privacy
Queen's guidance directs users working with internal or confidential data to use only Queen's-approved AI tools such as LibreChat and Microsoft Copilot with Queen's single sign-on.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Queen's University at Kingston
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Queen's University at Kingston currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Queen's University at Kingston. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Queen's University at Kingston combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+14-0
11 # Queen's University at Kingston AI policy record
2+privacy: Queen's guidance directs users working with internal or confidential data to use only Queen's-approved AI tools such as LibreChat and Microsoft Copilot with Queen's single sign-on.
3+Evidence (en, bea8795eac2b): If you are using internal or confidential data, use only Queen’s-approved AI tools like LibreChat and Microsoft Copilot with Queen’s single sign-on. If only general data is involved, external tools may be acceptable with caution.
4+security_review: Queen's AI Applications page states that the university has conducted security and privacy assessments for generative AI software and uses those assessments to identify risks and inform use guidelines.
5+Evidence (en, a405e5fe4a01): To ensure the safe and appropriate use of generative AI software, the university has conducted a series of security and privacy assessments through the Security Assessment Process (SAP). These evaluations help identify potential risks, protect user privacy and institutional data, and inform appropriate use guidelines.
6+teaching: Queen's common course policies state that course outlines will include a statement indicating whether generative AI tools are permitted in a course and under what conditions.
7+Evidence (en, 480444131c2f): Statement and Guidance for Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools Your course outline will include a statement indicating whether generative AI tools are permitted in your course and under what conditions. Review that statement carefully and speak with your instructor if you have questions.
8+other: Queen's describes responsible generative AI use through five guiding principles for students, staff, and faculty, including checks for whether a use is prohibited, permitted, encouraged, or required.
9+Evidence (en, bea8795eac2b): Queen’s promotes the responsible use of generative AI across our community and has defined five guiding principles to help students, staff, and faculty make informed, effective decisions about integrating it into their work. Each principle below includes quick self-assessment questions to help users judge whether a use is prohibited, permitted, encouraged, or required.
10+teaching: Queen's CTL guidance says instructors should specify parameters for AI tool use in courses and advise on terms of use through a syllabus statement.
11+Evidence (en, 72543ea6a608): Provide students guidance: Instructors should specify the parameters for AI tool use in their courses and advise on terms of use via a syllabus statement. Academic integrity: Unauthorized use of generative AI is considered a departure from academic integrity.
12+academic_integrity: Queen's Library Generative AI guide says unauthorized use of generative AI tools is considered a departure from academic integrity.
13+Evidence (en, 752c29838615): As of July 2024: There is no overall ban on the use of generative AI tools. Instructors should provide students with specific parameters for AI use in the course syllabus. Unauthorized use of generative AI tools is considered a "departure from academic integrity."
14+privacy: Queen's Library Generative AI privacy guide warns users not to assume that data input into an AI tool is private and confidential.
15+Evidence (en, 3aa978e6c425): Always read the terms of use or privacy statements of the AI tool you're using. Some AI tools will use your inputted data (and the associated output) to further train or audit their models. Do not assume that any data you input into an AI tool is private and confidential.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
7 claim records
security_review
Queen's AI Applications page states that the university has conducted security and privacy assessments for generative AI software and uses those assessments to identify risks and inform use guidelines.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Queen's common course policies state that course outlines will include a statement indicating whether generative AI tools are permitted in a course and under what conditions.
Review: Agent reviewed
other
Queen's describes responsible generative AI use through five guiding principles for students, staff, and faculty, including checks for whether a use is prohibited, permitted, encouraged, or required.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Queen's CTL guidance says instructors should specify parameters for AI tool use in courses and advise on terms of use through a syllabus statement.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
Queen's Library Generative AI guide says unauthorized use of generative AI tools is considered a departure from academic integrity.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
Queen's Library Generative AI privacy guide warns users not to assume that data input into an AI tool is private and confidential.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
6 source attributions
Academic Integrity - Generative AI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 5:01 AM
AI Applications
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 5:01 AM
Common Course Policies and Statements
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 5:02 AM
Guidelines for Your Course Outline
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 5:02 AM
Guiding principles for the responsible use of generative AI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 5:01 AM
Privacy - Generative AI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 15, 2026, 5:02 AM