public-release-20260719-011
与 public-release-20260718-009 相比。
Rutgers University–Newark public-release-20260719-011 差异
将 public-release-20260718-009 与 public-release-20260719-011 进行比较。
变更日志
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
Rutgers University–Newark currently has 14 source-backed claim records and 9 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年7月19日. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 5 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Rutgers University–Newark。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
将 public-release-20260718-009 与 public-release-20260719-011 进行比较。
1 公开发布差异
与 public-release-20260718-009 相比。
将 public-release-20260718-009 与 public-release-20260719-011 进行比较。
14 声明 条记录
NotebookLM is listed for Rutgers University–Newark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for Rutgers University–Newark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Microsoft Copilot is listed for Rutgers University–Newark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Google Gemini is listed for Rutgers University–Newark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
ChatGPT Edu is listed for Rutgers University–Newark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Rutgers Academic Integrity Policy 10.2.13 applies to all schools and academic units and says students must ensure submitted course, research, or other academic work is their own and created without impermissible technologies, materials, or collaborations.
Rutgers OIT guidance says only Rutgers-approved AI tools should be used at the university to protect university data and ensure appropriate use; Rutgers-approved versions include security and privacy safeguards and do not use Rutgers data to train underlying models.
Rutgers OIT guidance says AI use in academic settings typically varies by discipline, course, or instructor; students should not consider AI tools permissible for coursework unless instructors clearly state or communicate permission.
Rutgers OIT guidance says anyone considering purchase of an AI application for use at Rutgers must follow the same security processes and risk assessments as other software purchases, as well as Rutgers digital-accessibility standards.
Rutgers HRPP guidance says researchers using AI in human-subject research must clearly explain in consent forms how AI will be used, what data it will access, and associated risks and limitations.
Rutgers IT's central AI page lists Microsoft Copilot Chat, NotebookLM, and Google Gemini as centrally funded AI tools available to Rutgers students, faculty, and staff at no additional cost, while Microsoft 365 Copilot, ChatGPT Edu, and Google AI Pro are listed as subscription-required tools.
Rutgers OIT guidance says confidential information, protected health information, and other proprietary Rutgers information may not be appropriate for use in AI applications and systems, and directs users to Rutgers data-classification and IT policies.
Rutgers teaching guidance recommends clear and transparent course policies around generative AI, class discussion of those policies and rationales, and, when GenAI is permissible, student disclosure and reflection on use plus submission of prompts and outputs.
Rutgers teaching guidance says GenAI detectors should be treated with caution and cites research indicating they cannot currently be recommended for determining academic-integrity violations because of accuracy limits and false-accusation risk.
9 source attributions
official_policy_page Tracker checked at 2026年5月20日 01:15
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月20日 01:09
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月19日 12:30
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月19日 12:34
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月20日 01:08
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月20日 01:17
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月19日 12:33
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月20日 01:10
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月19日 12:32