University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

变更日志

Riga Technical University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

审核: 智能体已审核最后检查时间2026年5月20日最后更改时间2026年5月20日声明4来源3版本记录0
大学页面公开 JSON月度报告大学索引

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Riga Technical University currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月20日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Riga Technical University。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Riga Technical University combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+8-0
11 # Riga Technical University AI policy record
2+research: The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy requires transparent disclosure of AI-tool use in manuscript preparation, prohibits AI tools from generating scholarly content such as ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, and allows auxiliary technical uses such as editing, translation, corpus analysis, and visualization.
3+Evidence (en, cd2edb4d2797): The Journal "Scriptus Manet" mandates the transparent disclosure of any utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in manuscript preparation ... The utilization of AI tools for the generation of scholarly content, encompassing the development of ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, is prohibited.
4+academic_integrity: RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines allow artificial-intelligence-generated thesis content only in limited cases and state that use is not allowed for thesis goals, tasks, conclusions, or original solution content.
5+Evidence (en, 59eff26517db): Artificial intelligence tools can be used to generate content for the graduation thesis in case: a) it is not related to the skills and knowledge that the student is required to demonstrate ... c) it is authorized or supported by the study program ... The use of such tools is also not allowed for the formulation of the goal, tasks, and conclusions of the thesis.
6+research: The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy states that authors remain accountable for accuracy, originality, integrity, plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency regardless of AI usage.
7+Evidence (en, cd2edb4d2797): The author(s) are entirely accountable for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of all content within the submitted manuscript, including sections generated with the aid of AI tools. Authors remain ethically and legally accountable for issues such as plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency, regardless of AI usage.
8+academic_integrity: RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines give a reference-formatting category for generative artificial intelligence tools and say a screenshot of the artificial-intelligence tool response should be included in the thesis appendices.
9+Evidence (en, 59eff26517db): Correct referencing methods regarding the content generated by artificial intelligence tools are given in Appendix 7 of these guidelines. In the appendices to the graduation thesis, the student should include a screenshot of the response provided by the artificial intelligence tool.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

4 声明 条记录

research

The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy requires transparent disclosure of AI-tool use in manuscript preparation, prohibits AI tools from generating scholarly content such as ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, and allows auxiliary technical uses such as editing, translation, corpus analysis, and visualization.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度84%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines allow artificial-intelligence-generated thesis content only in limited cases and state that use is not allowed for thesis goals, tasks, conclusions, or original solution content.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度82%证据1语言en

research

The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy states that authors remain accountable for accuracy, originality, integrity, plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency regardless of AI usage.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度82%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

RTU FCSITE graduation-thesis guidelines give a reference-formatting category for generative artificial intelligence tools and say a screenshot of the artificial-intelligence tool response should be included in the thesis appendices.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度78%证据1语言en

源快照

3 source attributions