academic_integrity
The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide states that incorrect use of AI tools is considered academic misconduct and that suspected incorrect AI use for an assignment is handled under the SQU Academic Misconduct Policy.
变更日志
本站历史:0 次发布记录。
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
当前收录 4 条主张、1 个官方来源。
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Sultan Qaboos University。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
本站历史中暂无已记录的更新。
本站不提供法律或学术诚信建议;除链接指向大学官方页面的来源外,本站内容不代表大学官方声明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
仅展示已记录且 Claim ID 精确匹配的文字对照。
本站历史中暂无已记录的更新。
本站历史:0 次发布记录。
当前条款记录:4 条。
The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide states that incorrect use of AI tools is considered academic misconduct and that suspected incorrect AI use for an assignment is handled under the SQU Academic Misconduct Policy.
The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide tells students who intend to use generative AI in their work to discuss this with their teacher and cite the use of AI tools in the work.
Sultan Qaboos University's Centre for Preparatory Studies guidance says students may use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to enhance learning, but they remain expected to produce original work and should check with their teacher before using generative AI.
The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide tells students who use generative AI to carefully check its facts and claims and to read, understand, and critically evaluate AI-generated content before using it for ideas, information, structure, or language.
官方来源记录:1 条。
official_guidance 本站检查时间 2026年5月16日 13:05