or implied relationship with the University and all information processed by the University.
7+Evidence (en, b3469285b32f): The policy covers everyone who has a contractual (formal or informal/implied) relationship with the University, including employees, students, visiting academics, and consultants. The policy covers all information processed by the University, regardless of ownership or format.
8+privacy: Warwick's AI Information Compliance Policy says certain data, including personal or confidential material, University intellectual property, and some copyrighted or third-party data, must not be put into AI software without prior approval.
9+Evidence (en, b3469285b32f): Certain types of data must never be put into any AI software, without prior approval from IDG or the Research Ethics Committee. These include: Passwords and usernames. Personally identifiable information (PII) or other sensitive or confidential material. Any data related to University Intellectual Property.
10+academic_integrity: Warwick's student-facing guidance says students may use AI only within requirements set out in assessment briefs and course handbooks, which may restrict or prohibit AI use.
11+Evidence (en, f80891d64ee9): The general position is that you can use Artificial Intelligence (AI) but must follow any requirements set out in assessments and course handbooks. Those requirements may restrict or prohibit the use of AI.
12+research: Warwick's AI in research guidance says its principles apply to all researchers and researchers must consider AI-related research risks including integrity, information security, and accountability risks.
13+Evidence (en, 1a449b904c0f): The principles set out in this guidance apply to all researchers as previously defined. Researchers must consider all risks that may be relevant to their research that arise from AI.
14+privacy: Warwick's student-facing guidance tells students not to enter personal or confidential data into AI tools unless they understand what will happen to the data, and recommends Copilot chat with a Warwick account for that kind of data.
15+Evidence (en, f80891d64ee9): Do not input any personal or confidential data into any AI tools, unless you fully understand what will happen to that data. The university recommends using Co-Pilot chat for this kind of data - when logged in with your Warwick account.
16+research: Warwick's AI in research guidance says researchers are responsible for misconduct-type practices involving AI, including improper handling of information or use of another person's ideas, even if such practices occur inadvertently through an AI tool.
17+Evidence (en, 1a449b904c0f): Misconduct in research includes: the fabrication or falsification of research data; improper handling of information on individuals collected during research; or the use of another person's ideas, work or research data without appropriate acknowledgement. Researchers are responsible for any such practices, even if they occur inadvertently through the use of an AI tool.
18+teaching: Warwick's assessment-design guidance says generative AI use in student submissions needs thoughtful support so responsible use and clear demonstration of human achievement are maintained.
19+Evidence (en, c8778870c27e): use of generative AI technologies to produce text and other media as part of student submissions ... needs to be thoughtfully supported to ensure responsible use and clear demonstration of human achievements.
20+ai_tool_treatment: Warwick's responsible-use guidance frames responsible AI use as honest, ethical, transparent, human-accountable, safe, secure, and attentive to bias, fairness, inclusivity, and accessibility.
21+Evidence (en, 4356f58aa141): Responsible use includes ... using AI with honesty, in ethical and defensible ways, with human responsibility taken for the outcomes; being transparent about AI use; making concerted efforts to maximise safe and secure use; using AI in ways that mitigate bias and promote fairness, inclusivity and accessibility.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

10 声明 条记录

privacy

Warwick's AI Information Compliance Policy says certain data, including personal or confidential material, University intellectual property, and some copyrighted or third-party data, must not be put into AI software without prior approval.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%证据1语言en

procurement

Warwick's AI Information Compliance Policy says all new uses of AI tools, products, or services must go through appropriate procurement processes, regardless of cost.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%证据1语言en

security_review

Warwick's AI Information Compliance Policy covers everyone with a contractual or implied relationship with the University and all information processed by the University.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%证据1语言en

ai_tool_treatment

Warwick's responsible-use guidance frames responsible AI use as honest, ethical, transparent, human-accountable, safe, secure, and attentive to bias, fairness, inclusivity, and accessibility.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%证据1语言en

research

Warwick's AI in research guidance says researchers are responsible for misconduct-type practices involving AI, including improper handling of information or use of another person's ideas, even if such practices occur inadvertently through an AI tool.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据1语言en

research

Warwick's AI in research guidance says its principles apply to all researchers and researchers must consider AI-related research risks including integrity, information security, and accountability risks.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据1语言en

teaching

Warwick's assessment-design guidance says generative AI use in student submissions needs thoughtful support so responsible use and clear demonstration of human achievement are maintained.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%证据1语言en

privacy

Warwick's student-facing guidance tells students not to enter personal or confidential data into AI tools unless they understand what will happen to the data, and recommends Copilot chat with a Warwick account for that kind of data.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

Warwick's student-facing guidance says students are required to state whether AI was used in the submission process and explain why, where, and how it was used.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

Warwick's student-facing guidance says students may use AI only within requirements set out in assessment briefs and course handbooks, which may restrict or prohibit AI use.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据1语言en

源快照

5 source attributions