Change log

Queen's University at Kingston

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Queen's University at Kingston currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

7 claim records

privacy

Queen's guidance directs users working with internal or confidential data to use only Queen's-approved AI tools such as LibreChat and Microsoft Copilot with Queen's single sign-on.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

Queen's AI Applications page states that the university has conducted security and privacy assessments for generative AI software and uses those assessments to identify risks and inform use guidelines.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Queen's common course policies state that course outlines will include a statement indicating whether generative AI tools are permitted in a course and under what conditions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesen

other

Queen's describes responsible generative AI use through five guiding principles for students, staff, and faculty, including checks for whether a use is prohibited, permitted, encouraged, or required.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

Queen's CTL guidance says instructors should specify parameters for AI tool use in courses and advise on terms of use through a syllabus statement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

Queen's Library Generative AI guide says unauthorized use of generative AI tools is considered a departure from academic integrity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

Queen's Library Generative AI privacy guide warns users not to assume that data input into an AI tool is private and confidential.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

6 source attributions

AI Applications

official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 5:01 AM

Snapshot hash
a405e5fe4a01532e861f4bc430178ad7b0c06f48e8e452b69a0d33a2392a0621
Queen's University at Kingston AI Policy Tracker Release Diff | University AI Policy Tracker