academic_integrity
The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide states that incorrect use of AI tools is considered academic misconduct and that suspected incorrect AI use for an assignment is handled under the SQU Academic Misconduct Policy.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Sultan Qaboos University currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
4 claim records
The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide states that incorrect use of AI tools is considered academic misconduct and that suspected incorrect AI use for an assignment is handled under the SQU Academic Misconduct Policy.
The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide tells students who intend to use generative AI in their work to discuss this with their teacher and cite the use of AI tools in the work.
Sultan Qaboos University's Centre for Preparatory Studies guidance says students may use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to enhance learning, but they remain expected to produce original work and should check with their teacher before using generative AI.
The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide tells students who use generative AI to carefully check its facts and claims and to read, understand, and critically evaluate AI-generated content before using it for ideas, information, structure, or language.
1 source attribution
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 1:05 PM